Comments Requested on Additional Requirements for Pending Amendments on Disclosure of Consultants’ Contributions

* * *

        The Board is requesting comments regarding draft amendments to the reasonable efforts provision contained in proposed amendments to rule G-38, on consultants, pending at the SEC. Comments should be submitted to the Board no later than May 28, 1999, and may be directed to Ronald W. Smith, Senior Legal Associate. Written comments will be available for public inspection.

* * *

        On June 16, 1998, the Board filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") proposed amendments to rules G-38 and G-8, and revisions to the attachment page to Form G-37/G-38, to require dealers to obtain from their consultants¹ information on the consultants’ political contributions to official(s) of an issuer and payments to state and local political parties (hereafter collectively referred to as "contributions") and to require dealers to report such information to the Board on Form G-37/G-38.²

"REASONABLE EFFORTS" PROVISION

        The proposed amendments contain a "reasonable efforts" provision. The Board believes it is reasonable to allow dealers to rely in good faith on information received from their consultants regarding contributions and that it would be almost impossible and unduly burdensome for dealers to investigate for contributions that were not reported by their consultants. The reasonable efforts provision provides that a dealer will not be found to have violated rule G-38 if the dealer fails to receive from its consultants all required contribution information and thus fails to report such information to the Board if the dealer can demonstrate that it used reasonable efforts in attempting to obtain the necessary information. The proposed amendments state that reasonable efforts include having a dealer: (1) state in the Consultant Agreement that Board rules require disclosure of consultant contributions, and (2) send quarterly reminders to consultants of the deadline for their submissions to the dealer of contribution information. The Board stated in its filing of the amendments that, while the Board does not believe dealers have a duty to investigate whether the contribution information provided is accurate or complete, the Board would expect a dealer to vigorously enforce its contract with a consultant if the dealer becomes aware that the consultant is not providing it with materially complete or accurate information concerning contributions on a timely basis.

DRAFT AMENDMENTS

        The SEC staff has recommended that the reasonable efforts provision contain two additional requirements: (1) the dealer must disclose in its quarterly filings any consultant that does not provide a report of the information required by the rule, and (2) the dealer must terminate the contract should the consultant fail to provide such report by the next calendar quarter after it was due, and the dealer must not make any further payments pursuant to the Consultant Agreement. The SEC staff has stated that these additional requirements to the reasonable efforts provision should help ensure that all required information on contributions is obtained from consultants.

Disclosure of Any Consultant that Does Not Provide the Required Report

        As noted above, the SEC staff has recommended that the reasonable efforts provision require that a dealer disclose in its quarterly filings any consultant that does not provide a report of the information required by the rule. The pending proposed amendments currently require dealers to receive from their consultants reports on any reportable contributions but the amendments do not contain a requirement for dealers to receive reports if no such contributions were made. In order to establish a complete record of the information being reported by consultants, the draft amendments would revise the pending proposed amendments to require all dealers to receive reports every quarter from their consultants listing all reportable contributions or stating that the consultants made no reportable contributions, as appropriate. The dealer would then indicate the contributions reported or that the consultant had no contributions to report, as appropriate, on its Form G-37/G-38 for the applicable quarter. The Board believes it would be helpful for the general requirements in the rule language (and not the reasonable efforts provision) also to require dealers to disclose if they did not receive a report from a consultant during a particular quarter. Thus, if a consultant does not submit a report to the dealer for a particular quarter, the dealer must report that fact on its Form G-37/G-38.

Termination of Contract and No Further Payments

        The SEC staff’s second suggested requirement for the reasonable efforts provision is that a dealer must terminate the contract should a consultant fail to provide the required information by the next calendar quarter after it was due, and the dealer must not make any further payments to the consultant pursuant to the Consultant Agreement.

        The draft amendments would revise the pending proposed amendments to require dealers that wish to rely on a reasonable efforts defense to include language in their Consultant Agreements to the effect that the Consultant Agreement will be terminated if the consultant fails to provide the dealer a report of the required information within the required time frame and that no further payments will be made to the consultant from the date of termination of the Consultant Agreement if the Consultant Agreement is terminated because the consultant did not provide the required information. When a Consultant Agreement is terminated by the dealer because of a consultant’s failure to provide reports about its reportable contributions, the draft amendments would require a dealer that wishes to rely on a reasonable efforts defense to note on its Form G-37/G-38 that the Consultant Agreement has been terminated for this reason and the date of termination.

        If, for any calendar quarter, a consultant fails to provide the dealer with a report of its contributions or a report noting that the consultant made no reportable contributions and such failure continues up to the date by which the dealer is required to send Form G-37/G-38 to the Board with respect to the next succeeding calendar quarter, the dealer must terminate the Consultant Agreement by the date the form for such second quarter must be sent to the Board (i.e., January 31, April 30, July 31 or October 31) in order to rely on the reasonable efforts provision.³ Dealers that wish to rely on a reasonable efforts defense would not be permitted to make any further payments pursuant to the Consultant Agreement from the date of termination, even if money is owed to the consultant for services already rendered.

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS

        The Board is requesting comments from interested parties about the draft amendments, including the requirements to require consultants to report to dealers that no reportable contributions were made, if applicable, and to require dealers to disclose to the Board when no reports have been received from their consultants.⁴ While dealers do not have to rely on the reasonable efforts provision, most dealers that have contacted the Board regarding the proposed amendments have indicated that they would try to do so. As to the additional requirements to the reasonable efforts provision, the Board asks for comments particularly on the contractual provision that would require termination if a consultant fails to provide the required report after two quarters. In addition, the Board asks for comments on the requirement to cease paying the consultant pursuant to the Consultant Agreement as of the termination date.

April 19, 1999

Text of Amendments⁵

Rule G-38. Consultants

(a) Definitions.

(i)-(v) No change.

(vi) The term Areportable political contribution@ means:

        (A) if the consultant has had direct or indirect communication with an issuer on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to obtain or retain municipal securities business for such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, a political contribution to an official(s) of such issuer made by any contributor referred to in paragraph (b)(i) during the period beginning six months prior to such communication and ending six months after such communication;

        (B) the term does not include those political contributions to official(s) of an issuer made by any individual referred to in subparagraphs (b)(i)(A) or (B) of this rule who is entitled to vote for such official if the contributions made by such individual, in total, are not in excess of $250 to any official of such issuer, per election.

(vii) The term Areportable political party payment@ means:

        (A) if a political party of a state or political subdivision operates within the geographic area of an issuer with which the consultant has had direct or indirect communication to obtain or retain municipal securities business on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, a payment to such party made by any contributor referred to in paragraph (b)(i) during the period beginning six months prior to such communication and ending six months after such communication;

        (B) the term does not include those payments to political parties of a state or political subdivision made by any individual referred to in subparagraphs (b)(i)(A) or (B) of this rule who is entitled to vote in such state or political subdivision if the payments made by such individual, in total, are not in excess of $250 per political party, per year.

(viii) The term Aofficial of such issuer@ or Aofficial of an issuer@ shall have the same meaning as in rule G-37(g)(vi).

(b) Written Agreement

        (i) Each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer that uses a consultant shall evidence the consulting arrangement by a writing setting forth, at a minimum, the name, company, business address, role and compensation arrangement of each such consultant (AConsultant Agreement@). In addition, the Consultant Agreement shall include a statement that the consultant agrees to provide the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with a list by contributor category, in writing, of any reportable political contributions and any reportable political party payments during each calendar quarter made by:

        (A) the consultant;

        (B) any partner, director, officer or employee of the consultant who communicates with an issuer to obtain municipal securities business on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer; and

        (C) any political action committee controlled by the consultant or any partner, director, officer or employee of the consultant who communicates with an issuer to obtain municipal securities business on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer.

       (ii) The Consultant Agreement shall require that, if applicable, the consultant shall provide to the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer a report that no reportable political contributions or reportable political party payments were made during a calendar quarter.

        (iii) The Consultant Agreement shall require that the consultant provide the reportable political contributions and political party payments for each calendar quarter, or report that no reportable political contributions or political party payments were made for a particular calendar quarter, to the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in sufficient time for the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to meet its reporting obligations under paragraph (e) of this rule.

        (iv) Such The Consultant Agreement must be entered into before the consultant engages in any direct or indirect communication with an issuer on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer.

(c) Information Concerning Political Contributions to Official(s) of an Issuer and Payments to State and Local Political Parties made by Consultants.

        (i) A broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is required to obtain information on its consultant’s reportable political contributions and reportable political party payments beginning with a consultant=s first direct or indirect communication with an issuer on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to obtain or retain municipal securities business for such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer. The broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall obtain from the consultant the information concerning each reportable political contribution required to be recorded pursuant to rule G-8(a)(xviii)(F) and each reportable political party payment required to be recorded pursuant to rule G-8(a)(xviii)(G) or, if applicable, a report indicating that the consultant made no reportable political contributions and no reportable political party payments required to be recorded pursuant to rule G-8(a)(xviii)(H).

        (ii) The requirement to obtain the information referred to in paragraph (c)(i) of this rule shall end upon the termination of the Consultant Agreement.

        (iii) A broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer will not violate this section if it fails to receive from its consultant all required information on reportable political contributions and reportable political party payments and thus fails to report such information to the Board if the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer can demonstrate that it used reasonable efforts in attempting to obtain the necessary information. Reasonable efforts shall include:

        (A) a statement in the Consultant Agreement that Board rules require disclosure of consultant contributions to issuer officials and payments to state and local political parties; and

        (B) the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer sending quarterly reminders to its consultants of the deadline for their submissions to the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer of the information concerning their reportable political contributions and reportable political party payments;

        (C) the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer including in the Consultant Agreement provisions to the effect that:

        (1) the Consultant Agreement will be terminated by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer if, for any calendar quarter, the consultant fails to provide the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with information about its reportable political contributions or reportable political party payments, or a report noting that the consultant made no reportable political contributions or no reportable political party payments, and such failure continues up to the date to be determined by the dealer, but no later than the date by which the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is required to send Form G-37/G-38 to the Board with respect to the next succeeding calendar quarter, such termination to be effective upon the date the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer must send its Form G-37/G-38 to the Board (i.e., January 31, April 30, July 31 or October 31); and

        (2) no further payments shall be made to the consultant by or on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer as of the date of such termination; and

        (D) the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer enforcing the Consultant Agreement provisions described in paragraph (c)(iii)(C) of this rule in a full and timely manner and indicating the reason for and date of the termination on its Form G-37/G-38 for the applicable quarter.

(d) Disclosure to Issuers. Each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall submit in writing to each issuer with which the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is engaging or is seeking to engage in municipal securities business, information on consulting arrangements relating to such issuer, which information shall include the name, company, business address, role and compensation arrangement of any consultant used, directly or indirectly, by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to attempt to obtain or retain municipal securities business with each such issuer. Such information shall be submitted to the issuer either:

        (i) – (ii) No change.

(d) (e) Disclosure to Board. Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall send to the Board by certified or registered mail, or some other equally prompt means that provides a record of sending, and the Board shall make public, reports of all consultants used by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer during each calendar quarter. Two copies of the reports must be sent to the Board on Form G-37/G-38 by the last day of the month following the end of each calendar quarter (these dates correspond to January 31, April 30, July 31, and October 31). Such reports shall include, for each consultant, in the prescribed format, the consultant=s name, company, business address, role, and compensation arrangement, any municipal securities business obtained or retained by the consultant with each such business listed separately, and, if applicable, dollar amounts paid to the consultant connected with particular municipal securities business. In addition, s Such reports shall indicate the total dollar amount of payments made to each consultant during the report period and, if any such payments are related to the consultant=s efforts on behalf of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer which resulted in particular municipal securities business, then that business and the related dollar amount of the payment must be separately identified. In addition, such reports shall include the following information to the extent required to be obtained during such calendar quarter pursuant to paragraph (c)(i) of this rule:

        (i)(A) the name and title (including any city/county/state or political subdivision) of each official of an issuer and political party receiving reportable political contributions or reportable political party payments, listed by state; and

        (B) contribution or payment amounts made and the contributor category of the persons and entities described in paragraphs (b)(i) of this rule; or

        (ii) if applicable, a statement that the consultant reported that no reportable political contributions or reportable political party payments were made; or

        (iii) if applicable, a statement that the consultant failed to provide any report of information to the dealer concerning reportable political contributions or reportable political party payments.

Once a contribution or payment has been disclosed on a report, the dealer should not continue to disclose that particular contribution or payment on subsequent reports.

 

Rule G-8. Books and Records to be Made by Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) Description of Books and Records Required to be Made. Except as otherwise specifically indicated in this rule, every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall make and keep current the following books and records, to the extent applicable to the business of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (i) - (xvii) No change.

        (xviii) Records Concerning Consultants Pursuant to Rule G-38. Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall maintain:

        (i) (A) a listing of the name, company, business address, role and compensation arrangement of each consultant;

        (ii) (B) a copy of each Consultant Agreement referred to in rule G-38(b);

        (iii) (C) a listing of the compensation paid in connection with each such

Consultant Agreement;

        (iv) (D) where applicable, a listing of the municipal securities business obtained or retained through the activities of each consultant;

        (v) (E) a listing of issuers and a record of disclosures made to such issuers, pursuant to rule G-38(c) (d), concerning each consultant used by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to obtain or retain municipal securities business with each such issuer; and

        (vi) (F) records of each reportable political contribution (as defined in rule G-38(a)(vi)), which records shall include:

(1) the names, city/county and state of residence of contributors;

(2) the names and titles (including any city/county/state or other political subdivision) of the recipients of such contributions; and

(3) the amounts and dates of such contributions;

        (G) records of each reportable political party payment (as defined in rule G-38(a)(vii)), which records shall include:

(1) the names, city/county and state of residence of contributors;

(2) the names and titles (including any city/county/state or other political subdivision) of the recipients of such payments; and

(3) the amounts and dates of such payments;

        (H) records indicating, if applicable, that a consultant made no reportable political contributions (as defined in rule G-38(a)(vi)) or no reportable political party payments (as defined in rule G-38(a)(vii));

        (I) a statement, if applicable, that a consultant failed to provide any report of information to the dealer concerning reportable political contributions or reportable political party payments; and

        (J) the date of termination of any consultant arrangement.

(xix) No change.

(b) - (f) No change.

Rule G-37. Political Contributions and Prohibitions on Municipal Securities Business

(a) – (d) No change.

(e)(i)(A) – (C) No change.

        (D) any information required to be disclosed pursuant to section (d) (e) of rule G-38; and

        (E) No change.

(ii) – (iii) No change.

(f) – (i) No change.

---

ENDNOTES

1. Rule G-38 defines a consultant as "any person used by a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to obtain or retain municipal securities business through direct or indirect communication by such person with an issuer on behalf of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer where the communication is undertaken by such person in exchange for, or with the understanding of receiving, payment from the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or any other person." Specifically excluded from the definition of "consultant" in rule G-38 are municipal finance professionals of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and "any person whose sole basis of compensation from the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is the actual provision of legal, accounting or engineering advice, services or assistance in connection with the municipal securities business that the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is seeking to obtain or retain." The definition does not exclude any dealer used by another dealer (other than a member of the syndicate) that assists in obtaining or retaining municipal securities business. See Question and Answer to rule G-38 dated March 4, 1999, MSRB Manual (CCH), � 3686.

2. Rule G-38(b) requires each dealer that uses a consultant to evidence the consulting arrangement by a writing setting forth, at a minimum, the name, company, role and compensation arrangement of each such consultant ("Consultant Agreement"). The Consultant Agreement must be entered into before the consultant engages in any direct or indirect communication with an issuer on behalf of the dealer. The proposed amendments require a dealer to include within its Consultant Agreement a statement that the consultant agrees to provide the dealer each quarter with a listing of reportable political contributions to official(s) of an issuer and report payments to political parties of states and political subdivisions during such quarter. The Consultant Agreement must require the consultant to provide the required information to the dealer in sufficient time for the dealer to meet its reporting obligations under rule G-38. For a more complete description of the proposed amendments, see "Requirements for Dealers to Report Their Consultants’ Political Contributions and Payments to Political Parties: Rules G-38 and G-8," MSRB Reports, Vol. 18, No. 2 (August 1998) at 3-10. This notice is also available on the Board’s Web site at www.msrb.org.

3. Rule G-37(e)(i) provides that each dealer must send to the Board two copies of Form G-37/G-38 by the last day of the month following the end of each calendar quarter (these dates correspond to January 31, April 30, July 31 and October 31).

4. The draft amendments also include a technical amendment to rule G-37(e)(i)(D) to conform to the draft amendments to rule G-38.

5. Underlining indicates proposed amendments pending at the SEC; strikethrough indicates deletions; and bold with underlining indicates draft amendments.

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

Press Release for Health Care Financing Steering Committee

On January 21, 1999, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board sponsored a meeting in Chicago for issuers and analysts to discuss improving disclosure in connection with health care financings. The meeting was part of a series of discussions hosted by the Board and designed to facilitate disclosure improvements in the land-based, health care and housing financing areas. MSRB Chairman Scott C. Sollers hosted the meeting. Attending the meeting were, MSRB Vice-Chairman Dean Pope, Board member Lynn Hampton, Kit Taylor and Carolyn Walsh from the MSRB staff and representatives from the National Federation of Municipal Analysts, the National Council of Health Facilities Financing Authorities, Healthcare Financial Management Association, American Hospital Association and Van Kampen Funds. This group will be known as the Health Care Financing Steering Committee.

MSRB Chairman Scott C. Sollers stated, "We are pleased to see that in the health care financing sector issuer and investor groups already are making progress in the area of improving disclosure practices. The Steering Committee consensus was that the disclosure guidelines developed by the Healthcare Financial Management Association are a significant starting point. Representatives from the National Federation of Municipal Analysts intend to work with the Healthcare Financial Management Association, the American Hospital Association, and the National Council of Health Facilities Financing Authorities, to build upon these guidelines to develop voluntary national standards for disclosure and best practices. These groups are willing to work together to develop a consensus on the appropriate levels and types of disclosures in both the primary and secondary market."

The Steering Committee intends to monitor the developments and discuss progress in late spring. The MSRB will continue to assist the market participants in the development of these standards primarily through the hosting of discussion forums and/or education efforts. The MSRB also will work with industry participants toward the goal of achieving market-place adherence to the standards once they are developed.

January 25, 1999

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

BOARD WILL HOST FORUMS ON LAND-SECURED DISCLOSURE

        The Board will be hosting three forums on land–secured disclosure in September. The decision to host a series of forums focused on land-secured financing transaction disclosure is an outgrowth of the MSRB Forum on Disclosure held last November in Washington, D.C. During that forum, many participants urged the Board to promote similar forums focused on specific market sectors.

        The Board has been working with numerous land-secured market participants to put together these forums. The forums, which will be held in Washington, D.C., Houston, Texas, and Costa Mesa, California, will provide an opportunity for all participants in land-secured financing transactions to discuss issues of concern and possible mechanisms to improve land-secured disclosure.

        The forums will consist of sections discussing: (1) the recently released NFMA Draft Best Practices for Land-Secured Disclosure; (2) the role of developers in providing disclosure; (3) how to best represent value in land-secured transactions; and (4) issues involving dissemination of disclosure information. Paul Maco, Director of the SEC’s Office of Municipal Securities, will be the luncheon speaker at the forums.

        The specific dates and locations for the forums are:

Tuesday, September 14, 1999 � Washington, D.C. forum to be held at the Sheraton Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia.

Wednesday, September 15, 1999 � Houston, Texas forum to be held at the Sheraton North Houston, George Bush Intercontinental Airport, 15700 John F. Kennedy Blvd., Houston, Texas.

Thursday, September 16, 1999 � Costa Mesa, California forum to be held at the Westin South Coast Plaza, 686 Anton Blvd., Costa Mesa, California.

        The Board is charging a $100 registration fee for attendance. Participants must complete a registration form and submit the form along with the registration fee in advance. A registration form may be obtained by calling the Board’s office at (202) 223-9347 or by downloading from below. Also, a tentative schedule for the forums may be downloaded from below.

July 15, 1999

Registration Form      Tentative Schedule

 

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

Release Regarding the Land-Secured Financing Steering Committee

On January 26, 1999 the Land-Secured Financing Steering Committee met by conference call and had an extensive discussion about the ongoing process of developing national disclosure guidelines for land-secured financing. The Steering Committee agreed that an appropriate first step is to have the NFMA produce a working draft statement of disclosure guidelines. The working draft, which the NFMA hopes to create by the end of May, can then be circulated and used as a starting point for in-depth disclosure discussions that will be open to all interested industry participants. The Steering Committee will reconvene in March to discuss an appropriate timetable for the MSRB to host forums geared to solicit nationwide industry comment on the working draft. The forums will seek input on the substance of the draft guidelines from industry participants involved in the many aspects of land-secured financing.

January 29, 1999

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

MUNICIPAL FUND SECURITIES - REVISED DRAFT RULE CHANGES

The Board is requesting further comments on revised draft rule changes relating to municipal fund securities. Comments are due by November 1, 1999.

        On March 17, 1999, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "Board") published a notice (the "March Notice") requesting comments on draft rule changes relating to transactions effected by or through brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers ("dealers") in municipal fund securities (as defined below).⁽¹⁾ The Board received comments from eleven commentators. After reviewing these comments, the Board has determined to republish the draft rule changes, with certain modifications and additions (including a revision to exempt municipal fund securities from underwriting assessments), for further comment from industry participants.

        The Board believes that many of the comments reflect a misunderstanding of the nature of the Board's rulemaking proposals and therefore the Board is taking this opportunity to clarify the scope and intent of these proposals. Specifically, the Board wishes to emphasize that the draft rule changes would not extend the reach of Board rules. Rather, they seek to make Board rules that are already applicable to municipal fund securities more accommodating to the unique features of such securities. Dealers should understand that Board rules apply to their transactions in any security that is a municipal security, regardless of whether the dealer is aware of the security's status. Although the Board does not have authority to direct enforcement of its rules, it is statutorily charged with determining the best means of protecting investors and the public interest in regard to dealer transactions in municipal securities. As such, the Board believes that, under the unique circumstances relating to municipal fund securities, enforcement of its rules with regard to transactions in such securities that occurred prior to the industry having been put on notice of their applicability would serve no substantial investor protection purpose, absent extraordinary circumstances or a showing of investor harm resulting from a material departure from standards of fairness generally applicable under the federal securities laws.

SCOPE AND INTENT OF BOARD RULEMAKING WITH RESPECT TO MUNICIPAL FUND SECURITIES

        Dealers that effect transactions in municipal securities are subject to the Board's jurisdiction pursuant to Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In particular, Section 15B(c)(1) prohibits dealers from effecting transactions in, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of, a municipal security in contravention of any Board rule. Thus, since enactment of Section 15B and the creation of the Board in the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 (the "Securities Acts Amendments"), a transaction effected by a dealer in a municipal security must be effected in conformity with Board rules.

        In the March Notice, the Board reviewed two types of state or local governmental programs involving investment interests in which dealers may effect transactions: pooled investment funds under trusts established by state or local governmental entities ("local government pools")⁽²⁾ and higher education savings plan trusts established by states ("higher education trusts").⁽³⁾ These programs had been brought to the Board's attention by staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). In response to a Board inquiry as to the SEC's position on whether interests in such programs were municipal securities, SEC staff stated that "at least some interests in local government pools and higher education trusts may be, depending on the facts and circumstances, 'municipal securities' for purposes of the Exchange Act."⁽⁴⁾

        Board rules do not apply to any interest in a local government pool or higher education trust that is not a municipal security. In addition, Board rules apply only to activities of dealers that effect municipal securities transactions. Thus, Board rules do not apply to an issuer of, or a non-dealer entity providing advice to issuers in regard to, municipal securities, including municipal fund securities. However, to the extent that interests in a local government pool or a higher education trust are municipal securities and dealers are effecting transactions in them, Board rules automatically govern such dealer transactions, without the necessity of further Board rulemaking^.(5) On several previous occasions, the Board has alerted the industry to the applicability of Board rules to (and has proposed rule changes to accommodate) transactions in new forms of municipal securities or pre-existing forms of securities that many in the industry had not previously recognized as municipal securities.⁽⁶⁾

        A municipal fund security is defined as a municipal security issued by an issuer that, but for Section 2(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"),⁽⁷⁾ would constitute an investment company under that Act. Thus, Board rules on municipal fund securities would apply to interests in a state or local governmental trust, such as local government pools and higher education trusts,⁽⁸⁾ only if the following three conditions are met:

1. A dealer is engaging in transactions in such interests;
2. Such interests, in fact, constitute municipal securities; and
3. Such interests are issued by an issuer that, but for the exemption under Section 2(b) of the Investment Company Act, would be considered an investment company within the meaning of that Act.

        The Board understands that municipal fund securities may not have features typically associated with more traditional municipal securities. Instead, their features are similar to those of investment company securities.⁽⁹⁾ In the March Notice, the Board stated that, although its rules generally have been drafted to accommodate the characteristics of debt securities, it believes that most current rules can appropriately be applied to municipal fund securities. Nonetheless, the Board felt that certain rules should be amended to recognize the unique characteristics of municipal fund securities. The draft rule changes did not seek to extend the reach of Board rules, since the rules already apply to municipal fund securities, but sought to tailor certain Board rules to the nature of municipal fund securities.

