File No. SR-MSRB-2004-02 (June 1, 2004); SEC Approval Order Release No.
34-50294 (August 31, 2004)
Proposed
RTRS Facility
The MSRB has coordinated its plans for
the RTRS facility with the new real-time comparison system for municipal and
corporate bonds (the “Real-Time Trade Matching” or “RTTM” system) now being
implemented by National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC).[1] The use of the NSCC
telecommunication facility as a data collection point or “Portal” for
transaction data and the use of a standard common format for trade reporting
and automated comparison through NSCC are intended to reduce dealer costs in
complying with the 15-minute transaction reporting requirement. Retail and
institutional customer transactions and IDRO reports also will be reported
through NSCC using the same record format as used for inter-dealer trades.[2] NSCC will not process customer
transactions in the comparison system, but will forward the data to the MSRB
and thus allow dealers to avoid setting up separate telecommunications links
and facilities specifically for trade reporting to the MSRB.[3] In this manner NSCC and MSRB have
attempted to provide a means for dealers to leverage their systems development
work to satisfy two goals at once – that of real-time transaction reporting and
real-time comparison of inter-dealer transactions. In this regard, the
development plans for both systems have been coordinated to provide the
greatest efficiencies possible for dealers.
Improved Functionality. The objective of
real-time transaction reporting is to make price and volume information
publicly available as soon as possible after trades are executed. Real-time
reporting will also bring improved functionality to dealers and enforcement
agencies, compared with the current batch-oriented reporting system. These
improvements include:
•
The ability to correct regulatory data, such as time of trade, on
inter-dealer trade reports;
•
The ability for a dealer to ensure the accuracy of regulatory
data even when that information is reported on its behalf by a clearing broker;
•
The capability for dealers to report their capacity as agent in
inter-dealer trades; and
•
Improvements in the “audit trail” of trade information.
Submission of Transaction
Reports by Intermediaries. As in the current transaction reporting system,
a dealer will be able to use an intermediary, i.e., its clearing broker
or service bureau, to submit transaction reports to RTRS. Also following
current policies, inter-dealer transaction reporting and comparison will be
accomplished using one transaction report. The MSRB expects those dealers that
are not self-clearing to submit inter-dealer trades through their clearing
broker as they do today. However, these dealers must ensure that the clearing
broker will be able to submit the trade report satisfying both comparison and
transaction reporting requirements within 15 minutes of the time of trade. Both
dealers in this case will have the responsibility to work together to ensure
that such trade submissions are timely and accurate. It will be possible for
the correspondent to submit customer trade reports directly to the MSRSB or for
the clearing broker to submit on the correspondent’s behalf.
Message-Based and Web-Based
Input Methods. Two format options will be available for submission
of data into RTRS: 1) message-based trade input, and 2) Web-based trade
input. In message-based trade input, each trade is submitted as a “message” in
a standardized format. A trade input message consists of a sequence of data
tags and data fields – for example, the tag “SETT” followed by a date field
indicates the settlement date of the trade. For real-time trade reporting and
comparison, the format standard is the ISO 15022 format established by the
International Organization for Standardization.[4]
Each message is sent as a separate unit between two computers. The fact
that a trade message is the basic telecommunications unit enables real-time
reporting, comparison and interactive feedback. Messages are well-suited to
automated high-volume operations and to “straight-through processing” methods.
In using the Web-based method, the dealer
manually accesses a Web site through an Internet browser to enter, correct or
view trade data. As described below, different Web sites are used depending
whether the data is entered for both comparison and regulatory reporting or
only for reporting purposes. The Web-based method requires no system
development work beyond setting up an Internet connection and obtaining the
appropriate user ID, password and security safeguards. However, Web input is
manual and it will not be possible to interface the Web-based method with the
dealer’s processing system. Therefore, exclusive use of the Web-based method
for submitting transactions generally will be appropriate only for relatively
low-volume submitters.
For high-volume submitters of transaction data,
such as large dealers, clearing brokers and service bureaus, the only efficient
and practical means for initial trade submission is likely to be
message-based. The extent of systems work necessary for interfacing with RTRS
(and with RTTM) in this case will be dependent in large part on whether the
submitter currently captures trade data in real time for processing.
Submitters that have prepared for real-time transaction reporting and
comparison by converting from overnight batch processing systems to ones with a
more real-time or straight-through processing approach should find the
necessary systems changes comparatively minor.
Dealers may use the message-based method, the
Web-based method, or both. Some high-volume dealers may submit the initial
trade report as a message, review their submission and the RTRS status
information on a Web site, and make corrections manually using Web-based trade
input. Instead of using the Web, dealers may also submit corrections in
message format. Alternatively, some low-volume dealers may use the message-based
system if messaging is made available to them by clearing brokers or service
bureaus.[5]
RTRS Portals. In the proposed amendment
to the G-14 RTRS Transaction Reporting Procedures, the MSRB has designated
three RTRS “Portals” for the receipt of municipal securities trade data. Each
Portal has a different policy governing the type of trade data it can accept.
Message-based trade input must go through the Message Portal, but Web-based
trade input may go through either the RTRS Web Portal or the RTTM Web Portal.
