Interpretation
on General Advertising Disclosures, Blind Advertisements and Annual Reports
Relating to Municipal Fund Securities Under Rule G-21
June
5, 2007
Rule G-21, on advertising,
establishes specific requirements for advertisements by brokers, dealers and
municipal securities dealers (“dealers”) of municipal fund securities,
including but not limited to advertisements for 529 college savings plans (“529
plans”). This notice sets forth interpretive guidance under Rule G-21 with
respect to time-limited broadcast advertisements, blind advertisements, and
annual reports or other similar information required to be distributed under
state mandates.
General Disclosures in Time-Limited Broadcast
Advertisements
Rule G-21(e)(i)(A) requires certain
basic disclosures to be provided in product advertisements for municipal fund
securities. These disclosures are not legends requiring the inclusion of
specific language. Rather, these disclosure requirements may be complied with
if the substance of such information is effectively conveyed, regardless of the
specific language used in the advertisement. In general, the context in which
the information is provided is an important factor in determining whether the
information is effectively conveyed.
These
required disclosures may present challenges in the context of broadcast
advertisements, such as traditional television or radio commercials with
30-second run-times or public service announcements with shorter run-times. In
the context of time-limited broadcast advertisements, dealers should provide
such disclosures in a manner that appropriately balances the intended message
with the required disclosures. Given the unique nature of broadcast
advertisements, where the oral presentation of more information can often
result in a decreased likelihood that the central message of such information
will be understood and retained, somewhat abbreviated forms of the required
disclosures may be appropriate for such time-limited broadcast advertisements,
particularly if the disclosures are made with close attention paid to ensuring
that they are presented with equal prominence to the remainder of the message.
Thus, for example, in a time-limited
broadcast advertisement for a non-money market 529 plan, the following
language, spoken in a manner consistent with the remaining oral presentation of
information, generally would satisfy the disclosure requirements of Rule
G-21(e)(i)(A): “To learn about [529 plan name], its investment objectives,
risks and costs, read the official statement available from [source]. Check
with your home state to learn if it offers tax or other benefits for investing
in its own 529 plan.” Further, in a time-limited television advertisement, the
source for the official statement, together with a contact telephone number or
web address, generally could be displayed on screen while other portions of the
disclosures are spoken. This example is intended to be illustrative and is not
intended to be exclusive or to necessarily establish a baseline for disclosure.
Blind Advertisements
Under Rule G-21(e)(i)(B)(2), certain
product advertisements for municipal fund securities that promote an issuer and
its public purpose without promoting specific municipal fund securities or
identifying a dealer or its affiliates may omit the general disclosures
otherwise required under Rule G-21(e)(i)(A). Among other things, such a blind
advertisement may include contact information for the issuer or an agent of the
issuer to obtain an official statement or other information, provided that if
such issuer’s agent is a dealer or dealer affiliate, no orders may be accepted
through such source unless initiated by the customer. Although the contact
information may direct a potential customer to a dealer or its affiliate acting
as agent of the issuer, the face of the advertisement may not identify such
dealer or affiliate.
For example, a blind advertisement
may say “call 1-800-xxx-xxxx for more information” or “go to
www.[state-name]-529plan.com for more information” but may not say “call
[dealer name] at 1-800-xxx-xxxx for more information” or “go to
www.[dealer-name]-529plan.com for more information.” This provision does not
preclude the person who answers a phone inquiry, or the website to which the
URL links, from identifying the dealer or its affiliate, so long as such dealer
or affiliate is clearly disclosed to be acting on behalf of the issuer
identified in the advertisement.
If a potential customer initiates
an order through the source identified in the advertisement, a distinct barrier
between the providing of information and the seeking of orders must be
maintained to qualify as a blind advertisement. For example, solely for purposes
of Rule G-21(e)(i)(B)(2), a dealer may establish that the customer initiated
the order by requiring, in the case of a telephone inquiry, that the customer
be transferred from the initial dealer contact person to a different person
before the customer provides any information used in connection with an order
or, in the case of a web-based inquiry, that the customer navigate from the
initial webpage referred to in the advertisement to another page on the same or
different web site before entering any information used in connection with an
order.[1] Of course, the dealer must be mindful of its obligation
under Rule G-17, on fair practice, to provide to the customer, at or prior to
the time of trade, all material facts about the transaction known by the dealer
as well as material facts about the security that are reasonably accessible to
the market, regardless of whether the transaction was recommended or whether an
order may be characterized as unsolicited.[2] In addition, if the
transaction is recommended, the dealer must fulfill its obligations with
respect to suitability under Rule G-19, on suitability of recommendations and
transactions.[3]
Required Annual Reports
Excluded from Definition of Advertisement
In some cases, a dealer may be
required, by state law or the rules and regulations adopted by the state or an
instrumentality thereof governing a particular 529 plan or other municipal fund
security program, to prepare or distribute an annual financial report or other
similar information regarding such plan or program. So long as a dealer
provides any such required report or information with respect to a 529 plan or
other municipal fund securities program solely in the manner required by such
state law or rules and regulations, such report or information will not be
treated as an advertisement for purposes of Rule G-21.[4] However,
the dealer would remain subject to Rule G-17, which requires that the dealer
deal fairly with all persons, prohibits the dealer from engaging in any
deceptive, dishonest or unfair practice and requires the dealer to provide to
its customer, at or prior to the time of trade, all material facts about a
transaction known by the dealer or that are reasonably accessible to the
market. In addition, if such information is used in any manner beyond what is
narrowly required by such law, rules or regulation, such use of the information
would become subject to Rule G-21 as an advertisement.[5]
__________________
ENDNOTES
1 These
methods are not intended to be the exclusive means by which a dealer could
establish that the customer initiated the order.
2 See
Rule G-17 Interpretation – Interpretive Notice Regarding Rule G-17, on
Disclosure of Material Facts, March 20, 2002, reprinted in MSRB Rule
Book.
3 See
Rule G-17 Interpretation – Interpretation on Customer Protection Obligations
Relating to the Marketing of 529 College Savings Plans, August 7, 2006, reprinted
in MSRB Rule Book.
4 If
such information is distributed through the official statement, then it would
not be considered an advertisement by virtue of the exclusion of official
statements from the definition of “advertisement” in Rule G-21(a)(i).
5 This
guidance is consistent with similar guidance provided by NASD with respect to its
advertising rule, Rule 2210, as applied to certain performance information and
hypothetical illustrations required by state laws to be provided by dealers in
connection with retirement investments and variable annuity contracts. SeeSee letter dated November 29, 2004, to Therese Squillacote, Chief Compliance
Officer, ING Financial Advisers, LLC, from Philip A. Shaikun, Assistant General
Counsel, NASD; letter dated September 30, 2002, to Sally Krawczyk, Esq.,
Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan, LLP, from Mr. Shaikun; and letter dated
February 5, 1999, to W. Thomas Conner, Vice President, Regulatory Affairs,
National Association of Variable Annuities, from Robert J. Smith, Office of
General Counsel, NASD Regulation, Inc.
CROSS-REFERENCES
Rule G-19 Interpretation- Notice Concerning the Application of Suitability Requirements to Investment Seminars and Customer Inquiries Made in Response to a Dealer's Advertisement, May 7, 1985.
Rule G-30 Interpretation- Interpretive Notice on Commissions and Other Changes, Advertisements and Offical Statements Relating to Municipal Fund Securities, December 19, 2001.