DISCUSSION OF COMMENTS AND DRAFT RULE CHANGES

Authority of Board to Adopt Draft Rule Changes

        Comments Received. Some commentators state that the Board has no authority to regulate municipal fund securities, particularly local government pool interests.⁽¹⁰⁾ They state that such interests are not municipal securities under the Exchange Act. They argue that the term "municipal securities" is limited to debt obligations of municipal issuers and that interests in local government pools represent equity interests in trust assets, not debt obligations.⁽¹¹⁾ Another commentator questions whether Congress intended that the Board regulate local government pools when it created the Board.

        Board Response. As previously stated, a security must first be a municipal security in order to be a municipal fund security. The draft rule changes would not, and existing Board rules do not, apply to local government pool or higher education trust interests that are not municipal securities. Thus, the Board does not overstep its authority by regulating dealer transactions in municipal fund securities since, by definition, regulation is limited to interests that are municipal securities.

        A firm wishing to determine if Board rules apply to services it provides to an issuer of local government pool or higher education trust interests may seek advice of counsel as to whether (1) such services constitute broker-dealer activities, or (2) such interests are municipal securities. It may seek comfort on counsel's opinion from SEC staff through the SEC's no-action procedure. If a non-dealer firm's activities do not constitute broker-dealer activities, the firm need not be a registered broker or dealer subject to Board rules, even if the interests are municipal securities.⁽¹²⁾ If the interests are not municipal securities, the dealer need not comply with Board rules; however, the dealer's activities may be subject to Exchange Act provisions and SEC and National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") rules, unless the interests otherwise qualify for an exemption (e.g., as exempted securities other than municipal securities) under the Exchange Act.

        Of course, the Board's rulemaking proposal is meaningful only if municipal fund securities, in fact, exist. As noted above, the Board sought comfort from SEC staff that local government pool and higher education trust interests are municipal securities. SEC staff replied that "at least some interests in local government pools and higher education trusts may be, depending on the facts and circumstances, 'municipal securities' for purposes of the Exchange Act."⁽¹³⁾ Although the Board is not empowered to determine whether a security is a municipal security within the meaning of Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act, the Board believes that, based on this SEC response as well as a close review of existing no-action letters and legislative history of the Securities Acts Amendments, the Exchange Act and the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), as discussed below, at least some interests in local government pools and higher education trusts are municipal securities.

        For example, in agreeing not to recommend enforcement action in several no-action letters, SEC staff relied on opinions of counsel that interests in state or local governmental trusts were municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽¹⁴⁾ In one instance, SEC staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action if a dealer, in offering and selling interests in a higher education trust, were to comply with Board rules as they have been proposed to be amended in the March Notice, in lieu of complying with such rules as currently in effect.⁽¹⁵⁾ In another no-action letter, SEC staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action if dealers (1) sold interests in a higher education trust through persons qualified to sell investment company products but who did not meet the Board's professional qualification requirements⁽¹⁶⁾ and (2) complied with Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) through a continuing disclosure undertaking from a dealer affiliate, rather than from the issuer. In reaching this position, SEC staff noted that the higher education trust interests were "atypical municipal securities."⁽¹⁷⁾

        In other instances, SEC staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action if state entities and their employees sold higher education trust interests without registering as brokers.⁽¹⁸⁾ The applicants opined in these cases that the interests were municipal securities under the Exchange Act, thereby exempting the issuers from registering as brokers by virtue of the exemption for issuers of municipal securities set forth in Section 3(d).⁽¹⁹⁾ SEC staff also agreed not to recommend enforcement action if interests in a state trust were not registered under the Exchange Act, in reliance on an opinion that the exemption under Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act for exempted securities was available.⁽²⁰⁾

        SEC staff also has taken the position that non-debt securities may be municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽²¹⁾ In one case, SEC staff was unable to conclude that receipts/certificates evidencing developers' payments to a city of fees for the issuance of building permits could not be considered municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽²²⁾ SEC staff also has advised the Board that warrants sold by a municipal corporation entitling the holders to purchase other municipal securities of that corporation are themselves municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽²³⁾ Finally, in those cases in which SEC staff concluded that an "obligation" within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code would also constitute an "obligation" for purposes of Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act, SEC staff did not conclude that the failure of a security to be an obligation for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code would mean that such security was not a municipal security for purposes of the Exchange Act.⁽²⁴⁾ In these cases, SEC staff was not presented with the issue of whether a non-debt security could be a municipal security. As noted above, on the last two occasions when SEC staff was confronted with this issue, it concluded that a non-debt security may be a municipal security for purposes of the Exchange Act.⁽²⁵⁾

        A review of legislative history also suggests that the commentators' position that the term "municipal securities" in the Exchange Act excludes non-debt securities is not justified. The Senate report on the Securities Acts Amendments notes that the legislation created a definition of municipal securities in new Section 3(a)(29) that, for all relevant purposes, used the same language as in the original version of the definition of exempted securities in Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act.⁽²⁶⁾ It also states that no substantive changes in meaning would be effected by creating Section 3(a)(29).⁽²⁷⁾ Thus, the import of the term "municipal securities" must be viewed through the eyes of the original drafters of the Exchange Act in 1934 rather than the drafters of the Securities Acts Amendments in 1975.

        The purpose of including municipal securities in the definition of exempted securities in the Exchange Act was to provide an exemption from most provisions of that Act. Although commentators suggest that Board regulation of dealer transactions in non-debt securities of municipal issuers is inconsistent with the intent of the drafters of the Securities Acts Amendments, the appropriate inquiry is whether the drafters of the original Exchange Act would have intended that only debt securities of municipal issuers be exempted from most provisions of the Exchange Act. That is, would the drafters of the original Exchange Act have intended that non-debt securities of state or local governmental entities - had such securities existed at the time - be subject to the entire range of regulation of the Exchange Act applicable to other equity securities, including in some instances a requirement for registration of such securities with the SEC? A review of Congressional debates, committee reports and hearing testimony relating to enactment of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act reveals that, in spite of differences in statutory language, both Acts were expected to exempt the same universe of municipal securities.

        For example, the 1933 House report on the Securities Act speaks of exempted state and local government securities almost exclusively in terms of "obligations" and "bonds," not "securities."⁽²⁸⁾ The report explains the exemption set forth in Section 3(a) of the Securities Act as follows:

        Paragraph (2) exempts United States, Territorial and State obligations, or obligations of any political subdivision of these governmental units. The term "political subdivision" carries with it the exemption of such securities as county, town, or municipal obligations, as well as school district, drainage district, and levee district, and other similar bonds. The line drawn by the expression "political subdivision" corresponds generally with the line drawn by the courts as to what obligations of States, their units and instrumentalities created by them, are exempted from Federal taxation. By such delineation, any constitutional difficulties that might arise with reference to the inclusion of State and municipal obligations are avoided.⁽²⁹⁾

        Furthermore, during Congressional debate and hearings held in 1933 on the Securities Act, members of Congress used the terms "securities," "obligations" and "bonds" interchangeably.⁽³⁰⁾ Thus, although the statutory language in the Securities Act uses only the term "securities" and not the term "obligations" when describing municipal securities, there is no suggestion that Congress had anything in mind when enacting the Securities Act other than the tax-exempt bonds and other debt obligations of state and local governments that are customarily associated with municipal securities. Nonetheless, the commentators all have agreed that local government pool and higher education trust interests are exempt from the Securities Act and none has suggested that this exemption is limited to tax-exempt debt obligations.

        The initial Exchange Act draft introduced in Congress the following year exempted federal government securities but not municipal securities. Members of Congress expressed concern regarding the appropriateness of federal regulation of state and local governmental matters,⁽³¹⁾ the burden that Exchange Act provisions would place on state and local issuers⁽³²⁾ and the relative detriment in the market to municipal securities if they were not exempted but federal government securities were exempted.⁽³³⁾ Some discussion focused on whether a distinction should be drawn between defaulted and non-defaulted municipal securities.⁽³⁴⁾ Ultimately, the language that was added to the Exchange Act to exempt municipal securities made no such distinction but instead was drafted in non-exclusive terms that paralleled the language used in the Exchange Act to describe federal government securities. This language also employed the same type of terminology that the drafters of the Securities Act had used in the legislative history to explain the statutory language on municipal securities in that Act.⁽³⁵⁾ Legislative history does not reflect any intent or understanding that the municipal securities contemplated in the Exchange Act were any different than those that were already exempted under the Securities Act.⁽³⁶⁾ It would be inconsistent with legislative intent to limit the exemption under the Exchange Act solely to debt securities of state and local governments without similarly limiting the reach of the exemption provided in the Securities Act.

        Finally, in using the same term - "municipal securities" - that sets out the exemption from most Exchange Act provisions to also delineate the Board's rulemaking authority under Section 15B of the Exchange Act, Congress elected in the Securities Acts Amendments to grant the Board jurisdiction over dealer transactions in the identical universe of securities as were otherwise exempted from the Exchange Act as municipal securities. Thus, even if Congress did not have interests in local government pools or higher education trusts in mind when enacting the Securities Acts Amendments, it did have a specific intent that the Board would have authority over dealer transactions in any security that would constitute an exempted security by virtue of being a municipal security. In creating the Board, the Senate report on the Securities Acts Amendments stated that it would not "be desirable to restrict the Board's authority by a specific enumeration of subject matters. The ingenuity of the financial community and the impossibility of anticipating all future circumstances are obvious reasons for allowing the Board a measure of flexibility in laying down the rules for the municipal securities industry."⁽³⁷⁾ The fact that certain types of instruments (such as non-debt securities of state or local governments) were essentially non-existent at the time of enactment of the Securities Acts Amendments did not, in the minds of the drafters, mean that regulations relating to newly created instruments would not be within the Board's power.⁽³⁸⁾

Appropriateness of Regulating Dealer Transactions in Municipal Fund Securities

        Comments Received. Commentators state that, even if the Board has authority to adopt the draft rule changes, the Board should refrain from doing so. They argue that no need has been demonstrated for regulation to protect investors or the public interest in connection with local government pool interests. They state that investors are local governments and not the typical public investor in municipal securities.⁽³⁹⁾ They also argue that offerings of interests in local government pools do not pose risks that are similar to those identified in the legislative history of the Securities Acts Amendments.⁽⁴⁰⁾ One commentator argues that safeguards already exist to provide investor protections comparable to those in the draft rule changes.⁽⁴¹⁾

        Some commentators state that Board rulemaking would adversely impact state and local governments. In particular, they believe that underwriting assessments would be passed on, directly or indirectly, to issuers and issuers would face additional administrative burdens as a result of the application of Board rules. They note that any increased costs to issuers likely would be passed on to investors in the form of lower returns on their investments.

        Commentators also state that interests in local government pools involve transactions between the state or local government-sponsored pools and participating local governmental entities of that same state. One commentator believes that Board rulemaking would be inconsistent with the Tenth Amendment and transactions in local government pool interests do not constitute interstate commerce. Furthermore, noting that the Exchange Act does not require registration of a broker or dealer whose business is exclusively intrastate, this commentator suggests that the Board "follow Congress's restraint in approaching intrastate transactions in securities." Finally, it states that regulation of transactions in these interests would "improperly intrude on state sovereignty" by indirectly regulating states by mandating actions by their agents.

        Board Response. As the Board has previously observed, the current rulemaking proposal would not subject dealer transactions in municipal fund securities to Board rules but instead would make certain Board rules, to which such transactions are already subject, better accommodate the nature of these securities. Making Board rules fit the characteristics of municipal fund securities is an appropriate Board undertaking. Also, Board rules do not govern the actions of issuers; instead, they impose standards on dealers effecting transactions in the securities of such issuers. In establishing the Board, Congress determined that dealer regulation was the appropriate manner of providing investor protection in the municipal securities market while maintaining the existing exemption for issuers.⁽⁴²⁾

        The definition of customer under rule D-9 includes issuers, except in connection with sales of an issuer's new issue municipal securities, and therefore Board rules contemplate that governmental entities acting as investors are entitled to the protections afforded by such rules to all customers.⁽⁴³⁾ The Board understands that local government pools exist in nearly every state and that, in many states, more than one pool may be available to a local government.⁽⁴⁴⁾ One market observer states that these pools "can differ in their level of risk taking, internal oversight, shareholder services, and external reporting."⁽⁴⁵⁾ Although a number of pools have been rated, the vast majority remain unrated. Most local government pools appear to be designed to maintain, as nearly as possible, a constant net asset value (similar to regulated money market mutual funds), but some operate as variable net asset value pools that do not seek to maintain a constant share value. Furthermore, a number of local government pools have experienced financial difficulties.⁽⁴⁶⁾ These factors suggest that investor protection issues may be raised in connection with the sale by dealers of interests in local government pools.⁽⁴⁷⁾ The Board believes that investor protection issues also may arise with respect to sales by dealers of interests in higher education trusts.⁽⁴⁸⁾ For example, the Board believes that dealers have suitability obligations if they recommend a transaction in a local government pool or higher education trust interest to a local government or an individual, respectively, if such interest constitutes a municipal security.⁽⁴⁹⁾

        Commentators describe local government pools as being operated "consistent with" the federal securities laws applicable to investment companies and managed and administered in a manner "similar" to money market mutual funds, "where practicable." These comments imply that many programs in fact deviate to some degree from their voluntary compliance with existing federal regulations that would be applicable to these programs if they were not operated by state or local governmental entities. However, the Board notes that its proposed rulemaking would not impose requirements on issuers and in fact has been drafted with the understanding that dealers may be effecting transactions in securities that are similar, but not identical, to investment company securities. In that respect, the Board believes that its proposed rulemaking is more suitable for dealers effecting transactions in municipal fund securities than existing SEC and NASD rules applicable to dealer transactions in investment company securities since some such rules impose obligations on dealers based on the assumption that issuers, as registered investment companies, must comply with federal investment company laws and regulations. Thus, a dealer might have difficulty in complying with the letter of existing regulations relating to securities of registered investment companies where the issuer of a local government pool or higher education trust interest has chosen not to voluntarily comply with the provisions that would be obligatory if it were a registered investment company. As is the case with all existing Board rules, the current rulemaking proposal recognizes that issuers, as largely unregulated entities, may act in widely divergent manners. Thus, obligations placed on dealers should be sufficiently flexible to permit dealers to act in a lawful manner in view of this wide divergence of circumstances while maintaining an adequate level of customer protection.

        The Board believes that state regulation, federal rules applicable to investment advisors and Governmental Accounting Standards Board statements, although providing important protections in the areas governed by such rules and standards, do not serve as a substitute for regulation tailored specifically toward dealer activities in municipal fund securities. Furthermore, the Board believes that voluntary adherence to the substance of existing rules applicable to investment company securities and/or other equity securities provides inadequate protection to investors since dealers are free to deviate from these rules in any manner and at any time they choose without any apparent legal consequence. The existence of these collateral safeguards do not justify the Board refraining from making its rules more rational with respect to such securities.

        Finally, with regard to the argument that interests in local government pools are strictly intrastate in nature and therefore are not the appropriate subject of federal regulation, Board rules currently do not apply to any entity that, by virtue of the fact that its business is exclusively intrastate, is not registered as a broker or dealer under Section 15 of the Exchange Act. Beyond this, the federal securities laws provide that, once an entity engages in some interstate activities that require it to register under the Exchange Act, the broker-dealer rules applicable to such entity apply to both its interstate and intrastate transactions. We believe that Congress has made clear its policy determination that intrastate transactions of registered broker-dealers should be subject to broker-dealer regulation.⁽⁵⁰⁾

Applicability of Existing Board Rules to Transactions in Municipal Fund Securities Effected Prior to Effectiveness of Draft Rule Changes

        Comments Received. Two commentators argue that, to the extent that the Board may have authority to regulate dealer transactions in these interests, existing Board rules relating to municipal securities do not currently apply to transactions in local government pool interests. They state that existing Board rules were never intended to apply to securities other than debt obligations, as evidenced by the Board's statement in the March Notice that its rules "generally have been drafted to accommodate the characteristics of debt obligations and not investment interests such as municipal fund securities." As a result, they believe that any interpretation by the Board to the effect that existing rules apply to municipal fund securities can only be effected through the rulemaking process.

        Board Response. As stated above, the Board believes that Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act automatically subjects any dealer transactions in municipal fund securities to Board rules. This is true regardless of whether dealers effecting such transactions are aware that municipal fund securities are, in fact, municipal securities. It is incumbent upon dealers to be aware of the nature of the securities in which they undertake transactions and it is not a defense against the applicability of Board rules that the dealer did not know that the securities were municipal securities. Thus, the Board's statement that any interest in a local government pool or a higher education trust that is a municipal security currently is subject to Board rules was a statement of fact rather than an interpretation.⁽⁵¹⁾

        The Board recognizes, however, that, prior to publication of the March Notice, it may not have been readily apparent to the vast majority of dealers, as well as to most regulatory agencies, that interests that constitute municipal fund securities were municipal securities. Although the Board does not have authority to direct enforcement of its rules, it is statutorily charged with determining the best means of protecting investors and the public interest in regard to dealer transactions in municipal securities. As such, the Board believes that, under the unique circumstances relating to municipal fund securities, enforcement of its rules with regard to transactions in such securities that occurred prior to the industry having been put on notice of their applicability would serve no substantial investor protection purpose, absent extraordinary circumstances or a showing of investor harm resulting from a material departure from standards of fairness generally applicable under the federal securities laws.

Structure of Draft Rule Changes

        Comments Received. Some commentators express concern that the Board's rulemaking proposal contemplates amendments to existing rules rather than creation of a separate body of regulations. One commentator states that the "attempt to fit a totally new product or way of doing business into existing regulation that was created to address fundamentally different products and a different market structure is fraught with danger." Commentators also state that transactions in municipal fund securities should be regulated in a manner as similar as possible to the existing regulatory scheme for investment company securities.

        Board Response. The Board reviewed its existing rules and compared them, where relevant, to rules that govern dealer transactions in securities of registered investment companies. In many respects, Board rules are functionally identical to such existing rules. In other cases, existing SEC or NASD rules provide a more appropriate method of regulating municipal fund securities and the Board sought to modify its rules in a manner that was consistent with such other rules. In yet other cases, the regulation of the structure and marketing of securities of registered investment companies has been effected by regulations applicable to issuers, an approach which the Board cannot, and does not seek to, duplicate. Finally, certain NASD and SEC rule provisions arise out of specific Congressional authorization in the Investment Company Act applicable to securities of registered investment companies but not applicable to unregistered municipal fund securities.

        Under the circumstances, the Board believes that its approach is appropriate. The Board sought industry comment on the draft rule changes and, in those circumstances where commentators noted specific shortcomings, the Board considered the merits of the comments and made revisions where appropriate. The Board was disappointed that several commentators chose to comment almost exclusively on jurisdictional issues and hopes that they will now address the details of, and any concerns raised by, the revised draft rule changes.

Specific Rule Provisions

        Rule A-13, on Underwriting Assessments. In the March Notice, the Board states that sales of municipal fund securities are made in a primary offering subject to the underwriting assessment in rule A-13.⁽⁵²⁾ The draft amendment to rule A-13 would have provided for the imposition of an underwriting assessment with respect to such sales of municipal fund securities.

        Most commentators express concern regarding the assessment of underwriting fees on sales of municipal fund securities. Some suggest that such sales should be exempted from the underwriting assessment. They state that the fee structure for dealers involved in the distribution of municipal fund securities is more like an administrative fee than an underwriting discount or commission since these dealers do not undertake underwriting risks. As a result, they state that fees generally are fixed and are low relative to traditional underwriting fees. Because of these small margins, a number of commentators state that underwriting assessments would be passed on to issuers and therefore would represent a financial burden on the issuers' programs.⁽⁵³⁾

        Some commentators state that, given the volume of investments and redemptions in many municipal fund securities programs,⁽⁵⁴⁾ the level of fees generated by the Board from underwriting assessments would be disproportionate to the resulting regulatory costs. One commentator states that, if assessments are imposed, they should be at a significantly lower level than the assessments charged in connection with more traditional municipal securities offerings.⁽⁵⁵⁾

        Based on the comments, the Board has revised the draft amendment to rule A-13 to exempt sales of municipal fund securities from the underwriting assessment. The continuous nature of offerings in municipal fund securities, the programmatic nature of most customer investments and the heightened potential that underwriting assessments could create significant financial burdens on issuers to their customers' detriment justify caution in imposing the underwriting assessment. The Board also wishes to make clear that it does not intend to seek payment of any previously accrued underwriting assessments that may technically be due and owing on prior sales of municipal fund securities.

        Draft Rule D-12, on Definition of "Municipal Fund Security". Draft rule D-12 defines municipal fund security as a municipal security that would be an investment company security under the Investment Company Act but for the fact that the issuer is a state or local governmental entity or instrumentality. For a security to constitute a municipal fund security, the security must first constitute a municipal security. The draft amendments would not apply to any local government pool or higher education trust interest that is not a municipal security. The Board has not revised the draft definition.⁽⁵⁶⁾

        Rule G-3, on Professional Qualifications. The draft amendment to rule G-3 would permit an associated person qualified as an investment company limited representative to effect transactions in municipal fund securities (but no other municipal securities).⁽⁵⁷⁾ A dealer must have municipal securities principals as required under rule G-3(b), even if the dealer's only municipal securities transactions are sales of municipal fund securities. The Board has not revised this draft amendment.⁽⁵⁸⁾

        Rule G-8, on Recordkeeping. The draft amendment to rule G-8 would recognize that municipal fund securities do not have par values, dollar prices, yields and accrued interest and that some investment company limited representatives would be permitted to effect transactions in municipal fund securities. The Board did not receive comments on its draft amendment to rule G-8. However, in conjunction with revisions to the draft amendment to rule G-15 described below, the Board is proposing an additional revision to rule G-8 to require that dealers retain copies of all periodic statements delivered to customers in lieu of individual confirmations.

        Rule G-14, on Transaction Reporting. The draft rule change would make a technical modification in rule G-14(b)(i) to make clear that certain types of municipal securities transactions may be excluded from transaction reporting as provided in the Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures. In the Procedures, the language change would expressly exempt any transaction in municipal fund securities from the customer transaction reporting system.⁽⁵⁹⁾ The Board did not receive comments on, and has not revised, these draft amendments.

        Rule G-15, on Customer Confirmations. The draft amendment to rule G-15 would effect changes relating to the concepts of par value, yield, dollar price, maturity date and interest, none of which would appropriately apply to a municipal fund security. Thus, on a confirmation of a municipal fund securities transaction, a dealer would use the purchase or sale price of the securities (as appropriate) rather than par value and would omit yield, dollar price, accrued interest, extended principal, maturity date and interest rate. Dealers selling municipal fund securities would be required to include the denomination or purchase price of each share or unit as well as the number of shares or units to be delivered. Confirmations of municipal fund securities transactions would require a disclosure to the effect that a deferred commission or other charge may be imposed upon redemption, if applicable.⁽⁶⁰⁾ The amendment also would make clear that dealers must confirm redemptions of municipal fund securities. Finally, the amendment would permit dealers to use quarterly statements, rather than transaction-by-transaction confirmations, if customers are purchasing such securities in an agreed amount on a periodic basis, in a manner similar to the periodic reporting provision under Exchange Act Rule 10b-10.

The Board received a number of technical comments on various provisions in rule G-15:⁽⁶¹⁾

        Periodic Statements - Rule G-15(a)(vi)(G) and (a)(viii) - Some commentators state that the draft amendments would require individual confirmations for each transaction in local government pool interests and suggest that dealers be permitted to use monthly statements.⁽⁶²⁾ Another commentator states that transactions in higher education trust interests that are not effected pursuant to a periodic plan should nonetheless qualify for periodic statements in lieu of individual transaction confirmations.⁽⁶³⁾

        The Board has decided to revise the draft amendment to rule G-15 to provide that information regarding transactions in municipal fund securities effected in connection with a program that does not provide for periodic purchases or redemptions of municipal fund securities may be disclosed to customers on a monthly statement in lieu of transaction confirmations.⁽⁶⁴⁾ With respect to natural persons who participate in a non-periodic program, this monthly reporting would require the written consent of such individual or of the issuer. If the issuer directs that monthly statements be used in lieu of transaction confirmations, the revised draft amendment to rule G-15(a)(viii) would permit dealers effecting transactions in such municipal fund securities to use monthly statements without obtaining the consent of any customers. In addition, the draft amendment has been revised to eliminate the requirement that customers participating in a group plan consent to the use of periodic statements in lieu of transaction confirmations.⁽⁶⁵⁾

        Rule G-15(a)(i)(A)(7) - In order to avoid the potential for ambiguity, this subparagraph has been revised to eliminate reference to denomination and to refer solely to the share purchase price.⁽⁶⁶⁾

        Rule G-15(a)(i)(C) and (a)(i)(B)(1) - A commentator notes that the Board did not provide guidance regarding the securities descriptive information required to be included under paragraph (a)(i)(C) and states that such paragraph should not be applicable to municipal fund securities. In the alternative, it suggests that confirmations should not be required to state that municipal fund securities are unrated.⁽⁶⁷⁾ The Board has revised the draft amendment to (i) provide that a confirmation of a municipal fund security transaction need not show the information required under paragraph (a)(i)(C) other than whether the security is puttable and (ii) include a requirement in subparagraph (a)(i)(B)(1) that the confirmation include the name used by the issuer to identify the security and, to the extent necessary to differentiate the security from other municipal fund securities of the issuer, any separate program series, portfolio or fund designation. A statement to the effect that the security is unrated would not be required.