• The Message Portal is operated by NSCC and accepts any type of
municipal security trade submission or modification. All trade messages that
the dealer indicates should be forwarded to RTRS will be relayed to RTRS by
NSCC. In addition, messages that the dealer indicates should be processed by
the comparison system will be routed to RTTM.[6]
• The RTRS Web Portal is operated by the MSRB and accepts any
municipal security trade submission or modification except data that would
initially report or modify inter-dealer transaction data used in the comparison
process. (Comparison data instead must be entered into the comparison system
using a method authorized by NSCC such as the Message Portal or the RRM Web
Portal). The RTRS Web Portal may be used to report or correct (a) customer
trade data, (b) IDRO data, and (c) inter-dealer trade data, but only if that
data is not used in comparison. For example, a dealer may use the RTRS Web
Portal to correct an inter-dealer trade record with regard to the time of trade
or dealer capacity, but not to correct (or to input initially) the CUSIP
number, par or price of the trade.
• The RTTM Web Portal is operated by NSCC for comparison purposes.[7]
It may be used to report or correct both “comparison data” (CUSIP number, par,
price, etc.) and “regulatory reporting data” (time of trade, etc.), if that
data is associated with an inter-dealer transaction eligible for comparison.
The RTTM Web Portal may not be used to report or correct customer or IDRO trade
records.
All RTRS Portals will be open to
receive trade data for at least 90 minutes after the end of an RTRS Business
Day and 30 minutes before the beginning of the next Business Day, i.e.,
they will be open at least from 7:00 a.m. through 8:00 p.m. The RTRS Web Portal
will be open for an additional 60 minutes at the beginning and end of the RTRS
Business day, i.e., it will be open from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
Measurement of Timely Reporting. The
time taken to report the trade will be measured by comparing the time of trade
reported by the dealer with the time of receipt of the trade report at the
designated RTRS Portal. RTRS will assess each trade against its reporting
deadline (15 minutes, three hours, or end-of-day). Trades not received by the
appropriate reporting deadline will be considered late.
Enhancement of Information Available to
Regulators. MSRB has worked with NASD and other regulators to improve the
audit trail and other surveillance capabilities that will be available once
data is collected on a real-time basis. Some of these changes will require
modifications or additions to existing transaction reporting procedures
observed by dealers. One addition concerns the situation in which one dealer
passes an order to a second dealer for execution directly out of the second
dealer’s principal account, with settlement made directly between the second
dealer and the party placing the order. The situation requiring this
“Inter-Dealer Regulatory-Only or “IDRO” report typically occurs when a fully
disclosed introducing broker submits a customer order to its clearing broker
for execution, and the clearing broker executes and settles directly with the
introducing broker’s customer. The current TRS system requires only one trade
report in this situation – a customer trade report from the introducing
broker. RTRS procedures will require another trade report showing the identity
and role of the clearing broker – it will be described as an Inter-Dealer
Regulatory-Only transaction. The new trade report was requested by the NASD to
provide a more complete audit trail for surveillance purposes.[8]
The current transaction reporting procedures
require a dealer effecting a trade “as agent” for a customer to designate its
capacity on the customer trade report. This requirement will remain in RTRS.
Inter-dealer transaction reports currently do not require a capacity field to
show whether the inter-dealer trade was done as agent for a customer, but RTRS
will add such a requirement.[9]
Another new feature added in the real-time
environment is the Special Condition Code. RTRS will require a dealer that
executes a trade with certain special conditions to code the trade report
accordingly. For example, if there is a specific reason for a trade being
reported at a price that is not a true market price, the dealer will indicate
this with a Special Condition Code. A trade report with a Special Condition
Code that is indicative of an off-market price will not be disseminated by
RTRS, but will be made available to regulatory agencies for market surveillance
and inspection purposes. Some Special Condition Codes will not be indicative
of an off-market price but will report conditions such as a security that is
traded “flat.”[10]
RTRS will also add the reporting of a code by
which a dealer will indicate that a price being reported was derived as part of
a “weighted average price” transaction. A weighted average price transaction
is one in which a dealer agrees to purchase up to a certain quantity of
securities for a customer at market prices during the day, culminating with one
sale transaction to the customer of the aggregate par value, with a price
representing a weighted average of the dealer’s purchases. The Price
Dissemination Plan currently calls for displaying the “weighted average price”
code along with other data about the transaction.
Another data element added for surveillance
purposes is the identifier of an “intermediate dealer” in a transaction. This
applies to a situation in which a dealer is a correspondent of an NSCC participant
and this correspondent passes data to its clearing broker about a trade
effected by a third dealer. Since the dealer that effected the trade is a
correspondent of the clearing broker’s correspondent, this dealer is termed the
“correspondent’s correspondent.” The proposed reporting procedures would
require that if there are three dealers on one side of an inter-dealer trade,
all three dealers must be identified in the trade report: the clearing broker,
its correspondent, and the correspondent’s correspondent. (If there are only
one or two dealers on a side, as will usually be the case, the new
“correspondent’s correspondent” field will be omitted.)
Finally, although it does not require any change
in dealer procedures, RTRS will provide regulators with the record of all
changes reported by a dealer after its initial trade submission. This is an
enhancement over the current system, which reports the results of trade
modifications but does not show the initial submission or the subsequent change
records. RTRS will provide reports to regulators showing each modification or
cancellation of a trade report, including the time the change was made. The
MSRB plans also to provide regulators with real-time connections to RTRS. This
will enable regulatory agency staff to obtain routine reports of transactions
more quickly than is now possible.
