On August
5, 2004, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (“MSRB”) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) proposed amendments
to Rule G-3, on professional qualifications, to remove the exemptions from the
Regulatory Element of the Continuing Education Program and require all
registered persons to participate in the Regulatory Element.[1] The effective date of the amendments is
dependent upon the effective date of similar proposed amendments filed by the
NASD[2]
because NASD administers the Regulatory Element computer-based education
program. NASD has stated that it will
announce the effective date of its proposed rule change in a Notice to Members
to be published no later than 60 days following Commission approval. NASD stated that the effective date will be
(1) not more than 30 days following publication of the Notice to Members
announcing Commission approval, (2) not more than 30 days following the
implementation of necessary changes to Web Central Registration Depository (Web
CRD), or (3) April 4, 2005, whichever date is the latest to occur. The effective date of the MSRB’s proposed amendments
will be the same as the effective date of the NASD’s proposed amendments.
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS
Rule G-3(h), on Continuing
Education (“CE”) requirements, specifies the CE requirements for registered
persons subsequent to their initial qualification and registration. The requirements consist of a Regulatory
Element and a Firm Element.[3] The Regulatory Element is a computer-based
education program administered by NASD to help ensure that registered persons
are kept up-to-date on regulatory, compliance, and sales practice matters in
the industry.[4] Unless exempt, each registered person is
required to complete the Regulatory Element initially within 120 days after the
person’s second registration anniversary date and, thereafter, within 120 days
after every third registration anniversary date.[5] There are three Regulatory Element programs:
the S201 Supervisor Program for registered principals and supervisors; the S106
Series 6 Program for Series 6 representatives; and the S101 General Program for
Series 7 and all other registrations.
Approximately 135,000 registered
persons currently are exempt from the Regulatory Element. These include registered persons who, when
the CE Program was adopted in 1995, had been registered for at least ten years
and who did not have a significant disciplinary action[6]
in their CRD record for the previous ten years (“grandfathered” persons). These also include those persons who had
“graduated” from the Regulatory Element by satisfying their tenth anniversary
requirement before July 1998, when Rule G-3(h) was amended and the graduation
provision eliminated, and who did not have a significant disciplinary action in
their CRD records for the previous ten years.[7]
At its December 2003 meeting, the Securities
Industry/Regulatory Council on Continuing Education (“Council”)[8]
discussed the current exemptions from the Regulatory Element and agreed
unanimously to recommend that the SROs repeal the exemptions and require all
registered persons to participate in the Regulatory Element. In reaching this conclusion, the Council was
of the view that there is great value in exposing all industry participants to
the benefits of the Regulatory Element, in part because of the significant
regulatory issues that have emerged over the past few years. The Regulatory Element programs include
teaching and training content that is continuously updated to address current
regulatory concerns as well as new products and trading strategies. Exempt persons currently do not have the
benefit of this material.
In addition, the Council will introduce a new content
module to the Regulatory Element programs that will specifically address ethics
and will require participants to recognize ethical issues in given
situations. Participants will be
required to make decisions in the context of, for example, peer pressure, the
temptation to rationalize, or a lack of clear-cut guidance from existing rules
or regulations. The Council strongly
believes that all registered persons, regardless of their years of experience
in the industry, should have the benefit of this training.
Consistent with the Council’s recommendation, the
amendments would eliminate the current Regulatory Element exemptions. The other SRO members of the Council also
support eliminating the exemptions and are pursuing amendments to their
respective rules.