        Rule G-21, on Advertising. The Board did not propose amending rule G-21 in the March Notice. One commentator states that this rule should be revised to eliminate references to price and yield for purposes of municipal fund securities. Section (d)(i) provides that an advertisement for new issue municipal securities may show the initial reoffering price or yield, even if they have changed, so long as the date of sale is shown. In addition, it provides that if the price or yield shown in the advertisement is other than the initial price or yield, the price or yield shown must have been accurate at the time the advertisement was submitted for publication. The Board believes that these provisions do not unnecessarily restrict the manner in which municipal fund securities may be advertised nor do they mandate that an advertisement for a municipal fund security specify a price or yield.⁽⁶⁸⁾ Therefore, no change has been proposed to rule G-21.

        Rule G-26, on Customer Account Transfers. The draft amendment to rule G-26 amends the definition of "nontransferable asset" to reflect the fact that the issuer of municipal fund securities may limit which dealers may carry accounts for customers in such securities. The Board did not receive comments on, and has not revised, this draft amendment.

        Rule G-32, on New Issue Disclosures. No amendments to rule G-32 were proposed in the March Notice. However, the Board stated that municipal fund securities sold in a primary offering would constitute new issue municipal securities for purposes of rule G-32 so long as the securities are in the underwriting period. Since the Board understands that issuers of municipal fund securities are continuously issuing and delivering the securities as customers make purchases, the Board believes that municipal fund securities would remain in their underwriting period so long as such issuance and delivery continues.⁽⁶⁹⁾ Thus, a dealer effecting a transaction in a municipal fund security would be required to deliver to the customer the official statement, if one exists, by settlement of the transaction. However, in the case of a customer purchasing such securities who is a repeat purchaser, no new delivery of the official statement would be required so long as the customer has previously received it in connection with a prior purchase and the official statement has not been changed from the one previously delivered to that customer.⁽⁷⁰⁾

        One commentator expresses concern regarding the timing requirement of rule G-32 in the limited circumstances where a revision has just been made to the official statement and a customer that participates in a periodic plan makes an automatic purchase of additional shares of municipal fund securities. In spite of the best efforts of the dealer and the issuer, it may be impossible for the revised official statement to be delivered to the customer by settlement. The commentator suggests that, under these circumstances, the timing requirement under rule G-32 should be based on the sending rather than the delivery of the official statement.

        The Board is proposing a draft amendment to rule G-32 that would permit a dealer to sell, pursuant to a periodic plan, a municipal fund security to a customer who has previously received the official statement so long as it sends to the customer a copy of any new, supplemented, amended or stickered official statement promptly upon receipt from the issuer. The draft amendment also would except municipal fund securities for which periodic statements in lieu of transaction confirmations are provided from the requirement that information on the underwriting arrangements (which information would be limited to the fees paid to the dealer by the issuer) be provided to customers by settlement so long as such information is disclosed at least annually and information on any fee changes paid by the issuer to the dealer be sent to customers simultaneously with or prior to the sending of the next periodic statement.

        Rule G-33, on Calculations. The Board did not propose amending rule G-33 in the March Notice. One commentator states that this rule should be revised to eliminate references to par value, yield dollar price, maturity date and interest for purposes of municipal fund securities. By its terms, rule G-33 applies only to municipal securities that bear interest or are sold at a discount. Since municipal fund securities do not bear interest and are not sold at a discount, rule G-33 would by its nature not apply. Therefore, no change has been made to rule G-33.

        Rule G-34, on CUSIP Numbers and Depository Eligibility. The draft amendments would exempt municipal fund securities from the requirements of rule G-34 since no secondary market is expected to develop.⁽⁷¹⁾ The Board did not receive comments on, and has not revised, this draft amendment.

        Rule G-36, on Delivery of Official Statements and Form G-36(OS) to the Board. The Board did not propose amending rule G-36 in the March Notice but did state that, consistent with SEC staff's view regarding the sale in primary offerings of municipal fund securities, dealers acting as underwriters in primary offerings of municipal fund securities would be subject to the requirements of rule G-36. Thus, unless such primary offering falls within one of the stated exemptions in Rule 15c2-12, the Board expects that the dealer would receive a final official statement from the issuer or its agent under its contractual agreement entered into pursuant to Rule 15c2-12(b)(3). Such official statement should be received from the issuer in sufficient time for the dealer to send the official statement, together with Form G-36(OS), to the Board within one business day of receipt but no later than 10 business days after any final agreement to purchase, offer, or sell the municipal fund securities.⁽⁷²⁾ Since municipal fund securities remain in their underwriting period so long as they continue to be sold and delivered, the dealer would remain obligated under rule G-36(d) to send to the Board, within one business day of receipt, any amendments made to the official statement during such extended underwriting period.⁽⁷³⁾ No change has been made to rule G-36.

        Rule G-37, on Political Contributions and Prohibitions on Municipal Securities Business, and Rule G-38, on Consultants. The Board did not propose amending rules G-37 and G-38 in the March Notice but did reminded dealers that the definition of municipal securities business under such rules includes the purchase of a primary offering from the issuer on other than a competitive bid basis or the offer or sale of a primary offering on behalf of any issuer. Thus, a dealer's transactions in municipal fund securities may impact upon such dealer's obligations under rules G-37 and G-38. No changes have been made to rules G-37 and G-38.

* * * * *

Comments from all interested parties are welcome. Comments should be submitted no later than November 1, 1999, and may be directed to Ernesto A. Lanza, Associate General Counsel. Written comments will be available for public inspection.

August 27, 1999

 

TEXT OF DRAFT AMENDMENTS⁽⁷⁴⁾

Rule A-13. Underwriting and Transaction Assessments for Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) Underwriting Assessments - Scope. Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall pay to the Board an underwriting fee as set forth in section (b) for all municipal securities purchased from an issuer by or through such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, whether acting as principal or agent, as part of a primary offering, provided that section (b) of this rule shall not apply to a primary offering of securities if all such securities in the primary offering:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) at the option of the holder thereof, may be tendered to an issuer of such securities or its designated agent for redemption or purchase at par value or more at least as frequently as every nine months until maturity, earlier redemption, or purchase by an issuer or its designated agent; or

        (iv) have authorized denominations of $100,000 or more and are sold to no more than thirty-five persons each of whom the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer reasonably believes: (A) has the knowledge and experience necessary to evaluate the merits and risks of the investment; and (B) is not purchasing for more than one account, with a view toward distributing the securities; or

        (v) constitute municipal fund securities.

If a syndicate or similar account has been formed for the purchase of the securities, the underwriting fee shall be paid by the managing underwriter on behalf of each participant in the syndicate or similar account.

(b)-(f) No change.

Rule D-12. "Municipal Fund Security"

The term "municipal fund security" shall mean a municipal security issued by an issuer that, but for the application of Section 2(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, would constitute an investment company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Rule G-3. Classification of Principals and Representatives; Numerical Requirements; Testing; Continuing Education Requirements

No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or person who is a municipal securities representative, municipal securities principal, municipal securities sales principal or financial and operations principal (as hereafter defined) shall be qualified for purposes of rule G-2 unless such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or person meets the requirements of this rule.

(a) Municipal Securities Representative.

        (i) No change.

        (ii) Qualification Requirements.

        (A)-(B) No change.

        (C) The requirements of subparagraph (a)(ii)(A) of this rule shall not apply to any person who is duly qualified as a limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products by reason of having taken and passed the Limited Representative - Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Examination, but only if such person's activities with respect to municipal securities described in paragraph (a)(i) of this rule are limited solely to municipal fund securities.

        (D) Any person who ceases to be associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer (whether as a municipal securities representative or otherwise) for two or more years at any time after having qualified as a municipal securities representative in accordance with subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) shall again meet the requirements of subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) prior to being qualified as a municipal securities representative.

        (iii) Apprenticeship.

        (A) Any person who first becomes associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in a representative capacity (whether as a municipal securities representative, or general securities representative or limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products) without having previously qualified as a municipal securities representative, or general securities representative or limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products shall be permitted to function in a representative capacity without qualifying pursuant to subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) for a period of at least 90 days following the date such person becomes associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, provided, however, that such person shall not transact business with any member of the public with respect to, or be compensated for transactions in, municipal securities during such 90 day period, regardless of such person's having qualified in accordance with the examination requirements of this rule. A person subject to the requirements of this paragraph (a)(iii) shall in no event continue to perform any of the functions of a municipal securities representative after 180 days following the commencement of such person's association with such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, unless such person qualifies as a municipal securities representative pursuant to subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B).

        (B) Prior experience, of at least 90 days, as a general securities representative, limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products mutual fund salesperson or limited representative - government securities representative, will meet the requirements of this paragraph (a)(iii).

(b)-(h) No change.

Rule G-8. Books and Records to be Made by Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) Description of Books and Records Required to be Made. Except as otherwise specifically indicated in this rule, every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall make and keep current the following books and records, to the extent applicable to the business of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (i) Records of Original Entry. "Blotters" or other records of original entry containing an itemized daily record of all purchases and sales of municipal securities, all receipts and deliveries of municipal securities (including certificate numbers and, if the securities are in registered form, an indication to such effect), all receipts and disbursement of cash with respect to transactions in municipal securities, all other debits and credits pertaining to transactions in municipal securities, and in the case of brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers, all other cash receipts and disbursements if not contained in the records required by any other provision of this rule. The records of original entry shall show the name or other designation of the account for which each such transaction was effected (whether effected for the account of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, the account of a customer, or otherwise), the description of the securities, the aggregate par value of the securities, the dollar price or yield and aggregate purchase or sale price of the securities, accrued interest, the trade date, and the name or other designation of the person from whom purchased or received or to whom sold or delivered. With respect to accrued interest and information relating to "when issued" transactions which may not be available at the time a transaction is effected, entries setting forth such information shall be made promptly as such information becomes available. Dollar price, yield and accrued interest relating to any transaction shall be required to be shown only to the extent required to be included in the confirmation delivered by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in connection with such transaction under rule G-12 or rule G-15.

        (ii)-(viii) No change.

        (ix) Copies of Confirmations, Periodic Statements and Certain Other Notices to Customers. A copy of all confirmations of purchase or sale of municipal securities, of all periodic written statements disclosing purchases, sales or redemptions of municipal fund securities pursuant to rule G-15(a)(viii) and, in the case of a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer other than a bank dealer, of all other notices sent to customers concerning debits and credits to customer accounts or, in the case of a bank dealer, notices of debits and credits for municipal securities, cash and other items with respect to transactions in municipal securities.

        (x) No change.

        (xi) Customer Account Information. A record for each customer, other than an institutional account, setting forth the following information to the extent applicable to such customer:

        (A)-(G) No change.

        (H) signature of municipal securities representative, and general securities representative or limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products introducing the account and signature of a municipal securities principal, municipal securities sales principal or general securities principal indicating acceptance of the account;

        (I)-(K) No change.

For purposes of this subparagraph, the terms "general securities representative," and "general securities principal" and "limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products" shall mean such persons as so defined by the rules of a national securities exchange or registered securities association. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "institutional account" shall mean the account of (i) a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or registered investment company; (ii) an investment adviser registered either with the Commission under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or with a state securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions); or (iii) any other entity (whether a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust, or otherwise) with total assets of at least $50 million. Anything in this subparagraph to the contrary notwithstanding, every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall maintain a record of the information required by items (A), (C), (F), (H), (I) and (K) of this subparagraph with respect to each customer which is an institutional account.

        (xii)-(xix) No change.

(b)-(f) No change.

(g) Price substituted for par value of municipal fund securities. For purposes of this rule, each reference to the term "par value," when applied to a municipal fund security, shall be substituted with (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

Rule G-14. Reports of Sales or Purchases

(a) No change.

(b) Transactions Reporting Requirements.

        (i) Each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall report to the Board or its designee information about its transactions in municipal securities to the extent required by, and using the formats and within the timeframes specified in, Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures. Transaction information collected by the Board under this rule will be used to make public reports of market activity and prices and to assess transaction fees. The transaction information will be made available by the Board to the Commission, securities associations registered under Section 15A of the Act and other appropriate regulatory agencies defined in Section 3(a)(34)(A) of the Act to assist in the inspection for compliance with and the enforcement of Board rules.

        (ii)-(iii) No change.

Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures

(a) No change.

(b) Customer Transactions.

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) The following transactions shall not be required to be reported under this section (b):

        (A) A a transaction in a municipal security that is ineligible for assignment of a CUSIP number by the Board or its designee; and shall not be required to be reported under this section (b).

        (B) a transaction in a municipal fund security.

        (iv) No change.

Rule G-15. Confirmation, Clearance and Settlement of Transactions with Customers

(a) Customer Confirmations

        (i) At or before the completion of a transaction in municipal securities with or for the account of a customer, each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall give or send to the customer a written confirmation that complies with the requirements of this paragraph (i):

        (A) Transaction information. The confirmation shall include information regarding the terms of the transaction as set forth in this subparagraph (A):

        (1)-(2) No change.

        (3) Par value. The par value of the securities shall be shown, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) No change.

        (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, in place of par value, the confirmation shall show (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the total purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the total sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

        (4) No change.

        (5) Yield and dollar price. Yields and dollar prices shall be computed and shown in the following manner, subject to the exceptions stated in subparagraph (A)(5)(d) of this paragraph:

        (a)-(c) No change.

        (d) Notwithstanding the requirements noted in subparagraphs (A)(5)(a) through (c) of this paragraph, above:

        (i)-(v) No change.

        (vi) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, neither yield nor dollar price shall be shown.

        (6) Final Monies. The following information relating to the calculation and display of final monies shall be shown:

        (a) No change.

        (b) amount of accrued interest, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no figure for accrued interest shall be shown;

        (c) if the securities pay interest on a current basis but are traded without interest, a notation of "flat;"

        (d) extended principal amount, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (i) No change.

        (ii) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no extended principal amount shall be shown;

        (e)-(h) No change.

        (7) Delivery of securities. The following information regarding the delivery of securities shall be shown:

        (a) Securities other than bonds or municipal fund securities. For securities other than bonds or municipal fund securities, denominations to be delivered;

        (b) No change.

        (c) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, the purchase price, exclusive of commission, of each share or unit and the number of shares or units to be delivered;

        (d) Delivery instructions. Instructions, if available, regarding receipt or delivery of securities, and form of payment, if other than as usual and customary between the parties.

        (8) No change.

        (B) Securities identification information. The confirmation shall include a securities identification which includes, at a minimum:

        (1) the name of the issuer, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) For stripped coupon securities, the trade name and series designation assigned to the stripped coupon municipal security by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer sponsoring the program must be shown;

        (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, the name used by the issuer to identify such securities and, to the extent necessary to differentiate the securities from other municipal fund securities of the issuer, any separate program series, portfolio or fund designation for such securities must be shown;

        (2) No change.

        (3) maturity date, if any, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) No change.

        (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no maturity date shall be shown;

        (4) interest rate, if any, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a)-(e) No change.

        (f) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no interest rate shall be shown;

        (C) Securities descriptive information. The confirmation shall include descriptive information about the securities which includes, at a minimum:

        (1)-(4) No change.

        (5) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, the information described in clauses (1) through (4) of this subparagraph (C) is not required to be shown; provided, however, that if the municipal fund securities are puttable or otherwise redeemable by the customer, the confirmation shall include a designation to that effect.

        (D) Disclosure statements:

        (1)-(2) No change.

        (3) The confirmation for securities for which a deferred commission or other charge is imposed upon redemption or as a condition for payment of principal or interest thereon shall include a statement that the customer may be required to make a payment of such deferred commission or other charge upon redemption of such securities or as a condition for payment of principal or interest thereon, as appropriate, and that information concerning such deferred commission or other charge will be furnished upon written request.

        (ii)-(iii) No change.

        (iv) Confirmation to customers who tender put option bonds or municipal fund securities. A broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer that has an interest in put option bonds (including acting as remarketing agent) and accepts for tender put option bonds from a customer, or that has an interest in municipal fund securities (including acting as agent for the issuer thereof) and accepts for redemption municipal fund securities tendered by a customer, is engaging in a transaction in such municipal securities and shall send a confirmation under paragraph (i) of this section.

        (v) No change.

        (vi) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

        (A)-(F) No change.

        (G) The term "periodic municipal fund security plan" shall mean any written authorization or arrangement for a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, acting as agent, to purchase, sell or redeem for a customer or group of customers one or more specific municipal fund securities, in specific amounts (calculated in security units or dollars), at specific time intervals and setting forth the commissions or charges to be paid by the customer in connection therewith (or the manner of calculating them).

        (H) The term "non-periodic municipal fund security program" shall mean any written authorization or arrangement for a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, acting as agent, to purchase, sell or redeem for a customer or group of customers one or more specific municipal fund securities, setting forth the commissions or charges to be paid by the customer in connection therewith (or the manner of calculating them) and either (1) providing for the purchase, sale or redemption of such municipal fund securities at the direction of the customer or customers or (2) providing for the purchase, sale or redemption of such municipal fund securities at the direction of the customer or customers as well as authorizing the purchase, sale or redemption of such municipal fund securities in specific amounts (calculated in security units or dollars) at specific time intervals.

        (vii) Price substituted for par value of municipal fund securities. For purposes of this rule, each reference to the term "par value," when applied to a municipal fund security, shall be substituted with (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

        (viii) Alternative periodic reporting for certain transactions in municipal fund securities. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section (a), a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may effect transactions in municipal fund securities with customers without giving or sending to such customer the written confirmation required by paragraph (i) of this section (a) at or before completion of each such transaction if:

        (A) such transactions are effected pursuant to a periodic municipal fund security plan or a non-periodic municipal fund security program; and

        (B) such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer gives or sends to such customer within five business days after the end of each quarterly period, in the case of a customer participating in a periodic municipal fund security plan, or each monthly period, in the case of a customer participating in a non-periodic municipal fund security program, a written statement disclosing, for each purchase, sale or redemption effected for or with, and each payment of investment earnings credited to or reinvested for, the account of such customer during the reporting period, the information required to be disclosed to customers pursuant to subparagraphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (i) of this section (a), with the information regarding each transaction clearly segregated; provided that it is permissible for the name and address of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and the customer to appear once at the beginning of the document; and

        (C) in the case of a periodic municipal fund security plan that consists of an arrangement involving a group of two or more customers and contemplating periodic purchases of municipal fund securities by each customer through a person designated by the group, such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (1) gives or sends to the designated person, at or before the completion of the transaction for the purchase of such municipal fund securities, a written notification of the receipt of the total amount paid by the group;

        (2) sends to anyone in the group who was a customer in the prior quarter and on whose behalf payment has not been received in the current quarter a quarterly written statement reflecting that a payment was not received on such customer's behalf; and

        (3) advises each customer in the group if a payment is not received from the designated person on behalf of the group within 10 days of a date certain specified in the arrangement for delivery of that payment by the designated person and either (a) thereafter sends to each customer the written confirmation described in paragraph (i) of this section (a) for the next three succeeding payments, or (b) includes in the quarterly statement referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) each date certain specified in the arrangement for delivery of a payment by the designated person and each date on which a payment received from the designated person is applied to the purchase of municipal fund securities;

        (D) such customer is provided with prior notification in writing disclosing the intention to send the written information referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) on a periodic basis in lieu of an immediate confirmation for each transaction; and

        (E) such customer has consented in writing to receipt of the written information referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) on a periodic basis in lieu of an immediate confirmation for each transaction; provided, however, that such customer consent shall not be required if (1) the customer participates in a periodic municipal fund security plan described in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph (viii), (2) the customer is not a natural person and participates in a non-periodic municipal fund security program or (3) the customer is a natural person that participates in a non-periodic municipal fund security program and the issuer has consented in writing to the use by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer of the periodic written information referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) in lieu of an immediate confirmation for each transaction with each customer participating in the non-periodic municipal fund security program.

(b)-(e) No change.

Rule G-26. Customer Account Transfers

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms have the following meanings:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) The term "nontransferable asset" means an asset that is incapable of being transferred from the carrying party to the receiving party because (A) it is an issue in default for which the carrying party does not possess the proper denominations to effect delivery and no transfer agent is available to re-register the securities, or (B) it is a municipal fund security which the issuer requires to be held in an account carried by one or more specified brokers, dealers or municipal securities dealers that does not include the receiving party.

(b) No change.

(c) Transfer Instructions.

        (i) No change.

        (ii) If an account includes any nontransferable assets, the carrying party must request, in writing and prior to or at the time of validation of the transfer instruction, further instructions from the customer with respect to the disposition of such assets. Such request shall provide the customer with the following alternative methods of disposition of nontransferable assets, if applicable:

        (A) No change.

        (B) retention by the carrying party for the customer's benefit; or

        (C) in the case of a nontransferable asset described in section (a)(iii)(B), transfer to another broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, if any, which the issuer has specified as being permitted to carry such asset.

(d)-(i) No change.

Rule G-32. Disclosures in Connection with New Issues

(a) Customer Disclosure Requirements. No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall sell, whether as principal or agent, any new issue municipal securities to a customer unless such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer delivers to the customer no later than the settlement of the transaction:

        (i) a copy of the official statement in final form prepared by or on behalf of the issuer or, if an official statement in final form is not being prepared by or on behalf of the issuer, a written notice to that effect together with a copy of an official statement in preliminary form, if any; provided, however, that:

        (A) if a customer who participates in a periodic municipal fund security plan has previously received a copy of the official statement in final form in connection with the purchase of municipal fund securities under such plan, a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may sell additional shares or units of the municipal fund securities under such plan to the customer if such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer sends to the customer a copy of any new, supplemented, amended or "stickered" official statement in final form, by first class mail or other equally prompt means, promptly upon receipt thereof; or

        (B) if an official statement in final form is being prepared for new issue municipal securities issued in a primary offering that qualifies for the exemption set forth in paragraph (iii) of section (d)(1) of Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12, a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may sell such new issue municipal securities to a customer if such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (A)-(B) Renumbered as (1)-(2).

        (ii) in connection with a negotiated sale of new issue municipal securities, the following information concerning the underwriting arrangements:

        (A) the underwriting spread, if any;

        (B) the amount of any fee received by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer as agent for the issuer in the distribution of the securities; provided, however, that if a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer selling municipal fund securities provides periodic statements to the customer pursuant to rule G-15(a)(viii) in lieu of individual transaction confirmations, this paragraph (ii)(B) shall be deemed to be satisfied if the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer provides this information to the customer at least annually and provides information regarding any change in such fee on or prior to the sending of the next succeeding periodic statement to the customer; and

        (C) except with respect to an issue of municipal fund securities, the initial offering price for each maturity in the issue that is offered or to be offered in whole or in part by the underwriters, including maturities that are not reoffered.

(b) Inter-Dealer Disclosure Requirements. Every broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall send, upon request, the documents and information referred to in this section (a) to any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to which it sells new issue municipal securities no later than the business day following the request or, if an official statement in final form is being prepared but has not been received from the issuer or its agent, no later than the business day following such receipt. Such items shall be sent by first call mail or other equally prompt means, unless the purchasing broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer arranges some other method of delivery and pays or agrees to pay for such delivery.

(b)-(c) Relettered as (c)-(d).

Rule G-34. CUSIP Numbers and New Issue Requirements

(a)-(b) No change.

(c) CUSIP Number Eligibility Exemptions. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to an issue of municipal securities (or for the purpose of section (b) any part of an outstanding maturity of an issue) which (i) does not meet the eligibility criteria for CUSIP number assignment or (ii) consists entirely of municipal fund securities.

 

---

ENDNOTES

1. See "Municipal Fund Securities," MSRB Reports, Vol. 19, No. 2 (April 1999) at 9.

2. The Board understands that local government pools are established by state or local governmental entities as trusts that serve as vehicles for the pooled investment of public moneys of participating governmental entities. Participants purchase interests in the trust and trust assets are invested in a manner consistent with the trust's stated investment objectives. Investors generally do not have a right to control investment of trust assets. See generally National Association of State Treasurers ("NAST"), Special Report: Local Government Investment Pools (July 1995) (the "NAST Report"); Standard & Poor's Fund Services, Local Government Investment Pools (May 1999) (the "S&P Report").

3. The Board understands that higher education trusts generally are established by states under section 529(b) of the Internal Revenue Code as "qualified state tuition programs" through which individuals make investments for the purpose of accumulating savings for qualifying higher education costs of beneficiaries. Individuals purchase interests in the trust and trust assets are invested in a manner consistent with the trust's stated investment objectives. Investors do not have a right to control investment of trust assets. See generally College Savings Plans Network, Special Report on State and College Savings Plans (1998) (the "CSPN Report").

4. Letter dated February 26, 1999 from Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, SEC, to Diane G. Klinke, General Counsel of the Board, in response to letter dated June 2, 1998 from Diane G. Klinke to Catherine McGuire, published as Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 032299033 (Feb. 26, 1999) (the "SEC Letter").