RTRS Processing. Following is a
description of key steps in RTRS processing with regard to input requirements,
input data flow, format edits, submitter validation, timestamping, lateness
checking, content validation, feedback, modification and cancellation, and the
maintenance of the surveillance database.
Input Requirements. The basic
transaction information proposed to be reported by a dealer in RTRS will be similar
to that reported in the existing transaction reporting system. This
information supports both the price transparency and surveillance functions of
the system. The complete list of data elements that required on a trade report
are in Specifications for Real-time Reporting of Municipal Securities
Transactions[11]
and will be included within the RTRS Users Manual, available at www.msrb.org.
Input data flow. RTRS receives
information about each trade separately as an electronic message and processes
each trade individually.[12]
All inter-dealer trade messages that contain initial values or modifications to
data elements needed for comparison (e.g., dollar price or par), come to
RTRS as messages via RTTM or as input to the RTTM Web. Inter-dealer trade
messages that affect only data elements needed for regulatory reporting (e.g.,
time of trade) come to RTRS either as messages via the RTTM network, or as
Web-based input via the RTTM Web or RTRS Web. Customer and IDRO messages,
since they contain data needed exclusively for regulatory reporting, come to
RTRS as messages via the RTTM network or as input to the RTRS Web (but not via
the RTTM Web).
Format edits. Each message will be
edited to verify that its format is correct.[13]
This involves checking that required data elements are present in the correct
form (e.g., dates are in date format and money amounts are in decimal
format) and with the correct number of digits or characters. Messages that
fail these edits will not be processed further and an error message describing
the deficiency will be returned to the submitter. Both RTTM and RTRS will
conduct format edits. Input from Web-based screens will have been checked
before it is transferred from the user’s personal computer to the Web server.
Submitter validation. RTRS will accept
input only from parties known to the MSRB. Trade messages routed through RTTM
are checked by RTTM and rejected unless submitted to RTTM by an NSCC
participant. The message is checked again when received by RTRS and it not
processed further unless it bears the identifier of a clearing broker or
service bureau known the MSRB. RTRS further checks each trade message to
verify that the dealer has previously authorized the submitter to report trades
on its behalf. RTRS Web-based input is validated at multiple levels. First,
the user cannot logon to RTRS unless he or she enters a user identifier and
password issued by the MSRB. RTRS security controls allow a dealer access only
to trades in which it was a party or which it has submitted on behalf of
another dealer. Finally, the dealer-submitter combination is validated in the
same way as input from RTTM, above.
Timestamping. To enforce the rule on
timely reporting of trades in real-time environment, each trade message will be
given an electronic timestamp, accurate to the second, when it is received.
RTRS will interpret the timestamp as the time the trade was reported. Messages
that are input into through the Message Portal or the RTTM Web Portal will be
timestamped by RTTM, and messages submitted via the RTRS Web Portal will be
timestamped by the RTRS server. By this means, any delays that may occur in
application processing or telecommunications connections between RTTM and the
MSRB will not affect the assessment of the time the trade was reported.
Lateness checking. The dealer will
include an indicator in the trade message that shows the deadline that it
understands applies to the trade report.[14]
RTRS will determine whether the trade was received by the deadline. If the
dealer indicates it has not traded the security in the previous year and
therefore may report the trade up to three hours after the time of trade, RTRS
will check whether the dealer’s trading history is as claimed. If a trade is
reported late, an error message indicating this fact will be sent to the
submitter at the end of processing.
Content edits. The values in the
reported trade will be checked to determine that they are within reasonable
limits, in order to detect input errors such as misplaced decimal points. The
relationship between values is checked (e.g., the settlement date may
not precede the trade date) and crucial data elements are verified against
reference tables (e.g., the identifier of the dealer that effected the
trade must be present in the RTRS dealer reference table). Finally, for those
trades where the dollar price and yield are reported, the consistency of price
and yield will be verified when possible.
Feedback. If a dealer’s message is
deficient, RTRS interactive feedback will provide descriptive detail. MSRB
anticipates that this feedback will help dealers to detect and correct errors
quickly.
RTRS will generate an acknowledgement or error
message for every reported trade, except inter-dealer trades that have passed
RTTM edits and which do not have any RTRS errors. (These trades will already
have been acknowledged by RTTM.) The acknowledgement/error message is sent to
the dealer and/or submitter in the format(s) that the dealer or submitter has
previously requested. The available feedback formats are message or e-mail.
In addition, the dealer and the submitter may view the trade, and any errors
found, using RTRS Web.
Feedback will indicate to the dealer whether the
trade is error-free or late, and whether it is questionable or unsatisfactory
for reporting purposes. A “questionable” trade message is one that appears to
have an error, but which may be correct depending on circumstances. Examples
are a trade with a yield that exceeds ten percent of the dollar price (bonds
traded very close to a premium call may have a very high nominal yield, but
this is most likely an input error) or a reported time of trade before 0600
hours (trading is allowed at any time of day, but this is most likely intended
to be a time in the afternoon, e.g., 5:00 p.m. reported as 0500). Under
the proposed Rule G-14 RTRS Transaction Reporting Procedures, paragraph (e),
dealers must examine such trade reports to determine if they are in fact
erroneous and, if so, correct them. A trade is “unsatisfactory for reporting
purposes” if it is missing an essential data element, is defective in some way
that prevents it from being processed, or cannot be included in the
surveillance database or publicly reported. Examples of “unsatisfactory”
conditions are a reported trade date in the future, a missing dealer symbol,
and an incorrect CUSIP check digit. Certain modification attempts are also
unsatisfactory, such as a modification that cannot be matched with any previous
message from the dealer.
