Select regulatory documents by category:
1. American Municipal Securities, Inc.: Letter from John C. Petagna, Jr., President, dated April 26, 2011
2. Barker, Bill: E-mail dated April 18, 2011
3. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Mike Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated April 21, 2011
4. Chapdelaine & Co.: Letter from August J. Hoerrner, President, dated May 5, 2011
5. Conners & Company, Inc.: E-mail from Jay White dated April 13, 2011
6. Foard, Dale: E-mail dated April 21, 2011
7. Hartfield, Titus & Donnelly, LLC: Letter from Mark J. Epstein, President and Chief Executive Officer, dated April 21, 2011
8. KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc.: E-mail from Michael A. Burrello, Managing Director, Municipal Trading and Underwriting, dated April 21, 2011
9. Kiley Partners, Inc.: E-mail from Michael Kiley dated April 12, 2011
10. Knight BondPoint: Letter from Marshall Nicholson, Managing Director, dated April 21, 2011
11. M.E. Allison & Co., Inc.: E-mail from Christopher R. Allison, Chief Financial Officer, dated April 20, 2011
12. National Alliance Securities: E-mail from Bob Barnette, Municipal Trader, dated April 21, 2011
13. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.: Letter from Marty Campbell, Senior Director, Municipal Underwriting & Trading
14. Potratz, Jay: E-mail dated April 21, 2011
15. R. Seelaus & Co., Inc.: E-mail from Richard Seelaus dated April 13, 2011
16. Regional Brokers, Inc.: Letter from Joseph A. Hemphill, III, CEO, and H. Deane Armstrong, CCO, dated April 21, 2011
17. Regional Brokers, Inc.: Letter from Joseph A. Hemphill, III, President and CEO, and H. Deane Armstrong, CCO, dated May 12, 2011
18. RH Investment Corporation: Letter from Andrew L. "Bud" Byrnes, III, Chief Executive Officer, dated April 21, 2011
19. Robbins, Leonard Jack: Letter dated May 1, 2011
20. RW Smith & Associates, Inc.: Letter from Paige W. Pierce, President and CEO, dated April 27, 2011
21. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated April 29, 2011
22. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated April 29, 2011
23. Seidel & Shaw, LLC: Letter from Thomas W. Shaw, President
24. Sentinel Brokers Company, Inc.: E-mail from Joseph M. Lawless, President, dated April 12, 2011
25. Sentinel Brokers Company, Inc.: E-mail from Joseph M. Lawless, President, dated April 13, 2011
26. Seven Points Capital: E-mail from Jerry Racasi dated April 13, 2011
27. Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated: E-mail from Andy Jackson dated April 20, 2011
28. Stoever Glass & Co.: Letter from Frederick J. Stoever, President, dated April 15, 2011
29. TheMuniCenter, LLC: Letter from Thomas S. Vales, Chief Executive Officer, dated April 21, 2011
30. Tradeweb Markets LLC: Letter from John Cahalane, Managing Director, Head of Tradeweb Retail, dated May 3, 2011
31. Walsh, John: E-mail dated April 21, 2011
32. Wiley Bros.-Aintree Capital, LLC: E-mail from Keener Billups, Managing Director, dated April 26, 2011, corrects Wiley Bros.-Aintree Capital, LLC: E-mail from Keener Billups, Managing Director, dated April 13, 2011
33. William Blair: E-mail from Tom Greene dated April 21, 2011
34. Welbourn, Steve: E-mail dated April 21, 2011
35. Wolfe & Hurst Bond Brokers, Inc.: Letter from O. Gene Hurst, President, dated April 25, 2011, corrects Wolfe & Hurst Bond Brokers, Inc.: Letter from O. Gene Hurst, President, dated April 21, 2011
36. Ziegler Capital Markets: E-mail from Kathleen R. Murphy dated April 13, 2011
1. Catholic Finance Corporation: Letter from Michael P. Schaefer, Executive Director, dated February 16, 2011
2. Catholic Finance Corporation: Letter from Michael P. Schaefer, Executive Director, dated April 5, 2011
3. Fisher, Robert: E-mail dated April 6, 2011
4. Municipal Regulatory Consulting LLC: Letter from David Levy, Principal, dated April 1, 2011
5. National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Colette J. Irwin-Knott, President, dated April 1, 2011
6. Public Financial Management, Inc.: Letter from Joseph J. Connolly, General Counsel, dated April 4, 2011
7. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated April 5, 2011
8. WM Financial Strategies: Letter from Joy A. Howard, Principal, dated April 2, 2011
1. American Bankers Association: Letter from Cristeena G. Naser, Senior Counsel, dated April 11, 2011
2. American Council of Engineering Companies: Letter from David A. Raymond, President and CEO, dated April 11, 2011
3. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees: Letter from Gerald W. McEntee, International President, dated April 11, 2011
4. American Governmental Financial Services: E-mail from Robert Doty, President, dated April 11, 2011
5. B-Payne Group: Letter from John B. Payne, Principal, dated March 28, 2011
6. Education Finance Council: Letter from Vince Sampson, President, dated April 11, 2011
7. Fi360: Letter from Blaine F. Aikin, CEO, and Kristina A. Fausti, Director of Legal and Regulatory Affairs, dated April 11, 2011