5. Dealers also should consider the applicability of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12. SEC staff has stated:

[W]e note that Rule 15c2-12(f)(7) under the Exchange Act defines a "primary offering" as including an offering of municipal securities directly or indirectly by or on behalf of an issuer of such securities. Based upon an analysis of programs that have been brought to our attention, it appears that interests in local government pools or higher education trusts generally are offered only by direct purchase from the issuer. Accordingly, we would view those interests as having been sold in a "primary offering" as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. If a dealer is acting as an "underwriter" (as defined in Rule 15c2-12(f)(8)) in connection with that primary offering, the dealer may be subject to the requirements of Rule 15c2-12.

SEC Letter, supra note 4. Questions on Rule 15c2-12 should be directed to SEC staff.

6. See "Transactions in Municipal Collateralized Mortgage Obligations: Rule G-15," MSRB Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1 (April 1992) at 21; "Stripped Coupon Municipal Securities," MSRB Reports, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March 1989) at 3; "Taxable Securities," MSRB Reports, Vol. 6, No. 5 (Oct. 1986) at 5; "Tender Option Programs: SEC Response to Board Letter," MSRB Reports, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Feb. 1985) at 3; "Tax-Exempt Notes: Notice Concerning Application of Board Rules to Such Notes and of Filing of Rule Change," MSRB Reports, Vol. 2, No. 7 (Oct./Nov. 1982) at 17; "Application of Board's Rules to Municipal Commercial Paper," MSRB Reports, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jan. 1982) at 9 (the "CP Notice"); "Application of Board's Rules to Participation Interests in Municipal Tax-Exempt Financing Arrangements," MSRB Reports, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jan. 1982) at 13; "Notice Concerning Application of Board's Rules to MAC Warrants," [1977-1987 Transfer Binder] MSRB Manual (CCH) � 10,171 (Jan. 22, 1981) (the "Warrant Notice").

7. Section 2(b) provides that the Investment Company Act shall not apply to a state, or any political subdivision of a state, or any agency, authority, or instrumentality thereof.

8. As noted in the March Notice, the definition of municipal fund security is not limited to local government pool or higher education trust interests that are municipal securities but also would apply to any municipal security of an issuer that, but for the identity of the issuer as a state or local governmental entity, would constitute an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

9. Municipal fund securities generally provide investment return and are valued based on the investment performance of an underlying pool of assets having an aggregate value that may increase or decrease from day to day, rather than providing interest payments at a stated rate or discount, as is the case for more traditional municipal securities. In addition, unlike traditional municipal securities, these interests do not have stated par values or maturity dates and cannot be priced based on yield or dollar price. See generally NAST Report, supra note 2; S&P Report, supra note 2; CSPN Report, supra note 3.

10. A commentator states that, although the Board has no authority to regulate either local government pool or higher education trust interests, it believes that interested parties would not resist "appropriate regulation" of higher education trust interests. It states that regulation of transactions in such interests is "arguably both more important and less controversial" than regulation of local government pool interests, noting that higher education trust interests "clearly affect public investors and the public interest."

11. Commentators observe that municipal securities are defined in Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act as "securities which are direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal or interest by, a State or any political subdivision thereof," in contrast to the language used in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 regarding any "security issued or guaranteed ... by any State of the United States, or by any political subdivision of a State or Territory." They quote a Senate report statement on the Securities Acts Amendments that "'municipal securities' refers to debt obligations of state and local government issuers." Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, S.Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 38 (1975) (the "1975 Senate Report"); but cf. Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 229, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 101 (1975) (the "1975 Conference Report") (amendments "provide a comprehensive pattern for the registration and regulation of securities firms and banks which underwrite and trade securities issued by States and municipalities") (emphasis added). They note references in SEC no-action letters to obligations under the Internal Revenue Code to support their position that municipal securities are limited to debt obligations. See Itel Corp., SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 100581018 (Oct. 1, 1981) (the "Itel Letter"); Bedford-Watt Enterprises, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 062678019 (June 9, 1978) (the "Bedford-Watt Letter"). In addition, an SEC no-action letter is cited to suggest that an equity security may not be a municipal security. See City Employees' Retirement System of the City of Los Angeles, SEC No-Action Letter, [1977-1978 Dec.] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) � 81,194 (May 12, 1977) (the "CERS Letter").

12. Thus, non-dealer firms may act as investment advisers to local government pool or higher education trust programs and not become subject to Board rules.

13. SEC Letter, supra note 4.

14. See, e.g., Maine College Savings Program Fund, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 080999001 (Aug. 2, 1999) (the "Maine Letter");Teachers Personal Investors Services, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 092898006 (Sept. 10, 1998) (the "TPIS Letter"); New Hampshire Higher Education Savings Plan Trust, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 070698010 (June 30, 1998) (the "New Hampshire Letter"); Public Employees Retirement Board of the State of Oregon, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 041398009 (March 3, 1998) (the "Oregon Letter"); North Carolina State Education Assistance Authority, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 032497016 (March 24, 1997) (the "North Carolina Letter"); Missouri Family Trust Fund, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 101392001 (Sept. 22, 1992) (the "Missouri Letter").

15. Maine Letter, supra note 14. SEC staff's position was conditioned on the dealer complying with all existing Board rules, other than those proposed to be amended in the March Notice, and complying with all Board rules upon completion of the current Board rulemaking process. Counsel had opined that the interests were direct obligations of an instrumentality of a state and therefore were municipal securities within the meaning of Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act. See id. and accompanying letter of inquiry.

16. TPIS Letter, supra note 14. SEC staff stated that this no-action position expires six months after rule G-3 is amended to establish qualification requirements for persons selling such interests.

17. Id. Counsel had opined that the interests were direct obligations of an instrumentality of a state and, therefore, were municipal securities under the Exchange Act. See id. and accompanying letter of inquiry. See also New York State College Choice Tuition Savings Trust, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 091498008 (Sept. 10, 1998) and accompanying letter of inquiry.

18. See, e.g., Maine Letter, supra note 14; New Hampshire Letter, supra note 14; North Carolina Letter, supra note 14.

19. See Maine Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry; New Hampshire Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry; North Carolina Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry. See also Missouri Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry.

20. See Oregon Letter, supra note 14. Counsel opined that the interests would be exempt from the registration requirements of the Exchange Act as securities issued by a state instrumentality. See id. and accompanying letter of inquiry. See also Pennsylvania Local Government Investment Trust, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 022283009 (Feb. 21, 1983) (the "Pennsylvania Letter") and accompanying letter of inquiry, in which counsel opined that interests in a local government pool were municipal securities under the Exchange Act that qualified for the exemption from the registration requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. SEC staff did not expressly rely on this opinion in arriving at its no-action position.

21. See, e.g., City of El Paso de Robles, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 111285020 (June 18, 1985) (the "El Paso de Robles Letter"); MAC Warrant Notice, supra note 6. The SEC's position with respect to these two types of non-debt securities stands in contrast to SEC staff's earlier position regarding call options in the CERS Letter, supra note 11.

22. See El Paso de Robles Letter, supra note 21.

23. MAC Warrant Notice, supra note 6. The MAC Warrant Notice was cited with approval by SEC staff in a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. See letter dated August 12, 1981 (note 7) from Thomas G. Lovett, Attorney, SEC, to Owen Carney, Director, Investment Securities Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "CP Letter"), reprinted in CP Notice, supra note 6, at 11.

24. See Itel Letter, supra note 11 (term "obligation" in Exchange Act definition of municipal security "would generally include" obligations under the Internal Revenue Code); Bedford-Watt Letter, supra note 11 (Internal Revenue Code "provides a useful analogy"). In the Bedford-Watt Letter, SEC staff recognized that "obligation" under Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act could include non-financial obligations to take actions needed for payment of the security. See also Pennsylvania Letter and accompanying letter of inquiry, supra note 20. In arriving at its opinion that the local government pool interests described in the Pennsylvania Letter were municipal securities, counsel suggested, in reference to the definition of municipal securities in the Exchange Act, "that the word 'obligations' need not be read as 'debt' in this context. The Trust is under obligation to redeem all Shares of Beneficial Interest presented for redemption." In addition, the Chairman of the College Savings Plans Network noted in Congressional testimony that "state-sponsored college tuition programs are secured by the moral or political obligation of the states." Marshall Bennett, Testimony Before the House Committee on Ways and Means, Hearing on Reducing the Tax Burden: II. Providing Tax Relief to Strengthen the Family and Sustain a Strong Economy, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (June 23, 1999), available at <http://www.house.gov/ways_means/fullcomm/106cong/6-23-99/6-23benn.htm> (visited Aug. 26, 1999) (emphasis added).

25. See El Paso de Robles Letter, supra note 21; MAC Warrant Notice, supra note 6.

26. See 1975 Senate Report, supra note 11, at 90, 92.

27. Id. at 92.

28. See, e.g., House Comm. on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Federal Supervision of Traffic in Investment Securities in Interstate Commerce, H.R.Rep. No. 85, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. 6, 14 (1933) (the "1933 House Report").

29. Id. at 14. This view was confirmed the following year during House committee hearings on the Exchange Act by the Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, which was charged with enforcing the Securities Act. See Stock Exchange Regulation: Hearing on H.R. 7852 and H.R. 8720 Before the House Comm. on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. 899 (1934) (the "1934 House Hearings") (statement of James M. Landis, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission). Commissioner Landis stated:

We had that same problem up in the Securities Act, where the exemption that is given to what might be called municipal bonds, and bonds of States and their instrumentalities, and is drawn according to a line that parallels the line that is drawn which makes tax-exempt municipal bonds, State instrumentalities, and so on. In other words, every instrumentality of a State which, like a municipality, or a political subdivision of a State, was exempted from taxation, would be exempted from registration upon an issue of securities. That is the line drawn in the Securities Act. If exempt from taxation they are also exempted from the necessity of registration under that act.

30. See, e.g., Securities Act: Hearings on S. 875 Before the Senate Comm. on Banking and Currency on S. 875, 73d Cong., 1st. Sess. 65 (1933) (the "1933 Senate Hearings") (statement of Sen. Reynolds); id. at 228, 232 (statement of Sen. Kean); id. at 232 (statement of Sen. Costigan); id. at 303 (statement of Sen. Norbeck); 77 Cong. Rec. 2925 (1933) (statement of Rep. Studley).

31. See 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 822 (statement of Rep. Pettingill); id. at 898-9 (statements of James M. Landis, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission; Rep. Pettingill). This concern also served as a primary basis for the exemption of municipal securities under the Securities Act. See 1933 House Report, supra note 28, at 14, and text accompanying note 29 above.

32. See 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 721, 911-3 (statement of Rep. Holmes); Stock Exchange Practices: Hearings on S. Res. 84 and S. Res. 56 and S. Res. 97 Before the Senate Comm. on Banking and Currency, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. 7441-52 (1934) (the "1934 Senate Hearings") (statements of Archibald B. Roosevelt, Roosevelt & Weifold, Inc.; George B. Gibbons, George B. Gibbons & Co.; Sen. Gore; Sen. Goldsborough).

33. See 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 720 (statement of Rep. Holmes).

34. See 1934 Senate Hearings, supra note 32, at 7413 (statements of H.H. Cotton, Investment Bank of Los Angeles; Ferdinand Pecora, Counsel to the Committee; Sen. Fletcher); id. at 7477 (statements of Tom K. Smith, Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury; Sen. Adams; Sen. Walcott); 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 7201(statements of Tom K. Smith, Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury; Rep. Holmes); id. at 819-23 (statements of George B. Gibbons, George B. Gibbons & Co.; Rep. Merritt; Rep. Rayburn; Rep. Pettengill).

35. See note 29 above and accompanying text.

36. The phrase "security issued or guaranteed by" used in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act introduces bank securities (including bank equity securities) as well as government and municipal securities. In contrast, the phrase "securities which are direct obligations of or obligations guaranteed as to principal or interest by" used in Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act introduced only municipal and government securities. Thus, even though the drafters of both the Securities Act and the Exchange Act thought of municipal and government securities solely as debt securities, the term "obligation" (to the extent such term is limited to debt securities) could only be used in the Exchange Act.

37. 1975 Senate Report, supra note 11, at 47. See also CP Letter (note 7), supra note 23.

38. In testimony at a 1975 Senate committee hearing on the Securities Acts Amendments, a representative of the Municipal Finance Officers Association stated that the municipal securities market "is completely a debt market." Securities Acts Amendments of 1975: Hearings on S. 249 Before the Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 479 (1975) (statement of Michael S. Zarin, Member, Comm. on Governmental Debt Administration, Municipal Finance Officers Association). Having been so informed, the Senate's description in the 1975 Senate Report, supra note 11, at 38, of municipal securities as "debt obligations of state and local government issuers," as noted by some commentators on the March Notice, in fact merely reflected an understanding of the nature of the municipal securities market at such time, not an understanding that the Exchange Act definition of municipal securities was to be limited only to the debt segment of a broader municipal market that might also include equity securities.

39. As noted above, one commentator concedes that interests in higher education trusts "clearly affect public investors and the public interest."

40. Commentators list Congressional concern about unconscionable markups, churning of accounts, misrepresentations, disregard of suitability standards, high-pressure sales techniques, fraudulent trading practices resulting in substantial losses to public investors, and threats to the integrity of the local government capital-raising system. They argue that there is no opportunity for unconscionable markups and little incentive for churning of accounts or use of high-pressure sales techniques for these interests because they are purchased and redeemed at the current net asset value and purchasers do not pay commissions. Commentators also argue that suitability concerns are not raised since local government pools are operated like money market funds and invest solely in the types of investments that their participants are permitted by state law to purchase.

41. One commentator states that protections exist under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, state regulations, voluntary adherence to the Investment Company Act and related federal regulations applicable to investment company securities, and Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 31 relating to accounting and financial reporting for certain investments and for external investment pools.

42. See 1975 Conference Report, supra note 11, at 101.

43. As originally proposed, rule D-9 would have excluded from the definition of customer "the issuer of securities which are the subject of the transaction in question." See "Notice of Filing of Fair Practice Rules," [1977-1987 Transfer Binder] MSRB Manual (CCH) � 10,030 (Sept. 20, 1977). In amending the original proposed rule language to limit this exclusion solely to "the issuer in connection with the sale of a new issue of its securities," the Board stated that it believed "that the protections afforded customers by its rules should be extended to issuers when they act in secondary market transactions." See "Notice of Filing of Amendments to Fair Practice Rules," [1977-1987 Transfer Binder] MSRB Manual (CCH) � 10,058 (Feb. 28, 1978). Given that the Board has always felt that issuers should be considered customers even in secondary market transactions involving their own securities, issuers certainly should be considered customers in transactions involving securities of other issuers. Furthermore, in Congressional testimony on the bankruptcy filing of Orange County, California and its local government pool, SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt discussed customer protection rules of self-regulatory organizations as they may apply to state or local governmental entities acting as customers. See Derivative Financial Instruments Relating to Banks and Financial Institutions: Hearings Before the Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. (1995) ("SEC Testimony").

44. S&P Report, supra note 2, at 3, 6-11. The Board takes no position as to which of these local government pools may issue interests that would constitute municipal fund securities.

45. Id. at 3.

46. One commentator identifies several state-run and county-run pools (including the Orange County, California pool) as having had recent financial difficulties. See also NAST Report, supra note 2, at 2, 5, 38; S&P Report, supra note 2, at 5.

47. NAST has stated that it:

recognizes that potential pool participants have numerous alternative investment vehicles from which to choose. The goal of the … [NAST Guidelines for Local Government Investment Pools] is to insure that local government investment officials, when choosing among their available investment options, are fully aware of significant investment and administrative policies, practices and restrictions of the pool and are thereby able to make informed investment decisions on behalf of the local governments. … NAST further recommends that the broker/dealer community govern itself to follow the same standards of conduct NAST has recommended for treasurers.

NAST Report, supra note 2, at 8. As the self-regulatory organization established by Congress to adopt rules for dealer transactions in municipal securities, the Board has created a body of rules which, together with these proposed rule changes, constitute the self-governance and standards of conduct which NAST has recommended be established.

48. The Board understands that investment strategies, pay-out restrictions, and fees and redemption charges or penalties of the existing higher education trusts vary. At least some higher education trusts permit sales of interests to persons living in other states and permit redemption proceeds to be used to pay higher education expenses in any state. In other cases, redemption proceeds may be limited for use within a specific state. See generally CSPN Report, supra note 3. Thus, a single customer may have a choice of investments in various higher education trusts having widely differing investment strategies and terms. The Board takes no position as to which of these higher education trusts may issue interests that would constitute municipal fund securities.

49. See NAST Report, supra note 2, at 8 ("The investment alternatives offered by brokers/dealers to public finance officials should be suitable for the public entity's objectives."). The fact that a local government pool's assets are invested in investments that are legally available as direct investments by local governments does not resolve suitability issues. See note 39 above. As with transactions in any other municipal security, rule G-19 would require a dealer recommending a transaction in a municipal fund security to have reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable, based upon information available from the issuer or otherwise and the facts disclosed by or otherwise known about the customer. These suitability requirements do not differ in substance from those of the NASD, to which dealers effecting transactions in such interests might otherwise be subject if these interests are not municipal securities. See also SEC Testimony, supra note 43.

50. See, e.g., Sections 15(b)(3) and 15B(a)(3) of the Exchange Act.

51. Actual interpretations relating to how certain rules would be applied to transactions in municipal fund securities would be filed with the SEC to the extent required under Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 19b-4.

52. This view regarding sales of municipal fund securities as part of a primary offering is based on SEC staff's statement in the SEC Letter, supra note 4, that it would view such securities as having been sold in a primary offering for purposes of Rule 15c2-12.

53. Two commentators suggest that the Board exempt municipal fund securities from the prohibition in rule A-13(e) from passing through underwriting assessments to issuers.

54. Commentators note that many local government pools have annual share turn-over rates of 3 to 4 times their assets, due to the fact that many participants are investing short-term funds that move in and out of the pools frequently during the course of the year. Another commentator believes that this multiplier may reach as high as 10 times assets. One commentator estimates that total issuances of interests in local government pools may be on the same order of magnitude as issuances of traditional municipal securities.

55. In the alternative, some commentators suggest that underwriting assessments should be based on net issuances of municipal fund securities, taking into account all securities retired. Another commentator suggests a flat annual or monthly fee set at a modest level.

56. Two commentators suggest that local government pool interests be excluded from this definition. The Board declines to do so for the reasons noted above.

57. Thus, an associated person who sells both municipal fund securities and other types of municipal securities would be required to qualify as a municipal securities representative or general securities representative.

58. One commentator suggests exempting dealers in local government pool interests from the requirement of having municipal securities principals, provided that they meet the requirements regarding principals established by the NASD. The Board believes that dealers effecting transactions in municipal fund securities must have a municipal securities principal who is required to be familiar with Board rules.

59. Several factors influenced the Board's determination to exempt such securities from rule G-14, as set forth in the March Notice. If the Board receives information in the future that practices have developed in the municipal fund security market that merit reporting of transaction information, it will consider whether to revisit the exemption from rule G-14.

60. Disclosure of deferred commissions or other charges would cover, for example, any deferred sales load or, in the case of interests in certain higher education trusts, any penalty imposed on a redemption that is not for a qualifying higher education expense.

61. In addition to the comments described below, one commentator suggests that the draft amendment relating to disclosure of deferred commissions or redemption charges be clarified to indicate that information may be disclosed in a program description document together with the confirmation or periodic statement. The Board believes that this provision does not require revision since it already permits disclosure of such information in a document separate from the confirmation or periodic statement, although the confirmation or periodic statement must disclose that such deferred commission or charge may exist and that information will be furnished upon written request.

62. They note that individual confirmations for the frequent purchases and redemptions of local government pool interests would impose high administrative and cost burdens.

63. It states that this would be "analogous to and consistent with" the provisions of Rule 10b-10 permitting periodic statements in lieu of confirmations for non-periodic transactions in tax-qualified individual retirement and individual pension plans.

64. In addition, the Board has made a minor language change to paragraph (a)(vi)(G) to make clearer that quarterly statements in lieu of individual confirmations also would be available for arrangements involving a group of two or more customers.

65. A commentator states that requiring customer consent to receive quarterly statements would impose administrative burdens on dealers that are not justified by any investor protection interest. It notes practical difficulties with sending confirmations to some members of a group plan and quarterly statements to others, stating that if the dealer fails to receive consent from any customer, it might be forced to send individual confirmations to all customers. The commentator states that, in adopting the investment company plan exception to the confirmation requirements in Rule 10b-10, the SEC recognized that securities sold through such plans do not require the same level of reporting as other securities transactions since their regularized nature raised fewer concerns about whether a particular transaction was executed consistent with the expectations of the customer.

66. A commentator states that municipal fund securities will not be issued in certificated form and therefore the delivery provisions under subparagraph (a)(i)(A)(7) would not be relevant. Subparagraph (a)(i)(A)(7) would require that the confirmation for a municipal fund security transaction indicate the purchase price (exclusive of commission) of each share or unit and the number of shares or units to be delivered, regardless of whether a physical or book-entry delivery of the securities will occur.

67. The commentator states that such securities are ineligible for ratings and such notation might be misleading. However, the Board notes that a relatively small number of local government pools have in fact been rated. See NAST Report, supra note 2, at 36. See generally S&P Report, supra note 2.

68. The Board understands that, in the context of local government pools, the term "yield" may be used to refer to historical returns that may be used as a basis for comparing investment performance. See NAST Report, supra note 2, at 8. References in rule G-21 to yield, consistent with its use in other Board rules, refer to a future rate of return on securities and do not refer to historical yields. The Board notes that any use of historical yields would be subject to section (c) of rule G-21, which provides that no dealer shall publish or cause to be published any advertisement concerning municipal securities which such dealer knows or has reason to know is materially false or misleading. Thus, a dealer advertisement of municipal fund securities that refers to yield typically would require a description of the nature and significance of the yield shown in the advertisement in order to assure that such advertisement is not false or misleading.

69. Rule G-32 defines underwriting period for securities purchased by a dealer (not in a syndicate) as the period commencing with the first submission to the dealer of an order for the purchase of the securities or the purchase of the securities from the issuer, whichever first occurs, and ending at such time as the following two conditions both are met: (1) the issuer delivers the securities to the dealer, and (2) the dealer no longer retains an unsold balance of the securities purchased from the issuer or 21 calendar days elapse after the date of the first submission of an order for the securities, whichever first occurs. However, since the issuer continuously delivers municipal fund securities, the first condition for the termination of the underwriting period remains unmet.

70. In addition, in the case of a repeat purchaser of municipal fund securities for which no official statement in final form is being prepared, no new delivery of the written notice to that effect or of any official statement in preliminary form would be required so long as the customer has previously received it in connection with a prior purchase. However, if an official statement in final form is subsequently prepared, the customer's next purchase would trigger the delivery requirement with respect to such official statement.

71. Dealers may still elect to acquire CUSIP numbers for municipal fund securities and to make such securities depository eligible, subject to meeting all of the eligibility requirements of the CUSIP Service Bureau and of any securities depository, respectively.

72. If the primary offering is exempt from Rule 15c2-12 (other than as a result of being a limited offering as described in section (d)(1)(i) of the Rule) and an official statement has been prepared by the issuer, then the dealer would be expected to send the official statement, together with Form G-36(OS), to the Board under rule G-36(c)(i).

73. Rule G-36(d) provides that a dealer that has previously sent an official statement to the Board also is required to send to the Board any amendments made by the issuer during the underwriting period. In view of the extended underwriting period for municipal fund securities and the possibility that the issuer may change the dealer that participates in the sale of the securities during the life of the program, the Board would interpret this provision of the rule to obligate any dealer that is at the time of an amendment then serving as underwriter for the municipal fund securities to send the amendment to the Board, regardless of whether that dealer or another dealer sent the original official statement to the Board.

74. Underlining indicates additions to existing Board rules; strikethrough indicates deletions from existing Board rules.

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

MUNICIPAL FUND SECURITIES - REVISED DRAFT RULE CHANGES

The Board is requesting further comments on revised draft rule changes relating to municipal fund securities. Comments are due by November 1, 1999.

        On March 17, 1999, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (the "Board") published a notice (the "March Notice") requesting comments on draft rule changes relating to transactions effected by or through brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers ("dealers") in municipal fund securities (as defined below).⁽¹⁾ The Board received comments from eleven commentators. After reviewing these comments, the Board has determined to republish the draft rule changes, with certain modifications and additions (including a revision to exempt municipal fund securities from underwriting assessments), for further comment from industry participants.

        The Board believes that many of the comments reflect a misunderstanding of the nature of the Board's rulemaking proposals and therefore the Board is taking this opportunity to clarify the scope and intent of these proposals. Specifically, the Board wishes to emphasize that the draft rule changes would not extend the reach of Board rules. Rather, they seek to make Board rules that are already applicable to municipal fund securities more accommodating to the unique features of such securities. Dealers should understand that Board rules apply to their transactions in any security that is a municipal security, regardless of whether the dealer is aware of the security's status. Although the Board does not have authority to direct enforcement of its rules, it is statutorily charged with determining the best means of protecting investors and the public interest in regard to dealer transactions in municipal securities. As such, the Board believes that, under the unique circumstances relating to municipal fund securities, enforcement of its rules with regard to transactions in such securities that occurred prior to the industry having been put on notice of their applicability would serve no substantial investor protection purpose, absent extraordinary circumstances or a showing of investor harm resulting from a material departure from standards of fairness generally applicable under the federal securities laws.