Modification and cancellation. Under the
proposed rule change, the dealer is responsible for timely and accurate
submission of trade reports. The dealer must monitor its reported trades by
any of the available feedback methods and must correct any errors as soon as
possible. If a dealer is unable to report a trade within the deadline, it must
report the trade as soon as possible. RTRS will produce statistics on dealer
performance in timely submission and timely correction of errors and will
provide the statistics to dealers.
RTRS will enable dealers to submit modify and
cancel messages for all types of trades. Unlike the current transaction
reporting system in which only customer trades can be modified to correct
regulatory data, RTRS will support such changes for all trade types.
Surveillance database. The RTRS
Surveillance Database will store each message submitted by a dealer or service
bureau. Audit trail reports will provide regulators with information about
trades effected by a dealer, trades in specific CUSIPs, highest/lowest prices
for a CUSIP within a day or other time period, and specific data elements such
as trades with Special Condition Codes reported by a dealer. Other reports
will show all modifications and cancellations reported by a dealer.
Testing and Contact Requirements. As
described in connection with the proposed Rule G-14 Procedures, successful
testing will be required of RTRS submitters to ensure a working interface with
RTRS prior to the date for system operations. The proposed Procedures would
require dealers to test their use of RTRS before reporting any trades. The
MSRB will make testing facilities available to dealers at least six months
before the announced effective date of the Proposed Rule Change (“Announced
RTRS Start-Up Date”). Testing would be required of dealers making the
transition from the current Transaction Reporting System to RTRS, and also
required of dealers that begin reporting transactions in the future. Each
dealer will have to be prepared to test its use of RTRS no later than three
months before the Announced RTRS Start-Up Date and must schedule a test date by
that time unless it has already successfully tested its RTRS capabilities.
However, dealers that have effected an average of five or fewer transactions
per week during the preceding year and that will use only the Web-based method
must successfully test their RTRS capabilities one month before the Announced
RTRS Start-Up Date.
The requirement for testing and submission of a
new “Form RTRS” with the name of a contact person is reflected in the new
proposed language for Rule G-14.
Price
Dissemination by RTRS
Description of Service. Real-time price
data will be available by subscription, after subscribers sign an agreement
regarding re-dissemination. During the RTRS Business Day, price data will be
disseminated in real time, immediately after receipt. Modifications and
cancellations submitted by dealers that apply to earlier trade submissions will
also be disseminated in real time.
The technical means of data dissemination are
not yet determined. MSRB expects to make a second filing on the RTRS facility
in the future, with proposals for fees to be charged for the various RTRS data
products. This filing will state the date of effectiveness of the proposed
rule change and describe the technical means of data dissemination.
In addition to real-time reports, the MSRB plans
to continue providing reports each morning covering the previous day’s trades
(T+1 reports), as well as daily reports covering all trades done on the trading
day one week earlier (T+5 reports), and monthly reports covering all trades
done during the previous month.
Trades to be Disseminated. During the
RTRS Business Day, the MSRB will disseminate data on all transactions as soon
as they are received, except for two types of dealer submissions. The
exceptions which, will be stored in the surveillance database but not
disseminated in real-time, are trades marked as by the dealer as having prices
other than market prices, using a Special Condition Code,[15]
and reports of “inter-dealer regulatory-only” transactions. These have already
been described.
List of Information Items to be Disseminated.
The specific items proposed to be disseminated by RTRS for price transparency
purposes are:
•
CUSIP number and description of the issue traded;
•
Par value of the transaction if one million dollars or under;
otherwise reported as s “1MM+”;
•
Dollar price;
•
Yield (for inter-dealer new issue transactions done on a yield
basis and for all customer transactions in non-defaulted securities where the
transaction is done on a yield basis or if the yield can be computed from
dollar price);
•
Date and time of trade;
•
Whether the transaction was a (i) purchase from a customer; (ii)
sale to a customer; or (iii) inter-dealer transaction;
•
Indicator that an inter-dealer transaction was done by a broker’s
broker, and if so, the broker’s broker role as buyer or seller;
•
When-issued indicator, if any;
•
Syndicate list price indicator, if any;
•
Assumed settlement date, if initial settlement date is not known
at time of trade;
•
Indicator that dollar price was computed by MSRB using an
estimated settlement date for an issue on which the initial settlement date has
not been set;
•
Indicator that a trade was done at the weighted average price of
trades done earlier in the day;
•
Modification/Cancellation indicator, if any;
•
RTRS broadcast time, date and sequential trade message number;
and
•
RTRS Control Number.
Transactions Done During RTRS
Business Day. As noted, under the proposed rule language, dealers would
with limited exceptions report within 15 minutes of the time of trade all
transactions done during the RTRS Business Day. Trade submissions made during
the RTRS Business Day will be disseminated within a few minutes of receipt.