Following the effective date of the amendments,
implementation will be based on the application of the existing requirements of
the Regulatory Element (Rule G-3(h)(i)(A)) to all registered persons. The way in which CRD applies these
requirements is as follows. CRD
establishes a “base date” for each registered person and calculates
anniversaries from that date. Usually,
the base date is the person’s initial securities registration. However, the base date may be revised to be
the effective date of a significant disciplinary action in accordance with Rule
G-3(h)(i)(C) or the date on which a formerly registered person re-qualifies for
association with an NASD member by qualification exam. Using the base date, CRD creates a Regulatory
Element requirement on the second anniversary of the base date and then every
three years thereafter. Beginning on or
after the effective date of the proposed rule change, registered persons
formerly exempt from the Regulatory Element requirement must satisfy such
requirement on the occurrence of a Regulatory Element base date anniversary (i.e.,
the second anniversary of the base date and every three years thereafter).[9]
NASD staff has reviewed a projection of how the
anniversaries of the formerly exempt registered persons will occur using the
base dates that CRD maintains for these persons. The projection shows that within three years from the proposed
rule’s effective date, all formerly exempt registered persons will have been
brought into the Regulatory Element program.
Furthermore, anniversaries will occur at a more-or-less steady rate so
that there would be no extraordinary stress placed upon the capacity of the
existing test/training facilities during the next three years or thereafter.
In addition, the proposed rule
amendment would replace references in Rule G-3(h)(i)(C) to “re-entry” into the
Regulatory Element with a requirement to “retake” the Regulatory Element to
clarify that the significant disciplinary action provisions apply to all registered
persons and not only to currently exempt persons.
August 5, 2004
TEXT OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS[10]
Rule G- 3. Classification of Principals and Representatives; Numerical
Requirements; Testing; Continuing Education Requirements
(a) – (g) No change.
(h) Continuing Education Requirements
This section (h) prescribes requirements regarding the
continuing education of certain registered persons subsequent to their initial
qualification and registration with a registered securities association
with respect to a person associated with a member of such association, or the
appropriate regulatory agency as defined in section 3(a)(34) of the Act with
respect to a person associated with any other broker, dealer or municipal
securities dealer (“the appropriate enforcement authority”). The requirements shall consist of a
Regulatory Element and a Firm Element as set forth below.
(i) Regulatory Element
(A)
Requirements—No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall permit any
registered person to continue to, and no registered person shall continue to,
perform duties as a registered person, unless such person has complied with the
requirements of section (i) hereof.
[(1)]
Each registered person shall complete the Regulatory Element [beginning
with] on the occurrence of their second registration anniversary
date and every three years thereafter or as otherwise prescribed by the
Board. On each occasion, the Regulatory
Element must be completed within 120 days after the person’s registration
anniversary date. A person’s initial
registration date, also known as the “base date,” shall establish the
cycle of anniversary dates for purposes of this section (i). The content of the Regulatory Element shall
be determined by the Board for each registration category of persons subject to
the rule.
[(2)
Persons who have been continuously registered for more than 10 years as of the
effective date of this section are exempt from the requirements of this rule
relative to participation in the Regulatory Element, provided such persons have
not been subject to any disciplinary action within the last 10 years as
enumerated in paragraphs (i)(C)(1)-(2) of this section. However, persons delegated supervisory
responsibility or authority pursuant to rule G-27 and registered in such
supervisory capacity are exempt from participation in the Regulatory Element
under this provision only if they have been continuously registered in a
supervisory capacity for more than ten years as of the effective date of this
rule and provided that such supervisory person has not been subject to any
disciplinary action under paragraphs (i)(C)(1)-(2) of this section.]
[(3) In
the event that a registered person who is exempt from participation in the
Regulatory Element subsequently becomes the subject of a disciplinary action as
enumerated in paragraphs (i)(C)(1)-(2), such person shall be required to
satisfy the requirements of the Regulatory Element as if the date the
disciplinary action becomes final is the person’s initial registration
anniversary date.]
(B) No change.