SCOPE AND INTENT OF BOARD RULEMAKING WITH RESPECT TO MUNICIPAL FUND SECURITIES

        Dealers that effect transactions in municipal securities are subject to the Board's jurisdiction pursuant to Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). In particular, Section 15B(c)(1) prohibits dealers from effecting transactions in, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of, a municipal security in contravention of any Board rule. Thus, since enactment of Section 15B and the creation of the Board in the Securities Acts Amendments of 1975 (the "Securities Acts Amendments"), a transaction effected by a dealer in a municipal security must be effected in conformity with Board rules.

        In the March Notice, the Board reviewed two types of state or local governmental programs involving investment interests in which dealers may effect transactions: pooled investment funds under trusts established by state or local governmental entities ("local government pools")⁽²⁾ and higher education savings plan trusts established by states ("higher education trusts").⁽³⁾ These programs had been brought to the Board's attention by staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). In response to a Board inquiry as to the SEC's position on whether interests in such programs were municipal securities, SEC staff stated that "at least some interests in local government pools and higher education trusts may be, depending on the facts and circumstances, 'municipal securities' for purposes of the Exchange Act."⁽⁴⁾

        Board rules do not apply to any interest in a local government pool or higher education trust that is not a municipal security. In addition, Board rules apply only to activities of dealers that effect municipal securities transactions. Thus, Board rules do not apply to an issuer of, or a non-dealer entity providing advice to issuers in regard to, municipal securities, including municipal fund securities. However, to the extent that interests in a local government pool or a higher education trust are municipal securities and dealers are effecting transactions in them, Board rules automatically govern such dealer transactions, without the necessity of further Board rulemaking^.(5) On several previous occasions, the Board has alerted the industry to the applicability of Board rules to (and has proposed rule changes to accommodate) transactions in new forms of municipal securities or pre-existing forms of securities that many in the industry had not previously recognized as municipal securities.⁽⁶⁾

        A municipal fund security is defined as a municipal security issued by an issuer that, but for Section 2(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the "Investment Company Act"),⁽⁷⁾ would constitute an investment company under that Act. Thus, Board rules on municipal fund securities would apply to interests in a state or local governmental trust, such as local government pools and higher education trusts,⁽⁸⁾ only if the following three conditions are met:

1. A dealer is engaging in transactions in such interests;
2. Such interests, in fact, constitute municipal securities; and
3. Such interests are issued by an issuer that, but for the exemption under Section 2(b) of the Investment Company Act, would be considered an investment company within the meaning of that Act.

        The Board understands that municipal fund securities may not have features typically associated with more traditional municipal securities. Instead, their features are similar to those of investment company securities.⁽⁹⁾ In the March Notice, the Board stated that, although its rules generally have been drafted to accommodate the characteristics of debt securities, it believes that most current rules can appropriately be applied to municipal fund securities. Nonetheless, the Board felt that certain rules should be amended to recognize the unique characteristics of municipal fund securities. The draft rule changes did not seek to extend the reach of Board rules, since the rules already apply to municipal fund securities, but sought to tailor certain Board rules to the nature of municipal fund securities.

DISCUSSION OF COMMENTS AND DRAFT RULE CHANGES

Authority of Board to Adopt Draft Rule Changes

        Comments Received. Some commentators state that the Board has no authority to regulate municipal fund securities, particularly local government pool interests.⁽¹⁰⁾ They state that such interests are not municipal securities under the Exchange Act. They argue that the term "municipal securities" is limited to debt obligations of municipal issuers and that interests in local government pools represent equity interests in trust assets, not debt obligations.⁽¹¹⁾ Another commentator questions whether Congress intended that the Board regulate local government pools when it created the Board.

        Board Response. As previously stated, a security must first be a municipal security in order to be a municipal fund security. The draft rule changes would not, and existing Board rules do not, apply to local government pool or higher education trust interests that are not municipal securities. Thus, the Board does not overstep its authority by regulating dealer transactions in municipal fund securities since, by definition, regulation is limited to interests that are municipal securities.

        A firm wishing to determine if Board rules apply to services it provides to an issuer of local government pool or higher education trust interests may seek advice of counsel as to whether (1) such services constitute broker-dealer activities, or (2) such interests are municipal securities. It may seek comfort on counsel's opinion from SEC staff through the SEC's no-action procedure. If a non-dealer firm's activities do not constitute broker-dealer activities, the firm need not be a registered broker or dealer subject to Board rules, even if the interests are municipal securities.⁽¹²⁾ If the interests are not municipal securities, the dealer need not comply with Board rules; however, the dealer's activities may be subject to Exchange Act provisions and SEC and National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD") rules, unless the interests otherwise qualify for an exemption (e.g., as exempted securities other than municipal securities) under the Exchange Act.

        Of course, the Board's rulemaking proposal is meaningful only if municipal fund securities, in fact, exist. As noted above, the Board sought comfort from SEC staff that local government pool and higher education trust interests are municipal securities. SEC staff replied that "at least some interests in local government pools and higher education trusts may be, depending on the facts and circumstances, 'municipal securities' for purposes of the Exchange Act."⁽¹³⁾ Although the Board is not empowered to determine whether a security is a municipal security within the meaning of Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act, the Board believes that, based on this SEC response as well as a close review of existing no-action letters and legislative history of the Securities Acts Amendments, the Exchange Act and the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), as discussed below, at least some interests in local government pools and higher education trusts are municipal securities.

        For example, in agreeing not to recommend enforcement action in several no-action letters, SEC staff relied on opinions of counsel that interests in state or local governmental trusts were municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽¹⁴⁾ In one instance, SEC staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action if a dealer, in offering and selling interests in a higher education trust, were to comply with Board rules as they have been proposed to be amended in the March Notice, in lieu of complying with such rules as currently in effect.⁽¹⁵⁾ In another no-action letter, SEC staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action if dealers (1) sold interests in a higher education trust through persons qualified to sell investment company products but who did not meet the Board's professional qualification requirements⁽¹⁶⁾ and (2) complied with Rule 15c2-12(b)(5) through a continuing disclosure undertaking from a dealer affiliate, rather than from the issuer. In reaching this position, SEC staff noted that the higher education trust interests were "atypical municipal securities."⁽¹⁷⁾

        In other instances, SEC staff agreed not to recommend enforcement action if state entities and their employees sold higher education trust interests without registering as brokers.⁽¹⁸⁾ The applicants opined in these cases that the interests were municipal securities under the Exchange Act, thereby exempting the issuers from registering as brokers by virtue of the exemption for issuers of municipal securities set forth in Section 3(d).⁽¹⁹⁾ SEC staff also agreed not to recommend enforcement action if interests in a state trust were not registered under the Exchange Act, in reliance on an opinion that the exemption under Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act for exempted securities was available.⁽²⁰⁾

        SEC staff also has taken the position that non-debt securities may be municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽²¹⁾ In one case, SEC staff was unable to conclude that receipts/certificates evidencing developers' payments to a city of fees for the issuance of building permits could not be considered municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽²²⁾ SEC staff also has advised the Board that warrants sold by a municipal corporation entitling the holders to purchase other municipal securities of that corporation are themselves municipal securities under the Exchange Act.⁽²³⁾ Finally, in those cases in which SEC staff concluded that an "obligation" within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code would also constitute an "obligation" for purposes of Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act, SEC staff did not conclude that the failure of a security to be an obligation for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code would mean that such security was not a municipal security for purposes of the Exchange Act.⁽²⁴⁾ In these cases, SEC staff was not presented with the issue of whether a non-debt security could be a municipal security. As noted above, on the last two occasions when SEC staff was confronted with this issue, it concluded that a non-debt security may be a municipal security for purposes of the Exchange Act.⁽²⁵⁾

        A review of legislative history also suggests that the commentators' position that the term "municipal securities" in the Exchange Act excludes non-debt securities is not justified. The Senate report on the Securities Acts Amendments notes that the legislation created a definition of municipal securities in new Section 3(a)(29) that, for all relevant purposes, used the same language as in the original version of the definition of exempted securities in Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act.⁽²⁶⁾ It also states that no substantive changes in meaning would be effected by creating Section 3(a)(29).⁽²⁷⁾ Thus, the import of the term "municipal securities" must be viewed through the eyes of the original drafters of the Exchange Act in 1934 rather than the drafters of the Securities Acts Amendments in 1975.

        The purpose of including municipal securities in the definition of exempted securities in the Exchange Act was to provide an exemption from most provisions of that Act. Although commentators suggest that Board regulation of dealer transactions in non-debt securities of municipal issuers is inconsistent with the intent of the drafters of the Securities Acts Amendments, the appropriate inquiry is whether the drafters of the original Exchange Act would have intended that only debt securities of municipal issuers be exempted from most provisions of the Exchange Act. That is, would the drafters of the original Exchange Act have intended that non-debt securities of state or local governmental entities - had such securities existed at the time - be subject to the entire range of regulation of the Exchange Act applicable to other equity securities, including in some instances a requirement for registration of such securities with the SEC? A review of Congressional debates, committee reports and hearing testimony relating to enactment of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act reveals that, in spite of differences in statutory language, both Acts were expected to exempt the same universe of municipal securities.

        For example, the 1933 House report on the Securities Act speaks of exempted state and local government securities almost exclusively in terms of "obligations" and "bonds," not "securities."⁽²⁸⁾ The report explains the exemption set forth in Section 3(a) of the Securities Act as follows:

        Paragraph (2) exempts United States, Territorial and State obligations, or obligations of any political subdivision of these governmental units. The term "political subdivision" carries with it the exemption of such securities as county, town, or municipal obligations, as well as school district, drainage district, and levee district, and other similar bonds. The line drawn by the expression "political subdivision" corresponds generally with the line drawn by the courts as to what obligations of States, their units and instrumentalities created by them, are exempted from Federal taxation. By such delineation, any constitutional difficulties that might arise with reference to the inclusion of State and municipal obligations are avoided.⁽²⁹⁾

        Furthermore, during Congressional debate and hearings held in 1933 on the Securities Act, members of Congress used the terms "securities," "obligations" and "bonds" interchangeably.⁽³⁰⁾ Thus, although the statutory language in the Securities Act uses only the term "securities" and not the term "obligations" when describing municipal securities, there is no suggestion that Congress had anything in mind when enacting the Securities Act other than the tax-exempt bonds and other debt obligations of state and local governments that are customarily associated with municipal securities. Nonetheless, the commentators all have agreed that local government pool and higher education trust interests are exempt from the Securities Act and none has suggested that this exemption is limited to tax-exempt debt obligations.

        The initial Exchange Act draft introduced in Congress the following year exempted federal government securities but not municipal securities. Members of Congress expressed concern regarding the appropriateness of federal regulation of state and local governmental matters,⁽³¹⁾ the burden that Exchange Act provisions would place on state and local issuers⁽³²⁾ and the relative detriment in the market to municipal securities if they were not exempted but federal government securities were exempted.⁽³³⁾ Some discussion focused on whether a distinction should be drawn between defaulted and non-defaulted municipal securities.⁽³⁴⁾ Ultimately, the language that was added to the Exchange Act to exempt municipal securities made no such distinction but instead was drafted in non-exclusive terms that paralleled the language used in the Exchange Act to describe federal government securities. This language also employed the same type of terminology that the drafters of the Securities Act had used in the legislative history to explain the statutory language on municipal securities in that Act.⁽³⁵⁾ Legislative history does not reflect any intent or understanding that the municipal securities contemplated in the Exchange Act were any different than those that were already exempted under the Securities Act.⁽³⁶⁾ It would be inconsistent with legislative intent to limit the exemption under the Exchange Act solely to debt securities of state and local governments without similarly limiting the reach of the exemption provided in the Securities Act.

        Finally, in using the same term - "municipal securities" - that sets out the exemption from most Exchange Act provisions to also delineate the Board's rulemaking authority under Section 15B of the Exchange Act, Congress elected in the Securities Acts Amendments to grant the Board jurisdiction over dealer transactions in the identical universe of securities as were otherwise exempted from the Exchange Act as municipal securities. Thus, even if Congress did not have interests in local government pools or higher education trusts in mind when enacting the Securities Acts Amendments, it did have a specific intent that the Board would have authority over dealer transactions in any security that would constitute an exempted security by virtue of being a municipal security. In creating the Board, the Senate report on the Securities Acts Amendments stated that it would not "be desirable to restrict the Board's authority by a specific enumeration of subject matters. The ingenuity of the financial community and the impossibility of anticipating all future circumstances are obvious reasons for allowing the Board a measure of flexibility in laying down the rules for the municipal securities industry."⁽³⁷⁾ The fact that certain types of instruments (such as non-debt securities of state or local governments) were essentially non-existent at the time of enactment of the Securities Acts Amendments did not, in the minds of the drafters, mean that regulations relating to newly created instruments would not be within the Board's power.⁽³⁸⁾

Appropriateness of Regulating Dealer Transactions in Municipal Fund Securities

        Comments Received. Commentators state that, even if the Board has authority to adopt the draft rule changes, the Board should refrain from doing so. They argue that no need has been demonstrated for regulation to protect investors or the public interest in connection with local government pool interests. They state that investors are local governments and not the typical public investor in municipal securities.⁽³⁹⁾ They also argue that offerings of interests in local government pools do not pose risks that are similar to those identified in the legislative history of the Securities Acts Amendments.⁽⁴⁰⁾ One commentator argues that safeguards already exist to provide investor protections comparable to those in the draft rule changes.⁽⁴¹⁾

        Some commentators state that Board rulemaking would adversely impact state and local governments. In particular, they believe that underwriting assessments would be passed on, directly or indirectly, to issuers and issuers would face additional administrative burdens as a result of the application of Board rules. They note that any increased costs to issuers likely would be passed on to investors in the form of lower returns on their investments.

        Commentators also state that interests in local government pools involve transactions between the state or local government-sponsored pools and participating local governmental entities of that same state. One commentator believes that Board rulemaking would be inconsistent with the Tenth Amendment and transactions in local government pool interests do not constitute interstate commerce. Furthermore, noting that the Exchange Act does not require registration of a broker or dealer whose business is exclusively intrastate, this commentator suggests that the Board "follow Congress's restraint in approaching intrastate transactions in securities." Finally, it states that regulation of transactions in these interests would "improperly intrude on state sovereignty" by indirectly regulating states by mandating actions by their agents.

        Board Response. As the Board has previously observed, the current rulemaking proposal would not subject dealer transactions in municipal fund securities to Board rules but instead would make certain Board rules, to which such transactions are already subject, better accommodate the nature of these securities. Making Board rules fit the characteristics of municipal fund securities is an appropriate Board undertaking. Also, Board rules do not govern the actions of issuers; instead, they impose standards on dealers effecting transactions in the securities of such issuers. In establishing the Board, Congress determined that dealer regulation was the appropriate manner of providing investor protection in the municipal securities market while maintaining the existing exemption for issuers.⁽⁴²⁾

        The definition of customer under rule D-9 includes issuers, except in connection with sales of an issuer's new issue municipal securities, and therefore Board rules contemplate that governmental entities acting as investors are entitled to the protections afforded by such rules to all customers.⁽⁴³⁾ The Board understands that local government pools exist in nearly every state and that, in many states, more than one pool may be available to a local government.⁽⁴⁴⁾ One market observer states that these pools "can differ in their level of risk taking, internal oversight, shareholder services, and external reporting."⁽⁴⁵⁾ Although a number of pools have been rated, the vast majority remain unrated. Most local government pools appear to be designed to maintain, as nearly as possible, a constant net asset value (similar to regulated money market mutual funds), but some operate as variable net asset value pools that do not seek to maintain a constant share value. Furthermore, a number of local government pools have experienced financial difficulties.⁽⁴⁶⁾ These factors suggest that investor protection issues may be raised in connection with the sale by dealers of interests in local government pools.⁽⁴⁷⁾ The Board believes that investor protection issues also may arise with respect to sales by dealers of interests in higher education trusts.⁽⁴⁸⁾ For example, the Board believes that dealers have suitability obligations if they recommend a transaction in a local government pool or higher education trust interest to a local government or an individual, respectively, if such interest constitutes a municipal security.⁽⁴⁹⁾

        Commentators describe local government pools as being operated "consistent with" the federal securities laws applicable to investment companies and managed and administered in a manner "similar" to money market mutual funds, "where practicable." These comments imply that many programs in fact deviate to some degree from their voluntary compliance with existing federal regulations that would be applicable to these programs if they were not operated by state or local governmental entities. However, the Board notes that its proposed rulemaking would not impose requirements on issuers and in fact has been drafted with the understanding that dealers may be effecting transactions in securities that are similar, but not identical, to investment company securities. In that respect, the Board believes that its proposed rulemaking is more suitable for dealers effecting transactions in municipal fund securities than existing SEC and NASD rules applicable to dealer transactions in investment company securities since some such rules impose obligations on dealers based on the assumption that issuers, as registered investment companies, must comply with federal investment company laws and regulations. Thus, a dealer might have difficulty in complying with the letter of existing regulations relating to securities of registered investment companies where the issuer of a local government pool or higher education trust interest has chosen not to voluntarily comply with the provisions that would be obligatory if it were a registered investment company. As is the case with all existing Board rules, the current rulemaking proposal recognizes that issuers, as largely unregulated entities, may act in widely divergent manners. Thus, obligations placed on dealers should be sufficiently flexible to permit dealers to act in a lawful manner in view of this wide divergence of circumstances while maintaining an adequate level of customer protection.

        The Board believes that state regulation, federal rules applicable to investment advisors and Governmental Accounting Standards Board statements, although providing important protections in the areas governed by such rules and standards, do not serve as a substitute for regulation tailored specifically toward dealer activities in municipal fund securities. Furthermore, the Board believes that voluntary adherence to the substance of existing rules applicable to investment company securities and/or other equity securities provides inadequate protection to investors since dealers are free to deviate from these rules in any manner and at any time they choose without any apparent legal consequence. The existence of these collateral safeguards do not justify the Board refraining from making its rules more rational with respect to such securities.

        Finally, with regard to the argument that interests in local government pools are strictly intrastate in nature and therefore are not the appropriate subject of federal regulation, Board rules currently do not apply to any entity that, by virtue of the fact that its business is exclusively intrastate, is not registered as a broker or dealer under Section 15 of the Exchange Act. Beyond this, the federal securities laws provide that, once an entity engages in some interstate activities that require it to register under the Exchange Act, the broker-dealer rules applicable to such entity apply to both its interstate and intrastate transactions. We believe that Congress has made clear its policy determination that intrastate transactions of registered broker-dealers should be subject to broker-dealer regulation.⁽⁵⁰⁾

Applicability of Existing Board Rules to Transactions in Municipal Fund Securities Effected Prior to Effectiveness of Draft Rule Changes

        Comments Received. Two commentators argue that, to the extent that the Board may have authority to regulate dealer transactions in these interests, existing Board rules relating to municipal securities do not currently apply to transactions in local government pool interests. They state that existing Board rules were never intended to apply to securities other than debt obligations, as evidenced by the Board's statement in the March Notice that its rules "generally have been drafted to accommodate the characteristics of debt obligations and not investment interests such as municipal fund securities." As a result, they believe that any interpretation by the Board to the effect that existing rules apply to municipal fund securities can only be effected through the rulemaking process.

        Board Response. As stated above, the Board believes that Section 15B(c)(1) of the Exchange Act automatically subjects any dealer transactions in municipal fund securities to Board rules. This is true regardless of whether dealers effecting such transactions are aware that municipal fund securities are, in fact, municipal securities. It is incumbent upon dealers to be aware of the nature of the securities in which they undertake transactions and it is not a defense against the applicability of Board rules that the dealer did not know that the securities were municipal securities. Thus, the Board's statement that any interest in a local government pool or a higher education trust that is a municipal security currently is subject to Board rules was a statement of fact rather than an interpretation.⁽⁵¹⁾

        The Board recognizes, however, that, prior to publication of the March Notice, it may not have been readily apparent to the vast majority of dealers, as well as to most regulatory agencies, that interests that constitute municipal fund securities were municipal securities. Although the Board does not have authority to direct enforcement of its rules, it is statutorily charged with determining the best means of protecting investors and the public interest in regard to dealer transactions in municipal securities. As such, the Board believes that, under the unique circumstances relating to municipal fund securities, enforcement of its rules with regard to transactions in such securities that occurred prior to the industry having been put on notice of their applicability would serve no substantial investor protection purpose, absent extraordinary circumstances or a showing of investor harm resulting from a material departure from standards of fairness generally applicable under the federal securities laws.

Structure of Draft Rule Changes

        Comments Received. Some commentators express concern that the Board's rulemaking proposal contemplates amendments to existing rules rather than creation of a separate body of regulations. One commentator states that the "attempt to fit a totally new product or way of doing business into existing regulation that was created to address fundamentally different products and a different market structure is fraught with danger." Commentators also state that transactions in municipal fund securities should be regulated in a manner as similar as possible to the existing regulatory scheme for investment company securities.

        Board Response. The Board reviewed its existing rules and compared them, where relevant, to rules that govern dealer transactions in securities of registered investment companies. In many respects, Board rules are functionally identical to such existing rules. In other cases, existing SEC or NASD rules provide a more appropriate method of regulating municipal fund securities and the Board sought to modify its rules in a manner that was consistent with such other rules. In yet other cases, the regulation of the structure and marketing of securities of registered investment companies has been effected by regulations applicable to issuers, an approach which the Board cannot, and does not seek to, duplicate. Finally, certain NASD and SEC rule provisions arise out of specific Congressional authorization in the Investment Company Act applicable to securities of registered investment companies but not applicable to unregistered municipal fund securities.

        Under the circumstances, the Board believes that its approach is appropriate. The Board sought industry comment on the draft rule changes and, in those circumstances where commentators noted specific shortcomings, the Board considered the merits of the comments and made revisions where appropriate. The Board was disappointed that several commentators chose to comment almost exclusively on jurisdictional issues and hopes that they will now address the details of, and any concerns raised by, the revised draft rule changes.

Specific Rule Provisions

        Rule A-13, on Underwriting Assessments. In the March Notice, the Board states that sales of municipal fund securities are made in a primary offering subject to the underwriting assessment in rule A-13.⁽⁵²⁾ The draft amendment to rule A-13 would have provided for the imposition of an underwriting assessment with respect to such sales of municipal fund securities.

        Most commentators express concern regarding the assessment of underwriting fees on sales of municipal fund securities. Some suggest that such sales should be exempted from the underwriting assessment. They state that the fee structure for dealers involved in the distribution of municipal fund securities is more like an administrative fee than an underwriting discount or commission since these dealers do not undertake underwriting risks. As a result, they state that fees generally are fixed and are low relative to traditional underwriting fees. Because of these small margins, a number of commentators state that underwriting assessments would be passed on to issuers and therefore would represent a financial burden on the issuers' programs.⁽⁵³⁾

        Some commentators state that, given the volume of investments and redemptions in many municipal fund securities programs,⁽⁵⁴⁾ the level of fees generated by the Board from underwriting assessments would be disproportionate to the resulting regulatory costs. One commentator states that, if assessments are imposed, they should be at a significantly lower level than the assessments charged in connection with more traditional municipal securities offerings.⁽⁵⁵⁾

        Based on the comments, the Board has revised the draft amendment to rule A-13 to exempt sales of municipal fund securities from the underwriting assessment. The continuous nature of offerings in municipal fund securities, the programmatic nature of most customer investments and the heightened potential that underwriting assessments could create significant financial burdens on issuers to their customers' detriment justify caution in imposing the underwriting assessment. The Board also wishes to make clear that it does not intend to seek payment of any previously accrued underwriting assessments that may technically be due and owing on prior sales of municipal fund securities.

        Draft Rule D-12, on Definition of "Municipal Fund Security". Draft rule D-12 defines municipal fund security as a municipal security that would be an investment company security under the Investment Company Act but for the fact that the issuer is a state or local governmental entity or instrumentality. For a security to constitute a municipal fund security, the security must first constitute a municipal security. The draft amendments would not apply to any local government pool or higher education trust interest that is not a municipal security. The Board has not revised the draft definition.⁽⁵⁶⁾

        Rule G-3, on Professional Qualifications. The draft amendment to rule G-3 would permit an associated person qualified as an investment company limited representative to effect transactions in municipal fund securities (but no other municipal securities).⁽⁵⁷⁾ A dealer must have municipal securities principals as required under rule G-3(b), even if the dealer's only municipal securities transactions are sales of municipal fund securities. The Board has not revised this draft amendment.⁽⁵⁸⁾

        Rule G-8, on Recordkeeping. The draft amendment to rule G-8 would recognize that municipal fund securities do not have par values, dollar prices, yields and accrued interest and that some investment company limited representatives would be permitted to effect transactions in municipal fund securities. The Board did not receive comments on its draft amendment to rule G-8. However, in conjunction with revisions to the draft amendment to rule G-15 described below, the Board is proposing an additional revision to rule G-8 to require that dealers retain copies of all periodic statements delivered to customers in lieu of individual confirmations.

        Rule G-14, on Transaction Reporting. The draft rule change would make a technical modification in rule G-14(b)(i) to make clear that certain types of municipal securities transactions may be excluded from transaction reporting as provided in the Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures. In the Procedures, the language change would expressly exempt any transaction in municipal fund securities from the customer transaction reporting system.⁽⁵⁹⁾ The Board did not receive comments on, and has not revised, these draft amendments.

