On September 24, 2002, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board (the “Board” or “MSRB”) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) a proposed rule
change regarding its Transaction Reporting Program.[1] In its filing, the Board proposes to change its Daily Transaction
Report Service (the “Service”) in order to provide a greater
amount of information to the public and thereby increase transparency
in the market. The proposed rule change will not be effective
until approved by the SEC.
Currently the Service provides a daily public report with details
of each transaction in any municipal security that was traded
three or more times on the previous day. Under the proposed
rule change, the threshold for reporting a municipal security
would change from three to two trades per day and, as a result,
the number of trades reported each day would increase substantially.
Background
The Board has a long-standing policy to increase price transparency
in the municipal securities market, with the ultimate goal of
disseminating comprehensive and contemporaneous pricing data.
Since 1994, the Board has made ongoing efforts to increase price
transparency in the municipal securities market in measured
steps, culminating in comprehensive, real-time price transparency.
The first price transparency report, begun in 1995, was a report,
published the day after trading (“T+1”), that summarized inter-dealer
trades in frequently traded municipal securities. In 1998,
the Board added customer trades to the T+1 summary reports,
and in January 2000 began, as well, to publish individual transaction
data on frequently traded securities. The Board has also introduced
“comprehensive” transaction reports for this market, which list
all municipal securities transactions (regardless of frequency
of trading), but which are available no less than one week after
trade date.[2]
One product of the Board’s Transaction Reporting Program is
its Daily Transaction Report. The report is made available
to subscribers each morning by 7:00 am and includes details
of transactions in municipal securities which were “frequently
traded” the previous business day. From the beginning of the
Transaction Reporting Program in 1994 through the spring of
2002, “frequently traded” securities were defined as those that
were traded four or more times on a given business day. In
May 2002, the Board lowered the definition of “frequently
traded” to securities that were traded three or more times on
a given day.[3]
When transparency was initially being introduced into the municipal
securities market, the Board was concerned that an observer
unfamiliar with the market might mistake an isolated reported
transaction or pair of transactions as providing a reliable
indicator of “market price.” Because of this concern, the Board
adopted the “frequently traded” threshold of four trades. At
the same time, the Board has made a commitment to review the
use of these reports as experience is obtained and eventually
to move to transparency reporting on a more contemporaneous
and comprehensive basis.[4]
At this time, the Board believes that the next appropriate
step in this process is to change the threshold for determining
that information about a municipal security is to be disseminated
in the T+1 Daily Transaction Report. The proposed rule change
would lower the threshold from three to two trades per day.
Impact of Proposed Report on Transparency
The proposed threshold would increase substantially the proportion
of municipal securities market activity that is reported on
the day after trading. On a typical day, there are approximately
26,000 transactions in about 10,000 issues, with a total par
value traded of about $9.5 billion. The present Daily Transaction
Report, with a threshold of three or more trades per day, includes
an average of 14,400 trades in 2,600 different issues, with
a total par value of about $5.2 billion. Under the proposed
threshold, the report is expected to include an average of 19,760
trades in 5,600 issues, with a total par value of about $7.7
billion. This represents a 37 percent increase in the number
of trades reported, a more-than-twofold increase in the number
of issues reported, and a 48 percent increase in par value reported.[5]
Description of Service
The enhanced Daily Transaction Report with the two-trade threshold
will replace the current report and will be made available each
day to subscribers via the Internet. Subscribers to the current
Service receive the report free of charge, and their subscriptions
will continue should the proposed Service be implemented. New
subscriptions will be available free to parties who sign a subscription
agreement. In addition, recent reports will continue to be
available for examination, also free of charge, at the Board’s
Public Access Facility in Alexandria, VA.
Implementation Schedule
The enhanced report will be available to subscribers as soon
as practical after SEC approval of the proposed rule change.
It is estimated that the period between approval and implementation
will not exceed two weeks.
Summary of Comments
Written comments on the proposed rule change were not solicited,
but the Board had earlier received a comment letter from The
Bond Market Association (“TBMA”) in reference to the August
2002 change to the comprehensive daily report, in which TBMA
also commented on the Board’s announced plan to lower the threshold
to two trades.[6]
In its letter, TBMA expressed its continued support for the
Board’s steps to expand transparency in the municipal securities
market. TBMA also stated its belief that T+1 dissemination
of information on bonds that have traded at least twice a day
“would provide useful information to investors and other market
participants and is not likely to have a deleterious impact
on the market for such bonds or mislead investors.”[7]
TBMA did state a reservation regarding the method of counting
trades toward the reporting threshold. TBMA believes that when
a dealer “matches or crosses purchase and sale transactions,”
this constitutes a single trade because this is the economic
reality of such transactions, regardless of whether dealers
report two transactions to the MSRB.[8]
Consistent with the Board’s previous decisions,[9]
the transaction reporting system will continue to treat two
transactions that constitute “matched” or “crossed” transactions
like any other trades. In the general case, only the dealer
that effects a purchase and subsequent sale could identify the
two trades as crossed agency trades or matched riskless principal
transactions. The transaction reporting system does not require
dealers to match the two sides of agency trades nor specifically
to match or identify riskless principal transactions. Therefore,
it is not possible to count those trades differently in the
current system for purposes of the T+1 reporting threshold.
September 24, 2002
[1] File No. SR-MSRB-2002-10. Comments on
the proposed rule change may be made to the Commission and
should refer to this file number.
[2] The first comprehensive report was introduced
in October 2000 and listed all trades after a one-month delay.
The latest comprehensive report began operation in August
2002 and has a one-week delay. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 46380 (August 19, 2002), 67 FR 54831-54832
(August 26, 2002).
[3] See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 45861 (May 1, 2002). 67 FR 30989-30990.
[4] See, e.g., “Board to Proceed with
Pilot Program to Disseminate Inter-Dealer Transaction Information,”
MSRB Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1 (January 1994). In its
approval order for the Inter-Dealer Daily Report, the Securities
and Exchange Commission noted that the Board, in proceeding
to subsequent levels of transparency, “should continue to
work toward publicly disseminating the maximum level of useful
information to the public while ensuring that the information
and manner in which it is presented is not misleading.” See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34955 (November 9, 1994),
59 FR 59810 (November 18, 1994).
[5] These data are based upon market activity
from April 1, 2001 through July 31, 2001.
[6] See letter from Frank Chin, Chair,
Municipal Executive Committee, The Bond Market Association,
to Jonathan G. Katz, Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, dated August 8, 2002.
[9] In 1994, a similar suggestion was made
by a commentator with reference to the Board’s filing which
initiated the transaction reporting program. The commentator,
a brokers’ broker, suggested that the Board should count as
one transaction the situation in which a brokers’ broker purchases
securities from a dealer and sells them to another dealer.
The Board noted in its reply that these are “riskless principal”
transactions and that other dealers may also do riskless principal
transactions. The Board noted that its transaction reporting
system would treat the sale to the intermediate dealer (e.g.,
the brokers’ broker) and the intermediate dealer’s subsequent
sale as two transactions, and that it would treat these trades
like any other trades.