Dissemination of Compared or Uncompared
Inter-Dealer Trades. Unless the trade report contains errors or is subject
to an exception, transactions reported by dealers during the RTRS Business Day
would be disseminated within a few minutes after receipt at the designated RTRS
Portal. The current plan for dissemination of prices calls for inter-dealer
price information to be published only after comparison is achieved on the
trade, as done in the current system. Comparison of the inter-dealer trade
ensures the reliability of the data that was submitted, since the buyer’s and
the seller’s details are matched. However, RTRS is being designed with the
flexibility to disseminate uncompared inter-dealer transaction data if it is
found that a substantial proportion of trades take longer than 15 minutes to be
compared.[16]
Transactions Done Outside the RTRS Business Day.
Under the proposed rule change, dealers would be required to report
transactions done outside of the RTRS Business Day, but would not be required
to do son on a real-time basis. Instead, trades would be reported within the
first 15 minutes of the next RTRS Business Day, at which time they would be
disseminated.
Late Trade Reports and Trade Data Modifications.
Trades that are not reported within the timeframe set by the proposed rule
change would be considered late. Late trade reports and trade modifications
will be disseminated RTRS as soon as received if they are submitted during the
RTRS Business Day and at the start of the next Business Day otherwise.
Broker’s Broker Indicator. Trades
by broker’s brokers will be marked as such on disseminated trade reports and
the buy/sell indicator will show whether the broker’s broker was buying or
selling. Because broker’s broker trades occur in matched pairs that, in market
terms, many observers view as representing one movement of securities between
two dealers, the Board believes it will be helpful to RTRS data users if
broker’s broker trades are identified as such in trade reports.
Implementation Schedule
RTRS development is proceeding on the following
schedule.
2004
April Beta testing with
dealers begins
July Certification testing with
dealers begins
July-Dec. Dealers that have passed
certification testing with RTTM and RTRS
may report trades using new formats
October Dealers that have not yet
completed certification testing must schedule
test, unless dealer reports an average of fewer than five trades
per week (low-volume dealers)
November Low-volume dealers that have not
yet completed certification testing must
schedule test
Dec. 15 All dealers must complete
certification testing
2005
January Real-time comparison and reporting
requirements would become effective
[1] NSCC is a clearing agency registered under the Securities
Exchange Act.
[2] For RTTM message specifications, see Interactive
Messaging: NSCC Participant Specifications for Matching Input and
Output Version 1.0 (March 31, 2003), and “Modifications to RTTM Messaging
Specifications,” FICC CMU RTTM New Project Update Issue 6 (April 20, 2004), on www.ficc.com.
[3] By agreement with the MSRB, NSCC will not charge dealers for
serving as the portal for customer transaction data, but MSRB will
reimburse NSCC for any system costs that are attributable exclusively to
this function.
[4] The ISO 15022 format is also used by NSCC’s parent organization,
the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation, for processing government,
mortgage-backed, corporate, and unit interest trustsecurities.
[5] See “Operational Overview of MSRB’s Real-Time Transaction
Reporting System,” MSRSB Notice 2003-13 (April 7, 2003), on www.msrb.org.
[6] Use of the Message Portal for trade comparison is currently
restricted to NSCC participants.
[7] Use of the RTTM Web Portal is restricted to NSCC participants.
[8] To satisfy the need for this audit trail requirement the
execution of the order by the clearing broker for the correspondent will be
considered to constitute an inter-dealer “transaction” between the two
dealers even though no principal position transfers between the two dealers.
(The principal position in these situations moves directly from
the clearing broker to the customer.) If a principal position
does transfer between dealers, the trade is an “Inter-dealer Transaction
Eligible for Comparison,” and the trade must be compared and
reported, even though settlement between the parties may occur only as a
movement on the books of the clearing broker. This is consistent with existing
G-14 policy in TRS.
[9] The dealer is not required to link the inter-dealer and customer
transaction reports associated with agency transactions.
[10] The MSRB in its June 2003 Notice requesting comment on plans for
real-time reporting (discussed below), referred to some of what are now
termed Special Condition Codes as “Special Price Reason Codes.”
[11] See “Revised Specifications for the Real-Time Transaction
Reporting System, Version 1.2,” MSRB Notice 2004-2 (January 23,
2004), on www.msrb.org.
[12] Screen input through either Web Portal is converted into message
format by the appropriate Web server and sent from that server to the RTRS
host computer.
[13] Message formats are defined in detail in the Specifications for
Real-time Reporting of Municipal Securities.
[14] As noted, trades must be reported within 15 minutes of the time of
trade, except for new issue trades by syndicate managers or members
at the list price (for which the deadline is the end of the first day
of trading), trades in variable rate products or commercial paper (for which
the deadline is the end of trade date), and trades in securities
which the dealer has not traded in the previous year (for which the deadline
is three hours from the time of trade).
[15] In an inter-dealer trade, if either dealer indicates the trade was
done at a special price, RTRS considers the entire trade to be a
special price trade.
[16] Unlike inter-dealer transactions, which have two submissions (both
a buy side and a sell side) that must be compared, customer trades, which
comprise approximately 80% of all reported trades, do not require
comparison and will be disseminated as soon as automated error checks are completed.
* * * * *
File No. SR-MSRB-2004-06 (October 25, 2004); SEC Approval
Order Release No. 34-50820 (December 8, 2004)
Real-Time Transaction
Price Service
In January 2005, the MSRB plans to begin operation
of the Real-Time Transaction Price Service to disseminate municipal securities
transaction prices in real-time. The Service will be available by subscription
for an annual fee of $5,000 and will be a part of the MSRB’s Real-Time
Transaction Reporting System (“RTRS”). RTRS will bring real-time price
transparency to the municipal securities market and will make other
improvements in the transparency and market surveillance functions of the
MSRB’s current transaction reporting program.