        Rule G-15, on Customer Confirmations. The draft amendment to rule G-15 would effect changes relating to the concepts of par value, yield, dollar price, maturity date and interest, none of which would appropriately apply to a municipal fund security. Thus, on a confirmation of a municipal fund securities transaction, a dealer would use the purchase or sale price of the securities (as appropriate) rather than par value and would omit yield, dollar price, accrued interest, extended principal, maturity date and interest rate. Dealers selling municipal fund securities would be required to include the denomination or purchase price of each share or unit as well as the number of shares or units to be delivered. Confirmations of municipal fund securities transactions would require a disclosure to the effect that a deferred commission or other charge may be imposed upon redemption, if applicable.⁽⁶⁰⁾ The amendment also would make clear that dealers must confirm redemptions of municipal fund securities. Finally, the amendment would permit dealers to use quarterly statements, rather than transaction-by-transaction confirmations, if customers are purchasing such securities in an agreed amount on a periodic basis, in a manner similar to the periodic reporting provision under Exchange Act Rule 10b-10.

The Board received a number of technical comments on various provisions in rule G-15:⁽⁶¹⁾

        Periodic Statements - Rule G-15(a)(vi)(G) and (a)(viii) - Some commentators state that the draft amendments would require individual confirmations for each transaction in local government pool interests and suggest that dealers be permitted to use monthly statements.⁽⁶²⁾ Another commentator states that transactions in higher education trust interests that are not effected pursuant to a periodic plan should nonetheless qualify for periodic statements in lieu of individual transaction confirmations.⁽⁶³⁾

        The Board has decided to revise the draft amendment to rule G-15 to provide that information regarding transactions in municipal fund securities effected in connection with a program that does not provide for periodic purchases or redemptions of municipal fund securities may be disclosed to customers on a monthly statement in lieu of transaction confirmations.⁽⁶⁴⁾ With respect to natural persons who participate in a non-periodic program, this monthly reporting would require the written consent of such individual or of the issuer. If the issuer directs that monthly statements be used in lieu of transaction confirmations, the revised draft amendment to rule G-15(a)(viii) would permit dealers effecting transactions in such municipal fund securities to use monthly statements without obtaining the consent of any customers. In addition, the draft amendment has been revised to eliminate the requirement that customers participating in a group plan consent to the use of periodic statements in lieu of transaction confirmations.⁽⁶⁵⁾

        Rule G-15(a)(i)(A)(7) - In order to avoid the potential for ambiguity, this subparagraph has been revised to eliminate reference to denomination and to refer solely to the share purchase price.⁽⁶⁶⁾

        Rule G-15(a)(i)(C) and (a)(i)(B)(1) - A commentator notes that the Board did not provide guidance regarding the securities descriptive information required to be included under paragraph (a)(i)(C) and states that such paragraph should not be applicable to municipal fund securities. In the alternative, it suggests that confirmations should not be required to state that municipal fund securities are unrated.⁽⁶⁷⁾ The Board has revised the draft amendment to (i) provide that a confirmation of a municipal fund security transaction need not show the information required under paragraph (a)(i)(C) other than whether the security is puttable and (ii) include a requirement in subparagraph (a)(i)(B)(1) that the confirmation include the name used by the issuer to identify the security and, to the extent necessary to differentiate the security from other municipal fund securities of the issuer, any separate program series, portfolio or fund designation. A statement to the effect that the security is unrated would not be required.

        Rule G-21, on Advertising. The Board did not propose amending rule G-21 in the March Notice. One commentator states that this rule should be revised to eliminate references to price and yield for purposes of municipal fund securities. Section (d)(i) provides that an advertisement for new issue municipal securities may show the initial reoffering price or yield, even if they have changed, so long as the date of sale is shown. In addition, it provides that if the price or yield shown in the advertisement is other than the initial price or yield, the price or yield shown must have been accurate at the time the advertisement was submitted for publication. The Board believes that these provisions do not unnecessarily restrict the manner in which municipal fund securities may be advertised nor do they mandate that an advertisement for a municipal fund security specify a price or yield.⁽⁶⁸⁾ Therefore, no change has been proposed to rule G-21.

        Rule G-26, on Customer Account Transfers. The draft amendment to rule G-26 amends the definition of "nontransferable asset" to reflect the fact that the issuer of municipal fund securities may limit which dealers may carry accounts for customers in such securities. The Board did not receive comments on, and has not revised, this draft amendment.

        Rule G-32, on New Issue Disclosures. No amendments to rule G-32 were proposed in the March Notice. However, the Board stated that municipal fund securities sold in a primary offering would constitute new issue municipal securities for purposes of rule G-32 so long as the securities are in the underwriting period. Since the Board understands that issuers of municipal fund securities are continuously issuing and delivering the securities as customers make purchases, the Board believes that municipal fund securities would remain in their underwriting period so long as such issuance and delivery continues.⁽⁶⁹⁾ Thus, a dealer effecting a transaction in a municipal fund security would be required to deliver to the customer the official statement, if one exists, by settlement of the transaction. However, in the case of a customer purchasing such securities who is a repeat purchaser, no new delivery of the official statement would be required so long as the customer has previously received it in connection with a prior purchase and the official statement has not been changed from the one previously delivered to that customer.⁽⁷⁰⁾

        One commentator expresses concern regarding the timing requirement of rule G-32 in the limited circumstances where a revision has just been made to the official statement and a customer that participates in a periodic plan makes an automatic purchase of additional shares of municipal fund securities. In spite of the best efforts of the dealer and the issuer, it may be impossible for the revised official statement to be delivered to the customer by settlement. The commentator suggests that, under these circumstances, the timing requirement under rule G-32 should be based on the sending rather than the delivery of the official statement.

        The Board is proposing a draft amendment to rule G-32 that would permit a dealer to sell, pursuant to a periodic plan, a municipal fund security to a customer who has previously received the official statement so long as it sends to the customer a copy of any new, supplemented, amended or stickered official statement promptly upon receipt from the issuer. The draft amendment also would except municipal fund securities for which periodic statements in lieu of transaction confirmations are provided from the requirement that information on the underwriting arrangements (which information would be limited to the fees paid to the dealer by the issuer) be provided to customers by settlement so long as such information is disclosed at least annually and information on any fee changes paid by the issuer to the dealer be sent to customers simultaneously with or prior to the sending of the next periodic statement.

        Rule G-33, on Calculations. The Board did not propose amending rule G-33 in the March Notice. One commentator states that this rule should be revised to eliminate references to par value, yield dollar price, maturity date and interest for purposes of municipal fund securities. By its terms, rule G-33 applies only to municipal securities that bear interest or are sold at a discount. Since municipal fund securities do not bear interest and are not sold at a discount, rule G-33 would by its nature not apply. Therefore, no change has been made to rule G-33.

        Rule G-34, on CUSIP Numbers and Depository Eligibility. The draft amendments would exempt municipal fund securities from the requirements of rule G-34 since no secondary market is expected to develop.⁽⁷¹⁾ The Board did not receive comments on, and has not revised, this draft amendment.

        Rule G-36, on Delivery of Official Statements and Form G-36(OS) to the Board. The Board did not propose amending rule G-36 in the March Notice but did state that, consistent with SEC staff's view regarding the sale in primary offerings of municipal fund securities, dealers acting as underwriters in primary offerings of municipal fund securities would be subject to the requirements of rule G-36. Thus, unless such primary offering falls within one of the stated exemptions in Rule 15c2-12, the Board expects that the dealer would receive a final official statement from the issuer or its agent under its contractual agreement entered into pursuant to Rule 15c2-12(b)(3). Such official statement should be received from the issuer in sufficient time for the dealer to send the official statement, together with Form G-36(OS), to the Board within one business day of receipt but no later than 10 business days after any final agreement to purchase, offer, or sell the municipal fund securities.⁽⁷²⁾ Since municipal fund securities remain in their underwriting period so long as they continue to be sold and delivered, the dealer would remain obligated under rule G-36(d) to send to the Board, within one business day of receipt, any amendments made to the official statement during such extended underwriting period.⁽⁷³⁾ No change has been made to rule G-36.

        Rule G-37, on Political Contributions and Prohibitions on Municipal Securities Business, and Rule G-38, on Consultants. The Board did not propose amending rules G-37 and G-38 in the March Notice but did reminded dealers that the definition of municipal securities business under such rules includes the purchase of a primary offering from the issuer on other than a competitive bid basis or the offer or sale of a primary offering on behalf of any issuer. Thus, a dealer's transactions in municipal fund securities may impact upon such dealer's obligations under rules G-37 and G-38. No changes have been made to rules G-37 and G-38.

* * * * *

Comments from all interested parties are welcome. Comments should be submitted no later than November 1, 1999, and may be directed to Ernesto A. Lanza, Associate General Counsel. Written comments will be available for public inspection.

August 27, 1999

 

TEXT OF DRAFT AMENDMENTS⁽⁷⁴⁾

Rule A-13. Underwriting and Transaction Assessments for Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) Underwriting Assessments - Scope. Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall pay to the Board an underwriting fee as set forth in section (b) for all municipal securities purchased from an issuer by or through such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, whether acting as principal or agent, as part of a primary offering, provided that section (b) of this rule shall not apply to a primary offering of securities if all such securities in the primary offering:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) at the option of the holder thereof, may be tendered to an issuer of such securities or its designated agent for redemption or purchase at par value or more at least as frequently as every nine months until maturity, earlier redemption, or purchase by an issuer or its designated agent; or

        (iv) have authorized denominations of $100,000 or more and are sold to no more than thirty-five persons each of whom the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer reasonably believes: (A) has the knowledge and experience necessary to evaluate the merits and risks of the investment; and (B) is not purchasing for more than one account, with a view toward distributing the securities; or

        (v) constitute municipal fund securities.

If a syndicate or similar account has been formed for the purchase of the securities, the underwriting fee shall be paid by the managing underwriter on behalf of each participant in the syndicate or similar account.

(b)-(f) No change.

Rule D-12. "Municipal Fund Security"

The term "municipal fund security" shall mean a municipal security issued by an issuer that, but for the application of Section 2(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, would constitute an investment company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Rule G-3. Classification of Principals and Representatives; Numerical Requirements; Testing; Continuing Education Requirements

No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or person who is a municipal securities representative, municipal securities principal, municipal securities sales principal or financial and operations principal (as hereafter defined) shall be qualified for purposes of rule G-2 unless such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or person meets the requirements of this rule.

(a) Municipal Securities Representative.

        (i) No change.

        (ii) Qualification Requirements.

        (A)-(B) No change.

        (C) The requirements of subparagraph (a)(ii)(A) of this rule shall not apply to any person who is duly qualified as a limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products by reason of having taken and passed the Limited Representative - Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Examination, but only if such person's activities with respect to municipal securities described in paragraph (a)(i) of this rule are limited solely to municipal fund securities.

        (D) Any person who ceases to be associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer (whether as a municipal securities representative or otherwise) for two or more years at any time after having qualified as a municipal securities representative in accordance with subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) shall again meet the requirements of subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) prior to being qualified as a municipal securities representative.

        (iii) Apprenticeship.

        (A) Any person who first becomes associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in a representative capacity (whether as a municipal securities representative, or general securities representative or limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products) without having previously qualified as a municipal securities representative, or general securities representative or limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products shall be permitted to function in a representative capacity without qualifying pursuant to subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) for a period of at least 90 days following the date such person becomes associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, provided, however, that such person shall not transact business with any member of the public with respect to, or be compensated for transactions in, municipal securities during such 90 day period, regardless of such person's having qualified in accordance with the examination requirements of this rule. A person subject to the requirements of this paragraph (a)(iii) shall in no event continue to perform any of the functions of a municipal securities representative after 180 days following the commencement of such person's association with such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, unless such person qualifies as a municipal securities representative pursuant to subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B).

        (B) Prior experience, of at least 90 days, as a general securities representative, limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products mutual fund salesperson or limited representative - government securities representative, will meet the requirements of this paragraph (a)(iii).

(b)-(h) No change.

Rule G-8. Books and Records to be Made by Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) Description of Books and Records Required to be Made. Except as otherwise specifically indicated in this rule, every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall make and keep current the following books and records, to the extent applicable to the business of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (i) Records of Original Entry. "Blotters" or other records of original entry containing an itemized daily record of all purchases and sales of municipal securities, all receipts and deliveries of municipal securities (including certificate numbers and, if the securities are in registered form, an indication to such effect), all receipts and disbursement of cash with respect to transactions in municipal securities, all other debits and credits pertaining to transactions in municipal securities, and in the case of brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers, all other cash receipts and disbursements if not contained in the records required by any other provision of this rule. The records of original entry shall show the name or other designation of the account for which each such transaction was effected (whether effected for the account of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, the account of a customer, or otherwise), the description of the securities, the aggregate par value of the securities, the dollar price or yield and aggregate purchase or sale price of the securities, accrued interest, the trade date, and the name or other designation of the person from whom purchased or received or to whom sold or delivered. With respect to accrued interest and information relating to "when issued" transactions which may not be available at the time a transaction is effected, entries setting forth such information shall be made promptly as such information becomes available. Dollar price, yield and accrued interest relating to any transaction shall be required to be shown only to the extent required to be included in the confirmation delivered by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in connection with such transaction under rule G-12 or rule G-15.

        (ii)-(viii) No change.

        (ix) Copies of Confirmations, Periodic Statements and Certain Other Notices to Customers. A copy of all confirmations of purchase or sale of municipal securities, of all periodic written statements disclosing purchases, sales or redemptions of municipal fund securities pursuant to rule G-15(a)(viii) and, in the case of a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer other than a bank dealer, of all other notices sent to customers concerning debits and credits to customer accounts or, in the case of a bank dealer, notices of debits and credits for municipal securities, cash and other items with respect to transactions in municipal securities.

        (x) No change.

        (xi) Customer Account Information. A record for each customer, other than an institutional account, setting forth the following information to the extent applicable to such customer:

        (A)-(G) No change.

        (H) signature of municipal securities representative, and general securities representative or limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products introducing the account and signature of a municipal securities principal, municipal securities sales principal or general securities principal indicating acceptance of the account;

        (I)-(K) No change.

For purposes of this subparagraph, the terms "general securities representative," and "general securities principal" and "limited representative - investment company and variable contracts products" shall mean such persons as so defined by the rules of a national securities exchange or registered securities association. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "institutional account" shall mean the account of (i) a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or registered investment company; (ii) an investment adviser registered either with the Commission under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or with a state securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions); or (iii) any other entity (whether a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust, or otherwise) with total assets of at least $50 million. Anything in this subparagraph to the contrary notwithstanding, every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall maintain a record of the information required by items (A), (C), (F), (H), (I) and (K) of this subparagraph with respect to each customer which is an institutional account.

        (xii)-(xix) No change.

(b)-(f) No change.

(g) Price substituted for par value of municipal fund securities. For purposes of this rule, each reference to the term "par value," when applied to a municipal fund security, shall be substituted with (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

Rule G-14. Reports of Sales or Purchases

(a) No change.

(b) Transactions Reporting Requirements.

        (i) Each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall report to the Board or its designee information about its transactions in municipal securities to the extent required by, and using the formats and within the timeframes specified in, Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures. Transaction information collected by the Board under this rule will be used to make public reports of market activity and prices and to assess transaction fees. The transaction information will be made available by the Board to the Commission, securities associations registered under Section 15A of the Act and other appropriate regulatory agencies defined in Section 3(a)(34)(A) of the Act to assist in the inspection for compliance with and the enforcement of Board rules.

        (ii)-(iii) No change.

Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures

(a) No change.

(b) Customer Transactions.

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) The following transactions shall not be required to be reported under this section (b):

        (A) A a transaction in a municipal security that is ineligible for assignment of a CUSIP number by the Board or its designee; and shall not be required to be reported under this section (b).

        (B) a transaction in a municipal fund security.

        (iv) No change.

Rule G-15. Confirmation, Clearance and Settlement of Transactions with Customers

(a) Customer Confirmations

        (i) At or before the completion of a transaction in municipal securities with or for the account of a customer, each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall give or send to the customer a written confirmation that complies with the requirements of this paragraph (i):

        (A) Transaction information. The confirmation shall include information regarding the terms of the transaction as set forth in this subparagraph (A):

        (1)-(2) No change.

        (3) Par value. The par value of the securities shall be shown, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) No change.

        (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, in place of par value, the confirmation shall show (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the total purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the total sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

        (4) No change.

        (5) Yield and dollar price. Yields and dollar prices shall be computed and shown in the following manner, subject to the exceptions stated in subparagraph (A)(5)(d) of this paragraph:

        (a)-(c) No change.

        (d) Notwithstanding the requirements noted in subparagraphs (A)(5)(a) through (c) of this paragraph, above:

        (i)-(v) No change.

        (vi) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, neither yield nor dollar price shall be shown.

        (6) Final Monies. The following information relating to the calculation and display of final monies shall be shown:

        (a) No change.

        (b) amount of accrued interest, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no figure for accrued interest shall be shown;

        (c) if the securities pay interest on a current basis but are traded without interest, a notation of "flat;"

        (d) extended principal amount, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (i) No change.

        (ii) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no extended principal amount shall be shown;

        (e)-(h) No change.

        (7) Delivery of securities. The following information regarding the delivery of securities shall be shown:

        (a) Securities other than bonds or municipal fund securities. For securities other than bonds or municipal fund securities, denominations to be delivered;

        (b) No change.

        (c) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, the purchase price, exclusive of commission, of each share or unit and the number of shares or units to be delivered;

        (d) Delivery instructions. Instructions, if available, regarding receipt or delivery of securities, and form of payment, if other than as usual and customary between the parties.

        (8) No change.

        (B) Securities identification information. The confirmation shall include a securities identification which includes, at a minimum:

        (1) the name of the issuer, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) For stripped coupon securities, the trade name and series designation assigned to the stripped coupon municipal security by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer sponsoring the program must be shown;

        (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, the name used by the issuer to identify such securities and, to the extent necessary to differentiate the securities from other municipal fund securities of the issuer, any separate program series, portfolio or fund designation for such securities must be shown;

        (2) No change.

        (3) maturity date, if any, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) No change.

        (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no maturity date shall be shown;

        (4) interest rate, if any, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a)-(e) No change.

        (f) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no interest rate shall be shown;

        (C) Securities descriptive information. The confirmation shall include descriptive information about the securities which includes, at a minimum:

        (1)-(4) No change.

        (5) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, the information described in clauses (1) through (4) of this subparagraph (C) is not required to be shown; provided, however, that if the municipal fund securities are puttable or otherwise redeemable by the customer, the confirmation shall include a designation to that effect.

        (D) Disclosure statements:

        (1)-(2) No change.

        (3) The confirmation for securities for which a deferred commission or other charge is imposed upon redemption or as a condition for payment of principal or interest thereon shall include a statement that the customer may be required to make a payment of such deferred commission or other charge upon redemption of such securities or as a condition for payment of principal or interest thereon, as appropriate, and that information concerning such deferred commission or other charge will be furnished upon written request.

        (ii)-(iii) No change.

        (iv) Confirmation to customers who tender put option bonds or municipal fund securities. A broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer that has an interest in put option bonds (including acting as remarketing agent) and accepts for tender put option bonds from a customer, or that has an interest in municipal fund securities (including acting as agent for the issuer thereof) and accepts for redemption municipal fund securities tendered by a customer, is engaging in a transaction in such municipal securities and shall send a confirmation under paragraph (i) of this section.

        (v) No change.

        (vi) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

        (A)-(F) No change.

        (G) The term "periodic municipal fund security plan" shall mean any written authorization or arrangement for a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, acting as agent, to purchase, sell or redeem for a customer or group of customers one or more specific municipal fund securities, in specific amounts (calculated in security units or dollars), at specific time intervals and setting forth the commissions or charges to be paid by the customer in connection therewith (or the manner of calculating them).

        (H) The term "non-periodic municipal fund security program" shall mean any written authorization or arrangement for a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, acting as agent, to purchase, sell or redeem for a customer or group of customers one or more specific municipal fund securities, setting forth the commissions or charges to be paid by the customer in connection therewith (or the manner of calculating them) and either (1) providing for the purchase, sale or redemption of such municipal fund securities at the direction of the customer or customers or (2) providing for the purchase, sale or redemption of such municipal fund securities at the direction of the customer or customers as well as authorizing the purchase, sale or redemption of such municipal fund securities in specific amounts (calculated in security units or dollars) at specific time intervals.

        (vii) Price substituted for par value of municipal fund securities. For purposes of this rule, each reference to the term "par value," when applied to a municipal fund security, shall be substituted with (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

        (viii) Alternative periodic reporting for certain transactions in municipal fund securities. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section (a), a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may effect transactions in municipal fund securities with customers without giving or sending to such customer the written confirmation required by paragraph (i) of this section (a) at or before completion of each such transaction if:

        (A) such transactions are effected pursuant to a periodic municipal fund security plan or a non-periodic municipal fund security program; and

        (B) such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer gives or sends to such customer within five business days after the end of each quarterly period, in the case of a customer participating in a periodic municipal fund security plan, or each monthly period, in the case of a customer participating in a non-periodic municipal fund security program, a written statement disclosing, for each purchase, sale or redemption effected for or with, and each payment of investment earnings credited to or reinvested for, the account of such customer during the reporting period, the information required to be disclosed to customers pursuant to subparagraphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (i) of this section (a), with the information regarding each transaction clearly segregated; provided that it is permissible for the name and address of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and the customer to appear once at the beginning of the document; and

        (C) in the case of a periodic municipal fund security plan that consists of an arrangement involving a group of two or more customers and contemplating periodic purchases of municipal fund securities by each customer through a person designated by the group, such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (1) gives or sends to the designated person, at or before the completion of the transaction for the purchase of such municipal fund securities, a written notification of the receipt of the total amount paid by the group;

        (2) sends to anyone in the group who was a customer in the prior quarter and on whose behalf payment has not been received in the current quarter a quarterly written statement reflecting that a payment was not received on such customer's behalf; and

        (3) advises each customer in the group if a payment is not received from the designated person on behalf of the group within 10 days of a date certain specified in the arrangement for delivery of that payment by the designated person and either (a) thereafter sends to each customer the written confirmation described in paragraph (i) of this section (a) for the next three succeeding payments, or (b) includes in the quarterly statement referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) each date certain specified in the arrangement for delivery of a payment by the designated person and each date on which a payment received from the designated person is applied to the purchase of municipal fund securities;

        (D) such customer is provided with prior notification in writing disclosing the intention to send the written information referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) on a periodic basis in lieu of an immediate confirmation for each transaction; and

        (E) such customer has consented in writing to receipt of the written information referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) on a periodic basis in lieu of an immediate confirmation for each transaction; provided, however, that such customer consent shall not be required if (1) the customer participates in a periodic municipal fund security plan described in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph (viii), (2) the customer is not a natural person and participates in a non-periodic municipal fund security program or (3) the customer is a natural person that participates in a non-periodic municipal fund security program and the issuer has consented in writing to the use by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer of the periodic written information referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) in lieu of an immediate confirmation for each transaction with each customer participating in the non-periodic municipal fund security program.

(b)-(e) No change.

Rule G-26. Customer Account Transfers

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms have the following meanings:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) The term "nontransferable asset" means an asset that is incapable of being transferred from the carrying party to the receiving party because (A) it is an issue in default for which the carrying party does not possess the proper denominations to effect delivery and no transfer agent is available to re-register the securities, or (B) it is a municipal fund security which the issuer requires to be held in an account carried by one or more specified brokers, dealers or municipal securities dealers that does not include the receiving party.

(b) No change.

(c) Transfer Instructions.

        (i) No change.

        (ii) If an account includes any nontransferable assets, the carrying party must request, in writing and prior to or at the time of validation of the transfer instruction, further instructions from the customer with respect to the disposition of such assets. Such request shall provide the customer with the following alternative methods of disposition of nontransferable assets, if applicable:

        (A) No change.

        (B) retention by the carrying party for the customer's benefit; or

        (C) in the case of a nontransferable asset described in section (a)(iii)(B), transfer to another broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, if any, which the issuer has specified as being permitted to carry such asset.

(d)-(i) No change.

Rule G-32. Disclosures in Connection with New Issues

(a) Customer Disclosure Requirements. No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall sell, whether as principal or agent, any new issue municipal securities to a customer unless such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer delivers to the customer no later than the settlement of the transaction:

        (i) a copy of the official statement in final form prepared by or on behalf of the issuer or, if an official statement in final form is not being prepared by or on behalf of the issuer, a written notice to that effect together with a copy of an official statement in preliminary form, if any; provided, however, that:

        (A) if a customer who participates in a periodic municipal fund security plan has previously received a copy of the official statement in final form in connection with the purchase of municipal fund securities under such plan, a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may sell additional shares or units of the municipal fund securities under such plan to the customer if such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer sends to the customer a copy of any new, supplemented, amended or "stickered" official statement in final form, by first class mail or other equally prompt means, promptly upon receipt thereof; or

        (B) if an official statement in final form is being prepared for new issue municipal securities issued in a primary offering that qualifies for the exemption set forth in paragraph (iii) of section (d)(1) of Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12, a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may sell such new issue municipal securities to a customer if such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (A)-(B) Renumbered as (1)-(2).