(C) [Re-entry into Program]
Disciplinary Actions—Unless otherwise determined by the appropriate
enforcement authority, a registered person will be required to [re-enter]
retake the Regulatory Element and satisfy all of its requirements in the
event such person:
(1) becomes
subject to any statutory disqualification as defined in Section 3(a)(39) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
(2) becomes
subject to suspension or to the imposition of a fine of $5,000 or more for
violation of any provision of any securities law or regulation, or any
agreement with or rule or standard of conduct of any securities governmental
agency, securities self-regulatory organization, the appropriate enforcement
authority or as imposed by any such regulatory or self-regulatory organization
in connection with a disciplinary proceeding; or
(3) is ordered as
a sanction in a disciplinary action to [re-enter] retake
the [continuing education program] Regulatory Element by
any securities governmental agency, the appropriate enforcement authority or
securities self-regulatory organization.
[Re-entry] The
retaking of the Regulatory Element shall commence with [initial] participation within 120 days of the registered person becoming subject to the
statutory disqualification, in the case of (1) above, or the completion of the
sanction or the disciplinary action becomes final, in the case of (2) or (3)
above. The date that the disciplinary
action becomes final will be deemed the person’s [initial registration
anniversary] new base date for purposes of this section (i).
(D) - (G) No
change.
(ii) No
change.
[1] File No. SR-MSRB-2004-04.
Comments on the proposed amendments should be submitted to the SEC and
should reference this file number.
[2] See SR-NASD-2004-098.
[3] The Firm Element of the CE Program applies to any person
registered with an MSRB registered firm who has direct contact with customers
in the conduct of the dealer’s municipal securities sales, trading and
investment banking activities and to the immediate supervisors of such persons
(collectively called “covered registered persons”). The requirement stipulates that each firm must maintain a
continuing and current education program for its covered registered persons to
enhance their securities knowledge, skill and professionalism. Each firm is required annually to conduct a
training needs analysis, develop a written training plan, and implement the
plan.
[4] Rule G-3(h)(i)(G) permits a dealer to deliver the
Regulatory Element to registered persons on firm premises (“In-Firm Delivery”)
as an option to having persons take the training at a designated center
provided that firms comply with specific requirements relating to supervision,
delivery site(s), technology, administration, and proctoring. In addition, Rule G-3(h)(i)(G)(5)(c)
requires that persons serving as proctors for the purposes of In-Firm Delivery
must be registered.
[5] This is the current Regulatory Element schedule, as
amended in 1998.
[6] For purposes of Rule G-3(h), a significant disciplinary action
generally means a statutory disqualification, a suspension or imposition of a
fine of $5,000 or more, or being subject to an order from a securities
regulator to re-enter the Regulatory Element.
See Rule G-3(h)(i)(C).
[7] When Rule G-3(h) was first adopted in 1995, the Regulatory
Element schedule required registered persons to satisfy the Regulatory Element
on the second, fifth and tenth anniversary of their initial securities
registration. After satisfying the
tenth anniversary requirement, a person was “graduated” from the Regulatory
Element. A graduated principal
re-entered the Regulatory Element if he or she incurred a significant
disciplinary action. A graduated person
who was not a principal re-entered if he or she acquired a principal registration
or incurred a significant disciplinary action.
[8] The Council consists of 20 individuals, six representing
self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”) (American Stock Exchange LLC, Chicago
Board Options Exchange, Inc., MSRB, NASD, New York Stock Exchange, Inc., and
Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.) and 14 representing the industry. The Council was organized in 1995 to
facilitate cooperative industry/regulatory coordination of the CE Program in
keeping with applicable industry regulations and changing industry needs. Its roles include recommending and helping
to develop specific content and questions for the Regulatory Element, defining
minimum core curricula for the Firm Element, developing and updating
information about the program for industry-wide dissemination, and maintaining
the program on a revenue-neutral basis while assuring adequate financial
reserves.
[9] Bank dealers do not have access to CRD. Each bank dealer must track the base date of
each of its employees and schedule appointments for those employees to complete
the Regulatory Element when required.
When developing its plan to bring formerly exempt registered persons
into the CRD system, NASD believed that the number of employees of non-NASD
member firms who would be affected would not impact the delivery plan
significantly.
[10] Underlining indicates new language; brackets indicate
deletions.