Description
The Service will be available by subscription and
will provide a real-time stream of data representing municipal securities
transaction reports made by brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers
(“dealers”) to RTRS.[1]
After receipt of a trade report from a dealer, RTRS will automatically check
the report for errors, ensure that it is a valid trade report for
dissemination, appropriately format the report, and make it available for
immediate electronic transmittal to each subscriber.[2]
The real-time data stream will be in the form of
messages and will be available either over the Internet or by leased line, at
the subscriber’s option.[3]
The subscriber must use either the MQ Series[4]
or a TCP Socket connection for messaging with RTRS. Messages representing
trade reports will be sent out by the Service based on the order that they are
received at RTRS, i.e., on a “first in-first out” basis.[5] The Service also will offer a “Day
Replay” file containing all messages sent during the day, in case a subscriber
needs to check its records for completeness of recovery from communication
breaks.[6]
Hours of Operation. The
“RTRS Business Day,” during which time dealers are required by Rule G-14 to
submit trade reports within 15 minutes of execution, begins at 7:30 a.m. and
ends at 6:30 p.m.[7]
However, RTRS will actually accept, and the Service will disseminate,
any trade reports received between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. (“RTRS
‘Window’ Hours”).[8]
Transaction reports submitted to RTRS after 8:00 p.m. will not be processed by
RTRS but will be pended for processing and dissemination at 7: 00 a.m. the next
business day.[9]
Transaction Data Disseminated.
The data contained in each transaction price report sent to subscribers is
discussed in detail in the RTRS filing.[10]
It will include the same transaction information now disseminated in the MSRB’s
existing overnight batch system of transaction reporting, with additional data
elements that have been added for real-time transaction reporting. The
specific items of information that will be disseminated are:
Message Type
Type of message
sent in the real-time broadcast (i.e., a trade message, a “heartbeat”
message or a system message). Heartbeat messages will be sent once every
60 seconds in the absence of real-time transaction messages to indicate that the
connection is working properly but that there are no messages to send. System
messages will be sent to indicate the daily open and close of the RTRS real-time
subscriber service and to notify subscribers if publishing will be intentionally
interrupted during system hours (e.g., the markets have been closed because
of extraordinary circumstances).
Sequential
Number
Unique sequential
number of the trade message. If more than one message has been published
for a trade due to modification or cancellation, the trade is uniquely
identified by the RTRS ID described below.
RTRS Control
Number
The RTRS
ID for the transaction. This may be used to apply subsequent modifications
and cancellations to an initial transaction.
Trade Type
Indicator
Type of
trade: an inter-dealer trade, a purchase from a customer by a dealer, or a sale
to a customer by a dealer.
Transaction
Type Indicator
An indicator
showing whether the message is a new transaction, or modifies or cancels a
previously disseminated transaction.
CUSIP
The CUSIP number
of the issue traded.
Security
Description
Text description
of the security obtained from the CUSIP Service Bureau.
Dated Date
Dated date of the
issue traded obtained from the CUSIP Service Bureau.
Coupon (if
available)
Interest rate of
the issue traded (blank for zero-coupon bonds) obtained from the CUSIP
Service Bureau.
Maturity
Date
Maturity date of
the issue traded obtained from the CUSIP Service Bureau.
When-Issued
Indicator (if applicable)
Indicates whether
the issue traded on or before the issue’s initial settlement date obtained
from Standard and Poors.
Assumed
Settlement Date (if applicable)
For new issues
where the initial settlement date is not known at the time of execution,
this field is a date 15 business days after trade date. If this field is populated
there will be no data in the settlement date field.
Trade Date
The date the trade
was executed as reported by the dealer.
Time of
Trade
The time of trade
execution as reported by the dealer.
Settlement
Date (if known)
The settlement
date of the trade if reported by the dealer will be shown. If this field
is populated there will be no data in assumed settlement date field.
Par Traded
The par value of
the trade as reported by the dealer will be shown. Trades with a par
amount over $1 million will show par value as “1MM+” until five days after the
stated trade date.
Dollar Price
The
dollar price of the trade will be shown, as reported by the dealer. In
most inter-dealer trade reports, the dealer is not required to report a
dollar price and the dollar price shown is calculated by the MSRB from the
final monies, par value and accrued interest reported for the trade.
Yield (if
applicable)
For customer
trades, this field shows the yield of the trade as reported by the dealer.
This normally is the same yield that would appear on a confirmation of the
trade. For some customer trades (e.g., trades defaulted securities,
certain securities with variable interest rates) a yield cannot be reported by
the dealer. On inter-dealer trades, yield is not generally
reported by the dealer and is not shown.
Broker’s
Broker Indicator (if applicable)
An indicator used
in inter-dealer transactions that were executed by a broker’s broker,
including whether it was a purchase or sale by the broker’s broker.
Weighted
Price Indicator (if applicable)
An indicator that
the transaction price was a “weighted average price” based on multiple
transactions done at different prices earlier in the day to accumulate the par
amount needed to execute an order for a customer.
Syndicate
Price Indicator (if applicable)
An indicator
showing that the transaction price was reported as a trade in a new issue
by a syndicate manager or syndicate member at the list offering price on the first
day of trading.
RTRS
Broadcast Date
The date the
message was published to subscribers.