        (ii) in connection with a negotiated sale of new issue municipal securities, the following information concerning the underwriting arrangements:

        (A) the underwriting spread, if any;

        (B) the amount of any fee received by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer as agent for the issuer in the distribution of the securities; provided, however, that if a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer selling municipal fund securities provides periodic statements to the customer pursuant to rule G-15(a)(viii) in lieu of individual transaction confirmations, this paragraph (ii)(B) shall be deemed to be satisfied if the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer provides this information to the customer at least annually and provides information regarding any change in such fee on or prior to the sending of the next succeeding periodic statement to the customer; and

        (C) except with respect to an issue of municipal fund securities, the initial offering price for each maturity in the issue that is offered or to be offered in whole or in part by the underwriters, including maturities that are not reoffered.

(b) Inter-Dealer Disclosure Requirements. Every broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall send, upon request, the documents and information referred to in this section (a) to any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to which it sells new issue municipal securities no later than the business day following the request or, if an official statement in final form is being prepared but has not been received from the issuer or its agent, no later than the business day following such receipt. Such items shall be sent by first call mail or other equally prompt means, unless the purchasing broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer arranges some other method of delivery and pays or agrees to pay for such delivery.

(b)-(c) Relettered as (c)-(d).

Rule G-34. CUSIP Numbers and New Issue Requirements

(a)-(b) No change.

(c) CUSIP Number Eligibility Exemptions. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to an issue of municipal securities (or for the purpose of section (b) any part of an outstanding maturity of an issue) which (i) does not meet the eligibility criteria for CUSIP number assignment or (ii) consists entirely of municipal fund securities.

 

---

ENDNOTES

1. See "Municipal Fund Securities," MSRB Reports, Vol. 19, No. 2 (April 1999) at 9.

2. The Board understands that local government pools are established by state or local governmental entities as trusts that serve as vehicles for the pooled investment of public moneys of participating governmental entities. Participants purchase interests in the trust and trust assets are invested in a manner consistent with the trust's stated investment objectives. Investors generally do not have a right to control investment of trust assets. See generally National Association of State Treasurers ("NAST"), Special Report: Local Government Investment Pools (July 1995) (the "NAST Report"); Standard & Poor's Fund Services, Local Government Investment Pools (May 1999) (the "S&P Report").

3. The Board understands that higher education trusts generally are established by states under section 529(b) of the Internal Revenue Code as "qualified state tuition programs" through which individuals make investments for the purpose of accumulating savings for qualifying higher education costs of beneficiaries. Individuals purchase interests in the trust and trust assets are invested in a manner consistent with the trust's stated investment objectives. Investors do not have a right to control investment of trust assets. See generally College Savings Plans Network, Special Report on State and College Savings Plans (1998) (the "CSPN Report").

4. Letter dated February 26, 1999 from Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, SEC, to Diane G. Klinke, General Counsel of the Board, in response to letter dated June 2, 1998 from Diane G. Klinke to Catherine McGuire, published as Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 032299033 (Feb. 26, 1999) (the "SEC Letter").

5. Dealers also should consider the applicability of Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12. SEC staff has stated:

[W]e note that Rule 15c2-12(f)(7) under the Exchange Act defines a "primary offering" as including an offering of municipal securities directly or indirectly by or on behalf of an issuer of such securities. Based upon an analysis of programs that have been brought to our attention, it appears that interests in local government pools or higher education trusts generally are offered only by direct purchase from the issuer. Accordingly, we would view those interests as having been sold in a "primary offering" as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. If a dealer is acting as an "underwriter" (as defined in Rule 15c2-12(f)(8)) in connection with that primary offering, the dealer may be subject to the requirements of Rule 15c2-12.

SEC Letter, supra note 4. Questions on Rule 15c2-12 should be directed to SEC staff.

6. See "Transactions in Municipal Collateralized Mortgage Obligations: Rule G-15," MSRB Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1 (April 1992) at 21; "Stripped Coupon Municipal Securities," MSRB Reports, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March 1989) at 3; "Taxable Securities," MSRB Reports, Vol. 6, No. 5 (Oct. 1986) at 5; "Tender Option Programs: SEC Response to Board Letter," MSRB Reports, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Feb. 1985) at 3; "Tax-Exempt Notes: Notice Concerning Application of Board Rules to Such Notes and of Filing of Rule Change," MSRB Reports, Vol. 2, No. 7 (Oct./Nov. 1982) at 17; "Application of Board's Rules to Municipal Commercial Paper," MSRB Reports, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jan. 1982) at 9 (the "CP Notice"); "Application of Board's Rules to Participation Interests in Municipal Tax-Exempt Financing Arrangements," MSRB Reports, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Jan. 1982) at 13; "Notice Concerning Application of Board's Rules to MAC Warrants," [1977-1987 Transfer Binder] MSRB Manual (CCH) � 10,171 (Jan. 22, 1981) (the "Warrant Notice").

7. Section 2(b) provides that the Investment Company Act shall not apply to a state, or any political subdivision of a state, or any agency, authority, or instrumentality thereof.

8. As noted in the March Notice, the definition of municipal fund security is not limited to local government pool or higher education trust interests that are municipal securities but also would apply to any municipal security of an issuer that, but for the identity of the issuer as a state or local governmental entity, would constitute an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

9. Municipal fund securities generally provide investment return and are valued based on the investment performance of an underlying pool of assets having an aggregate value that may increase or decrease from day to day, rather than providing interest payments at a stated rate or discount, as is the case for more traditional municipal securities. In addition, unlike traditional municipal securities, these interests do not have stated par values or maturity dates and cannot be priced based on yield or dollar price. See generally NAST Report, supra note 2; S&P Report, supra note 2; CSPN Report, supra note 3.

10. A commentator states that, although the Board has no authority to regulate either local government pool or higher education trust interests, it believes that interested parties would not resist "appropriate regulation" of higher education trust interests. It states that regulation of transactions in such interests is "arguably both more important and less controversial" than regulation of local government pool interests, noting that higher education trust interests "clearly affect public investors and the public interest."

11. Commentators observe that municipal securities are defined in Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act as "securities which are direct obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal or interest by, a State or any political subdivision thereof," in contrast to the language used in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 regarding any "security issued or guaranteed � by any State of the United States, or by any political subdivision of a State or Territory." They quote a Senate report statement on the Securities Acts Amendments that "'municipal securities' refers to debt obligations of state and local government issuers." Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, S.Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 38 (1975) (the "1975 Senate Report"); but cf. Securities Acts Amendments of 1975, H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 229, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 101 (1975) (the "1975 Conference Report") (amendments "provide a comprehensive pattern for the registration and regulation of securities firms and banks which underwrite and trade securities issued by States and municipalities") (emphasis added). They note references in SEC no-action letters to obligations under the Internal Revenue Code to support their position that municipal securities are limited to debt obligations. See Itel Corp., SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 100581018 (Oct. 1, 1981) (the "Itel Letter"); Bedford-Watt Enterprises, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 062678019 (June 9, 1978) (the "Bedford-Watt Letter"). In addition, an SEC no-action letter is cited to suggest that an equity security may not be a municipal security. See City Employees' Retirement System of the City of Los Angeles, SEC No-Action Letter, [1977-1978 Dec.] Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) � 81,194 (May 12, 1977) (the "CERS Letter").

12. Thus, non-dealer firms may act as investment advisers to local government pool or higher education trust programs and not become subject to Board rules.

13. SEC Letter, supra note 4.

14. See, e.g., Maine College Savings Program Fund, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 080999001 (Aug. 2, 1999) (the "Maine Letter");Teachers Personal Investors Services, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 092898006 (Sept. 10, 1998) (the "TPIS Letter"); New Hampshire Higher Education Savings Plan Trust, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 070698010 (June 30, 1998) (the "New Hampshire Letter"); Public Employees Retirement Board of the State of Oregon, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 041398009 (March 3, 1998) (the "Oregon Letter"); North Carolina State Education Assistance Authority, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 032497016 (March 24, 1997) (the "North Carolina Letter"); Missouri Family Trust Fund, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 101392001 (Sept. 22, 1992) (the "Missouri Letter").

15. Maine Letter, supra note 14. SEC staff's position was conditioned on the dealer complying with all existing Board rules, other than those proposed to be amended in the March Notice, and complying with all Board rules upon completion of the current Board rulemaking process. Counsel had opined that the interests were direct obligations of an instrumentality of a state and therefore were municipal securities within the meaning of Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act. See id. and accompanying letter of inquiry.

16. TPIS Letter, supra note 14. SEC staff stated that this no-action position expires six months after rule G-3 is amended to establish qualification requirements for persons selling such interests.

17. Id. Counsel had opined that the interests were direct obligations of an instrumentality of a state and, therefore, were municipal securities under the Exchange Act. See id. and accompanying letter of inquiry. See also New York State College Choice Tuition Savings Trust, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 091498008 (Sept. 10, 1998) and accompanying letter of inquiry.

18. See, e.g., Maine Letter, supra note 14; New Hampshire Letter, supra note 14; North Carolina Letter, supra note 14.

19. See Maine Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry; New Hampshire Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry; North Carolina Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry. See also Missouri Letter, supra note 14, and accompanying letter of inquiry.

20. See Oregon Letter, supra note 14. Counsel opined that the interests would be exempt from the registration requirements of the Exchange Act as securities issued by a state instrumentality. See id. and accompanying letter of inquiry. See also Pennsylvania Local Government Investment Trust, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 022283009 (Feb. 21, 1983) (the "Pennsylvania Letter") and accompanying letter of inquiry, in which counsel opined that interests in a local government pool were municipal securities under the Exchange Act that qualified for the exemption from the registration requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. SEC staff did not expressly rely on this opinion in arriving at its no-action position.

21. See, e.g., City of El Paso de Robles, SEC No-Action Letter, Wash. Serv. Bur. (CCH) File No. 111285020 (June 18, 1985) (the "El Paso de Robles Letter"); MAC Warrant Notice, supra note 6. The SEC's position with respect to these two types of non-debt securities stands in contrast to SEC staff's earlier position regarding call options in the CERS Letter, supra note 11.

22. See El Paso de Robles Letter, supra note 21.

23. MAC Warrant Notice, supra note 6. The MAC Warrant Notice was cited with approval by SEC staff in a letter to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. See letter dated August 12, 1981 (note 7) from Thomas G. Lovett, Attorney, SEC, to Owen Carney, Director, Investment Securities Division, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "CP Letter"), reprinted in CP Notice, supra note 6, at 11.

24. See Itel Letter, supra note 11 (term "obligation" in Exchange Act definition of municipal security "would generally include" obligations under the Internal Revenue Code); Bedford-Watt Letter, supra note 11 (Internal Revenue Code "provides a useful analogy"). In the Bedford-Watt Letter, SEC staff recognized that "obligation" under Section 3(a)(29) of the Exchange Act could include non-financial obligations to take actions needed for payment of the security. See also Pennsylvania Letter and accompanying letter of inquiry, supra note 20. In arriving at its opinion that the local government pool interests described in the Pennsylvania Letter were municipal securities, counsel suggested, in reference to the definition of municipal securities in the Exchange Act, "that the word 'obligations' need not be read as 'debt' in this context. The Trust is under obligation to redeem all Shares of Beneficial Interest presented for redemption." In addition, the Chairman of the College Savings Plans Network noted in Congressional testimony that "state-sponsored college tuition programs are secured by the moral or political obligation of the states." Marshall Bennett, Testimony Before the House Committee on Ways and Means, Hearing on Reducing the Tax Burden: II. Providing Tax Relief to Strengthen the Family and Sustain a Strong Economy, 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (June 23, 1999), available at <http://www.house.gov/ways_means/fullcomm/106cong/6-23-99/6-23benn.htm> (visited Aug. 26, 1999) (emphasis added).

25. See El Paso de Robles Letter, supra note 21; MAC Warrant Notice, supra note 6.

26. See 1975 Senate Report, supra note 11, at 90, 92.

27. Id. at 92.

28. See, e.g., House Comm. on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Federal Supervision of Traffic in Investment Securities in Interstate Commerce, H.R.Rep. No. 85, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. 6, 14 (1933) (the "1933 House Report").

29. Id. at 14. This view was confirmed the following year during House committee hearings on the Exchange Act by the Commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission, which was charged with enforcing the Securities Act. See Stock Exchange Regulation: Hearing on H.R. 7852 and H.R. 8720 Before the House Comm. on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. 899 (1934) (the "1934 House Hearings") (statement of James M. Landis, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission). Commissioner Landis stated:

We had that same problem up in the Securities Act, where the exemption that is given to what might be called municipal bonds, and bonds of States and their instrumentalities, and is drawn according to a line that parallels the line that is drawn which makes tax-exempt municipal bonds, State instrumentalities, and so on. In other words, every instrumentality of a State which, like a municipality, or a political subdivision of a State, was exempted from taxation, would be exempted from registration upon an issue of securities. That is the line drawn in the Securities Act. If exempt from taxation they are also exempted from the necessity of registration under that act.

30. See, e.g., Securities Act: Hearings on S. 875 Before the Senate Comm. on Banking and Currency on S. 875, 73d Cong., 1st. Sess. 65 (1933) (the "1933 Senate Hearings") (statement of Sen. Reynolds); id. at 228, 232 (statement of Sen. Kean); id. at 232 (statement of Sen. Costigan); id. at 303 (statement of Sen. Norbeck); 77 Cong. Rec. 2925 (1933) (statement of Rep. Studley).

31. See 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 822 (statement of Rep. Pettingill); id. at 898-9 (statements of James M. Landis, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission; Rep. Pettingill). This concern also served as a primary basis for the exemption of municipal securities under the Securities Act. See 1933 House Report, supra note 28, at 14, and text accompanying note 29 above.

32. See 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 721, 911-3 (statement of Rep. Holmes); Stock Exchange Practices: Hearings on S. Res. 84 and S. Res. 56 and S. Res. 97 Before the Senate Comm. on Banking and Currency, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. 7441-52 (1934) (the "1934 Senate Hearings") (statements of Archibald B. Roosevelt, Roosevelt & Weifold, Inc.; George B. Gibbons, George B. Gibbons & Co.; Sen. Gore; Sen. Goldsborough).

33. See 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 720 (statement of Rep. Holmes).

34. See 1934 Senate Hearings, supra note 32, at 7413 (statements of H.H. Cotton, Investment Bank of Los Angeles; Ferdinand Pecora, Counsel to the Committee; Sen. Fletcher); id. at 7477 (statements of Tom K. Smith, Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury; Sen. Adams; Sen. Walcott); 1934 House Hearings, supra note 29, at 7201(statements of Tom K. Smith, Assistant to the Secretary of the Treasury; Rep. Holmes); id. at 819-23 (statements of George B. Gibbons, George B. Gibbons & Co.; Rep. Merritt; Rep. Rayburn; Rep. Pettengill).

35. See note 29 above and accompanying text.

36. The phrase "security issued or guaranteed by" used in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act introduces bank securities (including bank equity securities) as well as government and municipal securities. In contrast, the phrase "securities which are direct obligations of or obligations guaranteed as to principal or interest by" used in Section 3(a)(12) of the Exchange Act introduced only municipal and government securities. Thus, even though the drafters of both the Securities Act and the Exchange Act thought of municipal and government securities solely as debt securities, the term "obligation" (to the extent such term is limited to debt securities) could only be used in the Exchange Act.

37. 1975 Senate Report, supra note 11, at 47. See also CP Letter (note 7), supra note 23.

38. In testimony at a 1975 Senate committee hearing on the Securities Acts Amendments, a representative of the Municipal Finance Officers Association stated that the municipal securities market "is completely a debt market." Securities Acts Amendments of 1975: Hearings on S. 249 Before the Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 479 (1975) (statement of Michael S. Zarin, Member, Comm. on Governmental Debt Administration, Municipal Finance Officers Association). Having been so informed, the Senate's description in the 1975 Senate Report, supra note 11, at 38, of municipal securities as "debt obligations of state and local government issuers," as noted by some commentators on the March Notice, in fact merely reflected an understanding of the nature of the municipal securities market at such time, not an understanding that the Exchange Act definition of municipal securities was to be limited only to the debt segment of a broader municipal market that might also include equity securities.

39. As noted above, one commentator concedes that interests in higher education trusts "clearly affect public investors and the public interest."

40. Commentators list Congressional concern about unconscionable markups, churning of accounts, misrepresentations, disregard of suitability standards, high-pressure sales techniques, fraudulent trading practices resulting in substantial losses to public investors, and threats to the integrity of the local government capital-raising system. They argue that there is no opportunity for unconscionable markups and little incentive for churning of accounts or use of high-pressure sales techniques for these interests because they are purchased and redeemed at the current net asset value and purchasers do not pay commissions. Commentators also argue that suitability concerns are not raised since local government pools are operated like money market funds and invest solely in the types of investments that their participants are permitted by state law to purchase.

41. One commentator states that protections exist under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, state regulations, voluntary adherence to the Investment Company Act and related federal regulations applicable to investment company securities, and Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 31 relating to accounting and financial reporting for certain investments and for external investment pools.

42. See 1975 Conference Report, supra note 11, at 101.

43. As originally proposed, rule D-9 would have excluded from the definition of customer "the issuer of securities which are the subject of the transaction in question." See "Notice of Filing of Fair Practice Rules," [1977-1987 Transfer Binder] MSRB Manual (CCH) � 10,030 (Sept. 20, 1977). In amending the original proposed rule language to limit this exclusion solely to "the issuer in connection with the sale of a new issue of its securities," the Board stated that it believed "that the protections afforded customers by its rules should be extended to issuers when they act in secondary market transactions." See "Notice of Filing of Amendments to Fair Practice Rules," [1977-1987 Transfer Binder] MSRB Manual (CCH) � 10,058 (Feb. 28, 1978). Given that the Board has always felt that issuers should be considered customers even in secondary market transactions involving their own securities, issuers certainly should be considered customers in transactions involving securities of other issuers. Furthermore, in Congressional testimony on the bankruptcy filing of Orange County, California and its local government pool, SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt discussed customer protection rules of self-regulatory organizations as they may apply to state or local governmental entities acting as customers. See Derivative Financial Instruments Relating to Banks and Financial Institutions: Hearings Before the Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. (1995) ("SEC Testimony").

44. S&P Report, supra note 2, at 3, 6-11. The Board takes no position as to which of these local government pools may issue interests that would constitute municipal fund securities.

45. Id. at 3.

46. One commentator identifies several state-run and county-run pools (including the Orange County, California pool) as having had recent financial difficulties. See also NAST Report, supra note 2, at 2, 5, 38; S&P Report, supra note 2, at 5.

47. NAST has stated that it:

recognizes that potential pool participants have numerous alternative investment vehicles from which to choose. The goal of the … [NAST Guidelines for Local Government Investment Pools] is to insure that local government investment officials, when choosing among their available investment options, are fully aware of significant investment and administrative policies, practices and restrictions of the pool and are thereby able to make informed investment decisions on behalf of the local governments. … NAST further recommends that the broker/dealer community govern itself to follow the same standards of conduct NAST has recommended for treasurers.

NAST Report, supra note 2, at 8. As the self-regulatory organization established by Congress to adopt rules for dealer transactions in municipal securities, the Board has created a body of rules which, together with these proposed rule changes, constitute the self-governance and standards of conduct which NAST has recommended be established.

48. The Board understands that investment strategies, pay-out restrictions, and fees and redemption charges or penalties of the existing higher education trusts vary. At least some higher education trusts permit sales of interests to persons living in other states and permit redemption proceeds to be used to pay higher education expenses in any state. In other cases, redemption proceeds may be limited for use within a specific state. See generally CSPN Report, supra note 3. Thus, a single customer may have a choice of investments in various higher education trusts having widely differing investment strategies and terms. The Board takes no position as to which of these higher education trusts may issue interests that would constitute municipal fund securities.

49. See NAST Report, supra note 2, at 8 ("The investment alternatives offered by brokers/dealers to public finance officials should be suitable for the public entity's objectives."). The fact that a local government pool's assets are invested in investments that are legally available as direct investments by local governments does not resolve suitability issues. See note 39 above. As with transactions in any other municipal security, rule G-19 would require a dealer recommending a transaction in a municipal fund security to have reasonable grounds for believing that the recommendation is suitable, based upon information available from the issuer or otherwise and the facts disclosed by or otherwise known about the customer. These suitability requirements do not differ in substance from those of the NASD, to which dealers effecting transactions in such interests might otherwise be subject if these interests are not municipal securities. See also SEC Testimony, supra note 43.

50. See, e.g., Sections 15(b)(3) and 15B(a)(3) of the Exchange Act.

51. Actual interpretations relating to how certain rules would be applied to transactions in municipal fund securities would be filed with the SEC to the extent required under Section 19(b) of the Exchange Act and Exchange Act Rule 19b-4.

52. This view regarding sales of municipal fund securities as part of a primary offering is based on SEC staff's statement in the SEC Letter, supra note 4, that it would view such securities as having been sold in a primary offering for purposes of Rule 15c2-12.

53. Two commentators suggest that the Board exempt municipal fund securities from the prohibition in rule A-13(e) from passing through underwriting assessments to issuers.

54. Commentators note that many local government pools have annual share turn-over rates of 3 to 4 times their assets, due to the fact that many participants are investing short-term funds that move in and out of the pools frequently during the course of the year. Another commentator believes that this multiplier may reach as high as 10 times assets. One commentator estimates that total issuances of interests in local government pools may be on the same order of magnitude as issuances of traditional municipal securities.

55. In the alternative, some commentators suggest that underwriting assessments should be based on net issuances of municipal fund securities, taking into account all securities retired. Another commentator suggests a flat annual or monthly fee set at a modest level.

56. Two commentators suggest that local government pool interests be excluded from this definition. The Board declines to do so for the reasons noted above.

57. Thus, an associated person who sells both municipal fund securities and other types of municipal securities would be required to qualify as a municipal securities representative or general securities representative.

58. One commentator suggests exempting dealers in local government pool interests from the requirement of having municipal securities principals, provided that they meet the requirements regarding principals established by the NASD. The Board believes that dealers effecting transactions in municipal fund securities must have a municipal securities principal who is required to be familiar with Board rules.

59. Several factors influenced the Board's determination to exempt such securities from rule G-14, as set forth in the March Notice. If the Board receives information in the future that practices have developed in the municipal fund security market that merit reporting of transaction information, it will consider whether to revisit the exemption from rule G-14.

60. Disclosure of deferred commissions or other charges would cover, for example, any deferred sales load or, in the case of interests in certain higher education trusts, any penalty imposed on a redemption that is not for a qualifying higher education expense.

61. In addition to the comments described below, one commentator suggests that the draft amendment relating to disclosure of deferred commissions or redemption charges be clarified to indicate that information may be disclosed in a program description document together with the confirmation or periodic statement. The Board believes that this provision does not require revision since it already permits disclosure of such information in a document separate from the confirmation or periodic statement, although the confirmation or periodic statement must disclose that such deferred commission or charge may exist and that information will be furnished upon written request.

62. They note that individual confirmations for the frequent purchases and redemptions of local government pool interests would impose high administrative and cost burdens.

63. It states that this would be "analogous to and consistent with" the provisions of Rule 10b-10 permitting periodic statements in lieu of confirmations for non-periodic transactions in tax-qualified individual retirement and individual pension plans.

64. In addition, the Board has made a minor language change to paragraph (a)(vi)(G) to make clearer that quarterly statements in lieu of individual confirmations also would be available for arrangements involving a group of two or more customers.

65. A commentator states that requiring customer consent to receive quarterly statements would impose administrative burdens on dealers that are not justified by any investor protection interest. It notes practical difficulties with sending confirmations to some members of a group plan and quarterly statements to others, stating that if the dealer fails to receive consent from any customer, it might be forced to send individual confirmations to all customers. The commentator states that, in adopting the investment company plan exception to the confirmation requirements in Rule 10b-10, the SEC recognized that securities sold through such plans do not require the same level of reporting as other securities transactions since their regularized nature raised fewer concerns about whether a particular transaction was executed consistent with the expectations of the customer.

66. A commentator states that municipal fund securities will not be issued in certificated form and therefore the delivery provisions under subparagraph (a)(i)(A)(7) would not be relevant. Subparagraph (a)(i)(A)(7) would require that the confirmation for a municipal fund security transaction indicate the purchase price (exclusive of commission) of each share or unit and the number of shares or units to be delivered, regardless of whether a physical or book-entry delivery of the securities will occur.

67. The commentator states that such securities are ineligible for ratings and such notation might be misleading. However, the Board notes that a relatively small number of local government pools have in fact been rated. See NAST Report, supra note 2, at 36. See generally S&P Report, supra note 2.

68. The Board understands that, in the context of local government pools, the term "yield" may be used to refer to historical returns that may be used as a basis for comparing investment performance. See NAST Report, supra note 2, at 8. References in rule G-21 to yield, consistent with its use in other Board rules, refer to a future rate of return on securities and do not refer to historical yields. The Board notes that any use of historical yields would be subject to section (c) of rule G-21, which provides that no dealer shall publish or cause to be published any advertisement concerning municipal securities which such dealer knows or has reason to know is materially false or misleading. Thus, a dealer advertisement of municipal fund securities that refers to yield typically would require a description of the nature and significance of the yield shown in the advertisement in order to assure that such advertisement is not false or misleading.