8. Lewis Young Robertson & Burningham, Inc.: Letter from Scott J. Robertson, Principal, dated April 11, 2011
9. Michigan Bankers Association: Letter from Richard D. Lavolette, General Counsel
10. Municipal Regulatory Counsulting LLC: Letter from David Levy, Principal, dated April 11, 2011
11. National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Colette J. Irwin-Knott, President, dated April 11, 2011
12. Not For Profit Capital Strategies: E-mail from Ed Crouch, dated February 14, 2011
13. Phoenix Advisors, LLC: E-mail from Peter G. Egan, Managing Director, dated March 3, 2011
14. Phoenix Advisors, LLC: E-mail from Peter G. Egan, Managing Director, dated March 4, 2011
15. Public Financial Management: Letter from Joseph J. Connolly, General Counsel, dated April 8, 2011
16. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated April 11, 2011
17. Wisconsin Bankers Association: Letter from Rose Oswald Poels, Interim CEO/President, dated April 11, 2011
1. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees: Letter from Gerald W. McEntee, International President, dated April 11, 2011
2. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Mike Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated April 11, 2011
3. Municipal Regulatory Consulting LLC: Letter from David Levy, Principal, dated April 11, 2011
4. National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Colette J. Irwin-Knott, President, dated April 11, 2011
5. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated April 11, 2011
1. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees: Letter from Gerald W. McEntee, International President, dated April 11, 2011
2. American Governmental Financial Services: E-mail from Robert Doty, President, dated April 11, 2011
3. B-Payne Group: Letter from John B. Payne, Principal, dated March 28, 2011
4. Catholic Finance Corporation: Letter from Michael P. Schaefer, Executive Director, dated April 11, 2011
5. Municipal Regulatory Consulting LLC: Letter from David Levy, Principal, dated April 11, 2011
6. National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Colette J. Irwin-Knott, President, dated April 11, 2011
7. Not For Profit Capital Strategies: E-mail from Ed Crouch, dated February 14, 2011
8. Public Financial Management: Letter from Joseph J. Connolly, General Counsel, dated April 8, 2011
9. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated April 11, 2011
1. Acacia Financial Group, Inc.: Letter from Kim M. Whelan, Co-President, dated February 25, 2011
2. American Bankers Association: Letter from Cristeena G. Naser, Senior Counsel, dated February 25, 2011
3. American Governmental Financial Services: E-mail from Robert Doty, President, dated March 1, 2011
4. BMO Capital Markets GKST Inc.: Letter from Robert J. Stracks, Counsel, dated February 25, 2011
5. Callcott, W. Hardy: Letter dated February 8, 2011
6. Fisher, Robert: E-mail dated February 25, 2011
7. G.L. Hicks Financial LLC: E-mail from Dareth Goulding, dated January 14, 2011
8. H.J. Umbaugh & Associates: Letter from Gerald G. Malone, dated February 24, 2011
9. National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Colette Irwin-Knott, President, dated February 24, 2011
10. Repex & Co., Inc.: E-mail from Erich Sokolower, dated January 14, 2011
11. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated February 25, 2011
12. State of Texas: Letter from Susan Combs, Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, dated February 25, 2011
13. State of Texas: Letter from Charles B. McDonald, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Attorney General of Texas, dated February 25, 2011
14. T. Rowe Price: Letter from David Oestreicher, Chief Legal Counsel, dated February 25, 2011
15. The PFM Group: Letter from Joseph J. Connolly, General Counsel, dated February 23, 2011
16. WM Financial Strategies: Letter from Joy A. Howard, Principal, dated February 21, 2011
Executing Broker Symbols: Rule G-14
MSRB Rule G-14 on Transaction Reporting requires that every dealer obtain an executing broker symbol, if one has not already been assigned, from National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ). NASDAQ will assign executing broker symbols to all dealers including bank dealers. NASDAQ Subscriber Services can be reached at 212-231-5180, option 3. When calling NASDAQ Subscriber Services for an executing broker symbol, dealers should state that they need the symbol for use in reporting transactions in municipal securities to the MSRB. If dealers experience difficulties in obtaining executing broker symbols, then they can send an e-mail to subscriber@NASDAQ.com.
NOTE: This notice was revised to reflect updated information.
Review and Approval of Customer Accounts
Review and approval of customer accounts. This is in response to your letter dated July 24, 1996, requesting an interpretation of rule G-27(c)(iii) on written supervisory procedures.