RTRS
Broadcast Time
The time the
message was first disseminated to subscribers.
Version
Number
Version number of
the message or file format used in the message or file.
Subscription Fee. The Real-Time Service
will be available by subscription for an annual fee of $5,000.[11] Subscribers will be allowed
to re-disseminate transaction data to an unlimited number of their own
customers or clients at no additional charge. By not charging for or
restricting re-distribution of the transaction data, the MSRB wishes to
encourage information vendors -- and various other entities that make
securities data available to members of the securities industry and the public
-- to use the transaction data in their products and services. The MSRB
will also encourage those parties to re-disseminate the data, either in its
original form or with enhancements to address the specific needs of specific
data users.[12]
Through this approach, the MSRB anticipates that it will be possible for a
typical individual investor to obtain the transaction data that is relevant to
his or her investments for free or at a very modest cost.[13] After its first year of
operation, the MSRB will review the usage of the real-time data feed to ensure
that this goal is being met and that the data is readily available to municipal
market participants and others who need the data.
Other Transparency Reports Under RTRS
In addition to offering the Real-Time
Service, RTRS will continue to provide the primary transparency reports that
have been developed within the current transaction reporting program. The
data fields in these products will be modified for consistency with the
real-time transaction data fields noted above and formatted to reflect that the
data is being disseminated in files containing multiple transactions, rather
than in real-time, “trade by trade,” messages.[14]
The existing “Trade Detail Report”
(also known as the “T+1 Report”) contains the trade reports for a specific
trade date and is made available at approximately 6:00 a.m. on the business day
following trade date (“T+1”). It is provided in the form of an electronic
file and is made available over the Internet. After RTRS is operational,
the Trade Detail Report will be reformatted and renamed the “T+1 Transaction
Price Service.” Subscriptions will remain free to any interested person.
The existing “Daily Comprehensive
Report” also is used to disseminate trade reports for a specific trade date,
but is made available five business days after that trade date (“T+5”).[15] In RTRS, this service will be
renamed the “Comprehensive Transaction Price Service.” The service will
be made available exclusively through electronic file download over the
Internet in the same format and manner as the T+1 Transaction Price
Service. As is the case for the Comprehensive Reports produced today, the
trade records in the new comprehensive service will: (i) include exact par
values for those transactions with a par value over $1 million; (ii) show all
late trade reports made after the specified trade date, up until the date of
dissemination: and (iii) show the effect of modifications or cancellations
submitted by dealers after trade date. The annual fee for this service will be
$2,000 – the same fee currently charged for the existing Comprehensive
Reports. Under RTRS, subscribers to the Real-Time Price Dissemination
Service will receive a subscription to the Comprehensive Price Data Service at
no additional charge.
[1] Modifications and cancellation messages submitted by dealers will
also be disseminated in realtime.
[2] The MSRB anticipates that, during peak traffic periods, these
automated functions will be accomplished within two minutes, and during
lighter periods will be accomplished within a few seconds.
Certain trade reports made by dealers,
which are coded by the dealers to indicate that the trade is for a specific
reason not done at a market price, will not be disseminated but will be
available to regulators as part of the surveillance function offered by RTRS.
Certain other types of “transactions” that are required to be
reported exclusively for audit trail purposes (relating to clearing
brokers and their correspondents in certain fully-disclosed clearing arrangements
where the correspondent does not take a principal position) also will
not be disseminated but will be available to regulators.
[3] Subscribers will be responsible for all telecommunications charges
for leased lines.
[4] To receive real-time trade messages via MQ Series, subscribers must
license and configure their own MQ software.
[5] If a subscriber detects that a message or a series of messages was
missed during the day, the subscriber can request a trade message
replay or “snapshot.”
[6] The MSRB also maintains a hot-site from which it will provide
real-time feed subscribers with a second source for the feed in the
event that it can longer be broadcast from the RTRS primary site.
[7] All times given are in Eastern Time.
[8] The RTRS “window” hours provide extra time before the Business Day
and after the Business Day for dealers that may need to report late
trades or correct mistakes that are discovered after the close of the
Business Day. The 8:00 p.m. closing time for the window is intended to allow
time for certain kinds of trades that, pursuant to Rule G-14,
are permitted to be reported at the “end of day” for operational reasons
(e.g., syndicate trades executed at list price). These can be reported
up until 8:00 p.m. when the RTRS “window” closes.
[9] In addition, at 7:00 a.m. RTRS will send modifications showing
exact par values for transactions that were initially broadcast with a
par value of “1MM+.” As described in the RTRS filing, because of concerns
regarding liquidity, transactions with a par value exceeding $1 million will initially
be disseminated with a par value of “1MM+.” Five business days after trade
date, the actual par value will be shown.
[10] File No. SR-MSRB-2004-02 (June 1, 2004); see also “Real-Time
Transaction Reporting: Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change to
Rules G-14 and G-12(f),” MSRB Notice 2004-13 (June 1, 2004) at www.msrb.org. The SEC approved this filing on
August 31, 2004, in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 50294; see
also “Approval by the SEC of Real-Time Transaction Reporting
and Price Dissemination,” MSRB Notice 2004-29 (Sept. 2, 2004), at www.msrb.org.
[11] The $5,000 subscription price will cover the administrative and
technical costs associated with disseminating data and supporting
subscription accounts. The MSRB is not attempting to levy revenues
from the Service to cover all RTRS costs.
[12] Although the transaction data collected by the MSRB is not restricted
with respect to re- dissemination, there are certain restrictions on use of
the proprietary “CUSIP numbers and CUSIP Securities Descriptions.”
These are contained within the Subscription Agreement for the Service.
[13] The MSRB, for example, has received an indication from The Bond Market Association (“BMA”) that the real-time data will be made available in real-time on the BMA’s free web site(www.investinginbonds.com) which
contains information on the fixed income markets.
[14] Approximately six months after RTRS becomes operational, the MSRB
will retire certain redundant reports, and will combine the monthly and
daily comprehensive reports into one service.
[15] Subscribers to the T+5 Report also have access to a T+20 Report
that contains transactions showing the effects of any
modifications received at RTRS since the T+5 Report was produced. Data
formats in reports created before RTRS became operational may be those that
were in use at the time they were created. Any interested party may
contact the MSRB for technical information about these older
reports.
* * * *
*
File No. SR-MSRB-2004-07 (November 15, 2004); SEC Approval Order Release
No. 34-50692 (November 18, 2004)
Implementation Plan
As announced in MSRB Notice 2003-44, dated December 11, 2003,
the MSRB is implementing its real-time transaction reporting requirements for
brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers (collectively, “dealers”) in
January 2005. The implementation plan for the January transition is described
below.
The conversion to real-time transaction reporting
requires dealers and the MSRB to implement new systems and procedures for
transaction reporting. Trade reporting will be accomplished through a new MSRB
system -- the Real-Time Transaction Reporting System (“RTRS”). The two major
components of RTRS with which dealers will interface are: (i) the RTRS Web
Portal for inputting trade data and reviewing the status of trade reports
within RTRS; and (ii) the message-based trade input and feedback facility
operated by National Securities Clearing Corporation (the “Message Portal”).
These are described in the RTRS Operational Plan contained in MSRB Notice
2003-44 and in the RTRS Message Specifications and other explanatory documents
subsequently published at www.msrb.org.
To facilitate a smooth transition to dealer use of
the Web Portal and the Message Portal, implementation will occur in two phases
on January 10 and January 31, 2005. Dealers will be required to incorporate
use of the RTRS Web Portal into their transaction reporting procedures on
January 10, on which date the MSRB also will convert its internal production
processing and dealer-feedback systems to RTRS formats. Accomplishing this
transition on January 10 will allow the MSRB and dealers to resolve any
implementation issues associated with these system changes prior to the January
31 date for mandatory real-time trade reporting by all dealers. On January 31,
the amendments to Rule G-12(f) and Rule G-14 that require real-time
inter-dealer comparison and transaction reporting will become effective, use of
the Message Portal will become mandatory, and the MSRB will begin real-time
dissemination of trades in transparency reports.
Further details on the changes that will occur on January 10 and
January 31 as part of the implementation plan are described below.
January 10, 2005 – On this date, the
MSRB will convert its own production system for processing transaction reports
to RTRS. Dealers will not be required by rule to report in real-time on this
date but will be encouraged to do so to ease the transition when real-time reporting
becomes mandatory on January 31. On January 10, the RTRS database will become
the “database of record” and dealers will need to employ the RTRS Web browser
in their production environment. It should be noted that dealers that have
tested successfully can already convert to real-time comparison and trade
reporting procedures, although without all of the “feedback” functionally that
will become available in the production environment on January 10. The MSRB’s
conversion to RTRS as the production processing system on January 10will
allow the MSRB to give these dealers full RTRS “feedback” capability on that
date.
There will be no change in the timing of
transparency reports on January 10. However, subscribers to the existing
transparency reports can begin receiving T+1 reports in the RTRS revised record
formats (including the new fields of trade information offered by RTRS) on that
date. The following features of the existing transaction reporting system will
be changed or terminated on January 10:
• The old “batch” style formats for reporting inter-dealer and
customer trades through NSCC will still be accepted, but the deadline for
reporting customer trades will be changed from midnight to 10:00 pm. The
deadline for inter-dealer trade reports will remain 8:00 p.m.
• Because of the MSRB’s change to RTRS as the production processing
system, dealers must use 16-digit (rather than 20-digit) control numbers to
identify trades, both in real-time and in batch trade reports. Only 16-digit
control numbers will be returned to dealers in message feedback.
• Regardless of whether a dealer is using the new RTRS formats or
old batch style formats, the MSRB will discontinue sending “feedback”
information in batch files and faxes for customer trades. Real-time system responses,
e-mails and RTRS Web instead will be available to provide feedback to dealers
on their trade reports.
• Dealers who submit their low-volume trade input through the
current “TRS dial-up” facility must convert to the RTRS Web Portal by January
10.
January 31, 2005– On this date, the amendments to Rule G-14, on
transaction reporting, and Rule G-12(f), on automated comparison of
inter-dealer transactions, will become fully effective, requiring securities
transactions to be reported, in most cases, within 15 minutes of the time of
trade execution. Use of RTRS trade reporting formats and procedures will become
mandatory and the old “batch” style reporting formats will no longer be
compliant with Rules G-12(f) and G-14. (The MSRB will discontinue its support
of the non-compliant trade reporting methodology soon after January 31.) The
MSRB will make real-time transaction price data available to subscribers to its
Real-Time Transaction Price Service beginning on this date.