Rule G-27(c)(iii) requires that each municipal securities dealer adopt, maintain and enforce written supervisory procedures ensuring the "regular and frequent" review and approval by a designated principal of customer accounts introduced or carried by the dealer in which transactions in municipal securities are effected. The rule further states that such review shall be designed to ensure that such transactions are in accordance with all applicable rules and to detect and prevent irregularities and abuses.
Because circumstances vary from dealer to dealer, the Board has not specified a time period to define "regular and frequent" for purposes of rule G-27(c)(iii). As you can see, however, the purpose of this provision is to detect and prevent irregularities and abuses that may occur in customer accounts. The Board expects dealers to establish procedures that effectively obtain this objective and that are capable of compliance. While the Board has never specifically addressed "risk-focussed" methods for determining periodic account review, the Board has stated that, in determining when an account must be reviewed, a dealer might look to the volume and frequency of trading and the nature of the securities traded. The Board noted that account review guidelines based on these factors would be appropriate if they are articulated clearly in a dealer's written supervisory procedures.[1] MSRB interpretation of August 7, 1996.
[1] Supervision Requirements, MSRB Reports, Vol. 10, No. 2 (May 1990) at 6.
Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures-Time of Trade Reporting
1. Q: When is the inter-dealer time of trade reporting requirement effective?
A: The amendment to the rule G-14 transaction reporting procedures requiring the submission of time of trade execution for inter-dealer transactions became effective on July 1, 1996.
2. Q: What is the purpose of submitting the time of trade to the Board?
A: The Board's Transaction Reporting Program has two functions - public dissemination of price and volume information about frequently traded securities and the maintenance of a surveillance database to assist regulators in inspection for compliance with, and enforcement of, Board rules and securities laws. The surveillance database includes, among other things, the price and volume of each reported transaction, the trade date, the identification of the security traded, and the parties to the trade. The addition of the time of trade execution will enable the enforcement agencies to construct audit trails of inter-dealer transactions. When customer transactions are added to the system in 1998, these transaction records also will include time of trade. Time of trade will not be made public.
3. Q: How is time of trade reported?
A: Under rule G-14, inter-dealer transaction information is reported to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board using the same system used for automated comparison of inter-dealer transactions, operated by National Securities Clearing Corporation. Rule G-14 requires that the transaction information be submitted in the format specified by NSCC, and within such timeframe as required by NSCC to produce a compared trade for the transaction in the initial comparison cycle on the night of trade date. A broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may employ an agent that is a member of NSCC or a registered clearing agency for the purpose of submitting transaction information. For example, the clearing broker generally reports transactions to the MSRB through NSCC when there is an introducing/clearing broker arrangement.
Under the new amendment to rule G-14, the transaction information submitted in accordance with the rule G-14 procedures must include the time of trade execution. NSCC has provided a space designated for this purpose in the standard format used for submitting trade data into the automated comparison system.
4. Q: Which dealer in an inter-dealer transaction reports the time of trade?
A: Under NSCC's automated comparison procedures, both sides of a transaction generally are required to submit transaction information. Therefore, time of trade will be reported by each side of the transaction in most cases. For "syndicate take-down" transactions, which are reported by only the seller, the time of trade is reported only by the seller.
5. Q: If the time of trade that I submit does not agree with the time of trade that the contra party submits, will this cause the trade not to compare?
A: No. The time of trade is not a match item in the automated comparison system.
6. Q: Why do both sides to the transaction have to submit the time of trade?
A: In some cases, even though both sides of a transaction are supposed to submit transaction information, the Board receives transaction information from only one party to a transaction. This may occur, for example, when a dealer "stamps an advisory" to create a compared trade. It therefore is necessary for each side of a transaction to report the time of trade to ensure that the surveillance data base has at least one report of the time of trade.
7. Q: Does the time of trade reporting requirement apply only to secondary market transactions?
A: No. The time of trade is required for all inter-dealer transactions including those in the primary market.
8. Q: How does a dealer determine the time of trade for transactions?
A: In general, this is the same time as the "time of execution," as currently required for recordkeeping purposes under rule G-8(a)(vi) and (vii).
9. Q: What is the time of trade for syndicate allocations on new issues?
A: First it should be noted that the "initial trade date" for an issue of municipal securities cannot precede the date of award (for competitive issues) or the date that the bond purchase agreement is signed (for negotiated issues). See rule G-34(a)(ii)(C)(2) and MSRB Interpretations of April 30, 1982, MSRB Manual and October 7, 1982, MSRB Manual. Similarly, the time of trade may not precede the time of award (for competitive issues) or the time that the bond purchase agreement is signed (for negotiated issues). In the typical case involving a competitive issue in which allocations are made after the date of award, the time of trade execution is the time that the allocation is made. If allocations have been "preassigned," prior to a competitive award, or prior to the signing of a bond purchase agreement, the time of award or signing of the bond purchase agreement should be entered as the "time of trade."