69. Rule G-32 defines underwriting period for securities purchased by a dealer (not in a syndicate) as the period commencing with the first submission to the dealer of an order for the purchase of the securities or the purchase of the securities from the issuer, whichever first occurs, and ending at such time as the following two conditions both are met: (1) the issuer delivers the securities to the dealer, and (2) the dealer no longer retains an unsold balance of the securities purchased from the issuer or 21 calendar days elapse after the date of the first submission of an order for the securities, whichever first occurs. However, since the issuer continuously delivers municipal fund securities, the first condition for the termination of the underwriting period remains unmet.

70. In addition, in the case of a repeat purchaser of municipal fund securities for which no official statement in final form is being prepared, no new delivery of the written notice to that effect or of any official statement in preliminary form would be required so long as the customer has previously received it in connection with a prior purchase. However, if an official statement in final form is subsequently prepared, the customer's next purchase would trigger the delivery requirement with respect to such official statement.

71. Dealers may still elect to acquire CUSIP numbers for municipal fund securities and to make such securities depository eligible, subject to meeting all of the eligibility requirements of the CUSIP Service Bureau and of any securities depository, respectively.

72. If the primary offering is exempt from Rule 15c2-12 (other than as a result of being a limited offering as described in section (d)(1)(i) of the Rule) and an official statement has been prepared by the issuer, then the dealer would be expected to send the official statement, together with Form G-36(OS), to the Board under rule G-36(c)(i).

73. Rule G-36(d) provides that a dealer that has previously sent an official statement to the Board also is required to send to the Board any amendments made by the issuer during the underwriting period. In view of the extended underwriting period for municipal fund securities and the possibility that the issuer may change the dealer that participates in the sale of the securities during the life of the program, the Board would interpret this provision of the rule to obligate any dealer that is at the time of an amendment then serving as underwriter for the municipal fund securities to send the amendment to the Board, regardless of whether that dealer or another dealer sent the original official statement to the Board.

74. Underlining indicates additions to existing Board rules; strikethrough indicates deletions from existing Board rules.

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

Municipal Fund Securities

The Board is requesting comments regarding the application of existing Board rules and certain draft rule changes relating to municipal fund securities: rules A-13, G-3, G-8, G-14, G-15, G-26 and G-34 and draft rule D-12

        During the last year, the Board has learned that sales of certain interests in trust funds held by state or local governmental entities may be effected by or through brokers, dealers or municipal securities dealers ("dealers"). In particular, the Board has reviewed two types of state or local governmental programs in which dealers may effect transactions in such interests: pooled investment funds under trusts established by state or local governmental entities ("local government pools")⁽¹⁾ and higher education savings plan trusts established by states ("higher education trusts").⁽²⁾ In response to a request of the Board, staff of the Division of Market Regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") has stated that "at least some interests in local government pools and higher education trusts may be, depending on the facts and circumstances, 'municipal securities' for purposes of the Exchange Act."⁽³⁾ Such interests that may, in fact, constitute municipal securities are referred to herein as "municipal fund securities." To the extent that dealers effect transactions in municipal fund securities, such transactions would be subject to the jurisdiction of the Board pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act.

        Although municipal fund securities constitute municipal securities, they may not have many of the features typically associated with traditional municipal securities. Instead, municipal fund securities appear to have features similar to investment company securities or variable contract products. For example, according to information provided to the Board by dealers (or their counsel) that participate in programs involving these types of interests, municipal fund securities provide investment return and are valued based on the investment performance of an underlying pool of assets having an aggregate value that may increase or decrease from day to day, rather than providing interest payments (either paid currently or at maturity) at a stated rate or discount, as is the case for traditional municipal securities. In addition, unlike traditional municipal securities, municipal fund securities do not have stated par values or maturity dates and cannot be priced based on yield or dollar price.⁽⁴⁾

        Although Board rules generally have been drafted to accommodate the characteristics of debt obligations and not investment interests such as municipal fund securities, the Board believes that most of its current rules can appropriately be applied to municipal fund securities. Nonetheless, the Board believes that certain rules should be amended to recognize the unique characteristics of municipal fund securities. The Board is seeking comment from industry participants regarding these draft rule changes as well as regarding the application of existing rules to municipal fund securities.

 

APPLICATION OF EXISTING RULES RELATING TO MUNICIPAL SECURITIES

        SEC View Regarding Applicability of Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12. With respect to the applicability to municipal fund securities of Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12, relating to municipal securities disclosure, staff of the SEC's Division of Market Regulation has stated:

[W]e note that Rule 15c2-12(f)(7) under the Exchange Act defines a "primary offering" as including an offering of municipal securities directly or indirectly by or on behalf of an issuer of such securities. Based upon an analysis of programs that have been brought to our attention, it appears that interests in local government pools or higher education trusts generally are offered only by direct purchase from the issuer. Accordingly, we would view those interests as having been sold in a "primary offering" as that term is defined in Rule 15c2-12. If a dealer is acting as an "underwriter" (as defined in Rule 15c2-12(f)(8)) in connection with that primary offering, the dealer may be subject to the requirements of Rule 15c2-12.⁽⁵⁾

Rule 15c2-12(f)(8) defines an underwriter as "any person who has purchased from an issuer of municipal securities with a view to, or offers or sells for an issuer of municipal securities in connection with, the offering of any municipal security, or participates or has a direct or indirect participation in any such undertaking, or participates or has a participation in the direct or indirect underwriting of any such undertaking."⁽⁶⁾

Questions regarding application of Rule 15c2-12 should be directed to SEC staff.

        Board View Regarding Applicability of Existing Board Rules. Although the draft rule changes described below are designed to make the Board's rules better accommodate the nature of municipal fund securities, dealers should be aware that if they effect any transactions in municipal fund securities prior to completion by the Board of rulemaking in this area, they nonetheless are obligated to comply with all existing Board rules. Set forth below are certain principals that dealers should keep in mind in seeking to comply with Board rules.

        Consistent with SEC staff's view regarding the sale in primary offerings of municipal fund securities, dealers acting as underwriters in primary offerings of municipal fund securities would be subject to the requirements of rule G-36. Thus, unless such primary offering falls within one of the stated exemptions in Rule 15c2-12, the Board expects that the dealer would receive a final official statement from the issuer or its agent under its contractual agreement entered into pursuant to Rule 15c2-12(b)(3). Such official statement should be received from the issuer in sufficient time for the dealer to send the official statement, together with Form G-36(OS), to the Board within one business day of receipt but no later than 10 business days after any final agreement to purchase, offer, or sell the municipal fund securities.⁽⁷⁾ Since (as described below) the Board believes that municipal fund securities remain in their underwriting period so long as they continue to be sold and delivered, the dealer would remain obligated under rule G-36(d) to send to the Board, within one business day of receipt, any amendments made to the official statement during such extended underwriting period.⁽⁸⁾

        In addition, municipal fund securities sold in a primary offering would constitute new issue municipal securities for purposes of rule G-32 so long as the securities remain in their underwriting period. Since the Board understands that issuers of municipal fund securities, unlike issuers of traditional municipal securities, are continuously issuing and delivering the securities as customers make purchases, the Board believes that municipal fund securities would remain in their underwriting period so long as such issuance and delivery continues.⁽⁹⁾ Thus, a dealer effecting a transaction in a municipal fund security would be required to deliver to the customer the official statement by settlement of such transaction. However, in the case of a customer purchasing such securities who is a repeat purchaser, no new delivery of the official statement would be required so long as the customer has previously received it in connection with a prior purchase and the official statement has not been changed from the one previously delivered to that customer.

        Certain other implications arise under Board rules as a result of the status, in the view of SEC staff, of sales of municipal fund securities as primary offerings. For example, the Board believes that all purchases of municipal fund securities from an issuer by or through a dealer, whether acting as principal or agent, as part of a primary offering are subject to the underwriting fee assessed under rule A-13, unless such primary offering meets the requirements of any of the existing exceptions in the rule. Furthermore, dealers are reminded that the definition of "municipal securities business" under rules G-37 and G-38 includes the purchase of a primary offering from the issuer on other than a competitive bid basis or the offer or sale of a primary offering on behalf of any issuer. Thus, a dealer's transactions in municipal fund securities may impact upon such dealer's obligations under rules G-37 and G-38.

        Dealers that effect transactions in municipal fund securities prior to completion of the Board's rulemaking process should contact Board staff with any questions regarding application of existing Board rules.

 

Draft Rule Changes

        The draft rule changes would provide a definition, "municipal fund securities," that is designed to include interests in local government pools and higher education trusts as they have been described to the Board. As a general matter, the draft rule changes have been drafted with the view that municipal fund securities should be treated differently from other municipal securities only under circumstances where current rules clearly would not apply properly. In addition, the Board has not attempted to draft any rule changes intended to address secondary market transactions in municipal fund securities since the Board understands that no such market now exists. The Board would undertake appropriate action should a secondary market develop in municipal fund securities.

        Rule D-12 - Definition of Municipal Fund Security. New rule D-12 would define municipal fund security as, in essence, a municipal security that would qualify as a security of an investment company under the Investment Company Act if it had not been issued by a state or local governmental entity.⁽¹⁰⁾ If an investment is a municipal fund security, then dealer transactions in such investments are subject to all Board rules as a municipal security but would receive special treatment in those instances where provisions are added relating specifically to municipal fund securities.

        The draft definition of municipal fund security is not strictly limited to interests in local government pools or higher education trusts but would apply as well to any other municipal security issued under a program that would, but for the identity of the issuer as a state or local governmental entity, constitute an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Furthermore, the Board recognizes that investments having substantially the same purpose as do interests in local government pools or higher education trusts could fail to meet the definition of municipal fund security if the investment program is structured in a manner substantially different from the programs described in this notice. The Board notes that, if such other investments in fact constitute municipal securities, dealer transactions in such investments would be subject to all Board rules as municipal securities.

        Rule A-13 - Assessments. Rule A-13 would be amended to impose, as a separate line item, an underwriting assessment on the sale of municipal fund securities in a primary offering. Since municipal fund securities do not have a par value, the assessment would be based on the purchase price paid by customers, less any commission.⁽¹¹⁾

        Rule G-3 - Professional Qualifications. Amended rule G-3 would permit an associated person qualified as an investment company limited representative to effect transactions in municipal fund securities (but no other municipal securities).⁽¹²⁾ However, a dealer must have one or two municipal securities principals as required under section (b) of rule G-3, even if the dealer's only municipal securities transactions are sales of municipal fund securities.

        Rule G-8 - Recordkeeping. Rule G-8 would be amended to ensure consistency with rules G-3 and G-15, as amended. Thus, amended rule G-8 would recognize that municipal fund securities do not have par values, dollar prices, yields and accrued interest and that some investment company limited representatives would be permitted to effect transactions in municipal fund securities.

        Rule G-14 - Transaction Reporting. The draft rule change would make a minor technical modification in rule G-14(b)(i) in order to make clear that certain types of municipal securities transactions may be excluded from transaction reporting as provided in the Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures. In the Procedures, the language change would expressly exempt any transaction in municipal fund securities from the customer transaction reporting system.⁽¹³⁾

        Rule G-15 - Customer Confirmations. Various amendments would be made to rule G-15 to deal with the concepts of par value, yield, dollar price, maturity date and interest, none of which appropriately apply to a municipal fund security. Thus, in connection with a confirmation of a transaction in municipal fund securities, a dealer would use the purchase or sale price of the securities, as appropriate, rather than par value and would omit yield, dollar price, accrued interest, extended principal, maturity date and interest rate. Dealers selling municipal fund securities would be required to include the denomination or purchase price of each share or unit of such securities as well as the number of such shares or units to be delivered. In addition, a confirmation of a municipal fund security transaction would require a disclosure to the effect that a deferred commission or other charge may be imposed upon redemption, if applicable.⁽¹⁴⁾ The amendment also would make clear that dealers must confirm redemptions of municipal fund securities by customers. Finally, the amendment would permit dealers to use quarterly statements, rather than transaction-by-transaction confirmations, if customers are purchasing municipal fund securities in an agreed amount on a periodic basis. This quarterly report alternative is essentially identical with the periodic reporting provision under SEC Rule 10b-10, with some consolidation to focus exclusively on municipal fund securities and the incorporation of an existing no-action position of the SEC applicable to certain investment company plans.⁽¹⁵⁾

        Rule G-26 - Customer Account Transfers. The draft amendment to rule G-26 amends the definition of "nontransferable asset" to reflect the fact that the issuer of municipal fund securities may limit which dealers may carry accounts for customers in such securities.

        Rule G-34 - CUSIP Numbers and Depository Eligibility. Municipal fund securities would be exempted from the requirements of rule G-34 since no secondary market is expected to develop.⁽¹⁶⁾

* * * * *

        Comments from all interested parties are welcome. Comments should be submitted no later than May 15, 1999 and may be directed to Ernesto A. Lanza, Associate General Counsel. Written comments will be available for public inspection.

March 17, 1999

TEXT OF DRAFT AMENDMENTS⁽¹⁷⁾

Rule A-13. Underwriting and Transaction Assessments for Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) No change.

(b) Underwriting Assessments – Amount. For those primary offerings subject to assessment under section (a) above, the amount of the underwriting fee is:

        (i) No change.

        (ii) for primary offerings in which all securities offered, at the option of the holder thereof, may be tendered to an issuer of such securities or its designated agent for redemption or purchase at par value or more at least as frequently as every two years until maturity, earlier redemption, or purchase by an issuer or its designated agent, .001% ($.01 per $1,000) of the par value; and

        (iii) for primary offerings in which all securities offered constitute municipal fund securities, ____% ($.___ per $1,000) of the purchase price paid by customers, exclusive of any commission; and

        (iv) for all other primary offerings subject to this rule, .003% ($.03 per $1,000) of the par value.

 

Rule D-12. "Municipal Fund Security"

The term "municipal fund security" shall mean a municipal security issued by an issuer that, but for the application of Section 2(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, would constitute an investment company within the meaning of Section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.

 

Rule G-3. Classification of Principals and Representatives; Numerical Requirements; Testing; Continuing Education Requirements

(a) Municipal Securities Representative.

        (i) No change.

        (ii) Qualification Requirements.

        (A)-(B) No change.

        (C) The requirements of subparagraph (a)(ii)(A) of this rule shall not apply to any person who is duly qualified as a limited representative – investment company and variable contracts products by reason of having taken and passed the Limited Representative – Investment Company and Variable Contracts Products Examination, but only if such person’s activities with respect to municipal securities described in paragraph (a)(i) of this rule are limited solely to municipal fund securities.

        (D) Any person who ceases to be associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer (whether as a municipal securities representative or otherwise) for two or more years at any time after having qualified as a municipal securities representative in accordance with subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) shall again meet the requirements of subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) prior to being qualified as a municipal securities representative.

(iii) Apprenticeship.

        (A) Any person who first becomes associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in a representative capacity (whether as a municipal securities representative, or general securities representative or limited representative – investment company and variable contracts products) without having previously qualified as a municipal securities representative, or general securities representative or limited representative – investment company and variable contracts products shall be permitted to function in a representative capacity without qualifying pursuant to subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B) for a period of at least 90 days following the date such person becomes associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, provided, however, that such person shall not transact business with any member of the public with respect to, or be compensated for transactions in, municipal securities during such 90 day period, regardless of such person’s having qualified in accordance with the examination requirements of this rule. A person subject to the requirements of this paragraph (a)(iii) shall in no event continue to perform any of the functions of a municipal securities representative after 180 days following the commencement of such person’s association with such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, unless such person qualifies as a municipal securities representative pursuant to subparagraphs (a)(ii)(A), (B) or (C) or (B).

        (B) Prior experience, of at least 90 days, as a general securities representative, limited representative – investment company and variable contracts products mutual fund salesperson or limited representative – government securities representative, will meet the requirements of this paragraph (a)(iii).

 

Rule G-8. Books and Records to be Made by Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

 

(a) Description of Books and Records Required to be Made. Except as otherwise specifically indicated in this rule, every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall make and keep current the following books and records, to the extent applicable to the business of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (i) Records of Original Entry. "Blotters" or other records of original entry containing an itemized daily record of all purchases and sales of municipal securities, all receipts and deliveries of municipal securities (including certificate numbers and, if the securities are in registered form, an indication to such effect), all receipts and disbursement of cash with respect to transactions in municipal securities, all other debits and credits pertaining to transactions in municipal securities, and in the case of municipal securities brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers, all other cash receipts and disbursements if not contained in the records required by any other provision of this rule. The records of original entry shall show the name or other designation of the account for which each such transaction was effected (whether effected for the account of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, the account of a customer, or otherwise), the description of the securities, the aggregate par value of the securities, the dollar price or yield and aggregate purchase or sale price of the securities, accrued interest, the trade date, and the name or other designation of the person from whom purchased or received or to whom sold or delivered. With respect to accrued interest and information relating to "when issued" transactions which may not be available at the time a transaction is effected, entries setting forth such information shall be made promptly as such information becomes available. Dollar price, yield and accrued interest relating to any transaction shall be required to be shown only to the extent required to be included in the confirmation delivered by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in connection with such transaction under rule G-12 or rule G-15.

        (ii)-(x) No change.

        (xi) Customer Account Information. A record for each customer, other than an institutional account, setting forth the following information to the extent applicable to such customer:

        (A)-(G) No change.

        (H) signature of municipal securities representative, and general securities representative or limited representative – investment company and variable contracts products introducing the account and signature of a municipal securities principal, municipal securities sales principal or general securities principal indicating acceptance of the account;

        (I)-(K) No change.

For purposes of this subparagraph, the terms "general securities representative," and "general securities principal" and "limited representative – investment company and variable contracts products" shall mean such persons as so defined by the rules of a national securities exchange or registered securities association. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "institutional account" shall mean the account of (i) a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or registered investment company; (ii) an investment adviser registered under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940; or (iii) any other entity (whether a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust, or otherwise) with total assets of at least $50 million. Anything in this subparagraph to the contrary notwithstanding, every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall maintain a record of the information required by items (A), (C), (F), (H), (I) and (K) of this subparagraph with respect to each customer which is an institutional account.

(xii)-(xix) No change.

(b)-(f) No change.

(g) Price substituted for par value of municipal fund securities. For purposes of this rule, each reference to the term "par value," when applied to a municipal fund security, shall be substituted with (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

 

Rule G-14. Reports of Sales or Purchases

(a) No change.

(b) Transactions Reporting Requirements.

        (i) Each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall report to the Board or its designee information about its transactions in municipal securities to the extent required by, and using the formats and within the timeframes specified in, Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures. Transaction information collected by the Board under this rule will be used to make public reports of market activity and prices and to assess transaction fees. The transaction information will be made available by the Board to the Commission, securities associations registered under Section 15A of the Act and other appropriate regulatory agencies defined in Section 3(a)(34)(A) of the Act to assist in the inspection for compliance with and the enforcement of Board rules.

        (ii)-(iii) No change. 

 

Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures

(a) No change.

(b) Customer Transactions.

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) The following transactions shall not be required to be reported under this section (b):

    (A) A a transaction in a municipal security that is ineligible for assignment of a CUSIP number by the Board or its designee; shall not be required to be reported under this section (b).

    (B) a transaction in a municipal fund security.

(iv) No change.

 

Rule G-15. Confirmation, Clearance and Settlement of Transactions with Customers

(a) Customer Confirmations

        (i) At or before the completion of a transaction in municipal securities with or for the account of a customer, each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall give or send to the customer a written confirmation that complies with the requirements of this paragraph (i):

        (A) Transaction information. The confirmation shall include information regarding the terms of the transaction as set forth in this subparagraph (A):

        (1)-(2) No change.

        (3) Par value. The par value of the securities shall be shown, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) No change.

        (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, in place of par value, the confirmation shall show (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the total purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the total sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

        (4) No change.

        (5) Yield and dollar price. Yields and dollar prices shall be computed and shown in the following manner, subject to the exceptions stated in subparagraph (A)(5)(d) of this paragraph:

        (a)-(c) No change.

        (d) Notwithstanding the requirements noted in subparagraphs (A)(5)(a) through (c) of this paragraph, above:

        (i)-(v) No change.

        (vi) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, neither yield nor dollar price shall be shown.

        (6) Final Monies. The following information relating to the calculation and display of final monies shall be shown:

        (a) No change.

        (b) amount of accrued interest, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no figure for accrued interest shall be shown;

        (c) if the securities pay interest on a current basis but are traded without interest, a notation of "flat;"

        (d) extended principal amount, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (i) No change.

        (ii) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no extended principal amount shall be shown;

(e)-(h) No change.

        (7) Delivery of securities. The following information regarding the delivery of securities shall be shown:

        (a) Securities other than bonds or municipal fund securities. For securities other than bonds or municipal fund securities, denominations to be delivered;

        (b) No change.

        (c) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, the denomination or purchase price, exclusive of commission, of each share or unit and the number of shares or units to be delivered;

        (d) Delivery instructions. Instructions, if available, regarding receipt or delivery of securities, and form of payment, if other than as usual and customary between the parties.

        (8) No change.

        (B) Securities identification information. The confirmation shall include a securities identification which includes, at a minimum:

        (1)-(2) No change.

        (3) maturity date, if any, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a) No change.

       (b) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no maturity date shall be shown;

        (4) interest rate, if any, with special requirements for the following securities:

        (a)-(e) No change.

        (f) Municipal fund securities. For municipal fund securities, no interest rate shall be shown;

        (C) No change.

        (D) Disclosure statements:

        (1)-(2) No change.

        (3) The confirmation for securities for which a deferred commission or other charge is imposed upon redemption or as a condition for payment of principal or interest thereon shall include a statement that the customer may be required to make a payment of such deferred commission or other charge upon redemption of such securities or as a condition for payment of principal or interest thereon, as appropriate, and that information concerning such deferred commission or other charge will be furnished upon written request.

        (ii)-(iii) No change.

        (iv) Confirmation to customers who tender put option bonds or municipal fund securities. A broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer that has an interest in put option bonds (including acting as remarketing agent) and accepts for tender put option bonds from a customer, or that has an interest in municipal fund securities (including acting as agent for the issuer thereof) and accepts for redemption municipal fund securities tendered by a customer, is engaging in a transaction in such municipal securities and shall send a confirmation under paragraph (i) of this section.

        (v) No change.

        (vi) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

        (A)-(F) No change.

        (G) The term "periodic municipal fund security plan" shall mean any written authorization for a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, acting as agent, to purchase, sell or redeem for a customer a specific municipal fund security or securities, in specific amounts (calculated in security units or dollars), at specific time intervals and setting forth the commissions or charges to be paid by the customer in connection therewith (or the manner of calculating them).

        (vii) Price substituted for par value of municipal fund securities. For purposes of this rule, each reference to the term "par value," when applied to a municipal fund security, shall be substituted with (i) in the case of a purchase of a municipal fund security by a customer, the purchase price paid by the customer, exclusive of any commission, and (ii) in the case of a sale or tender for redemption of a municipal fund security by a customer, the sale price or redemption amount paid to the customer, exclusive of any commission or other charge imposed upon redemption or sale.

        (viii) Alternative periodic reporting for transactions in municipal fund securities pursuant to a periodic municipal fund security plan. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section (a), a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer may effect transactions in municipal fund securities with customers without giving or sending to such customer the written confirmation required by paragraph (i) of this section (a) at or before completion of each such transaction if:

        (A) such transactions are effected pursuant to a periodic municipal fund security plan; and

        (B) such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer gives or sends to such customer within five business days after the end of each quarterly period a written statement disclosing, for each purchase, sale or redemption effected for or with, and each payment of investment earnings credited to or reinvested for, the account of such customer during the reporting period, the information required to be disclosed to customers pursuant to subparagraphs (A) through (D) of paragraph (i) of this section (a), with the information regarding each transaction clearly segregated; provided that it is permissible for the name and address of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and the customer to appear once at the beginning of the document; and

        (C) in the case of a periodic municipal fund security plan that consists of an arrangement involving a group of two or more customers and contemplating periodic purchases of municipal fund securities by each customer through a person designated by the group, such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (1) gives or sends to the designated person, at or before the completion of the transaction for the purchase of such municipal fund securities, a written notification of the receipt of the total amount paid by the group;

        (2) sends to anyone in the group who was a customer in the prior quarter and on whose behalf payment has not been received in the current quarter a quarterly written statement reflecting that a payment was not received on such customer’s behalf; and

        (3) advises each customer in the group if a payment is not received from the designated person on behalf of the group within 10 days of a date certain specified in the arrangement for delivery of that payment by the designated person and either (a) thereafter sends to each customer the written confirmation described in paragraph (i) of this section (a) for the next three succeeding payments, or (b) includes in the quarterly statement referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) each date certain specified in the arrangement for delivery of a payment by the designated person and each date on which a payment received from the designated person is applied to the purchase of municipal fund securities; and

        (D) such customer is provided with prior notification in writing disclosing the intention to send the written information referred to in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph (viii) on a quarterly basis in lieu of an immediate confirmation for each transaction, and such customer has consented in writing.

(b)-(e) No change.

 

Rule G-26. Customer Account Transfers

 

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms have the following meanings:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) The term "nontransferable asset" means an asset that is incapable of being transferred from the carrying party to the receiving party because (A) it is an issue in default for which the carrying party does not possess the proper denominations to effect delivery and no transfer agent is available to re-register the securities, or (B) it is a municipal fund security which the issuer requires to be held in an account carried by one or more specified brokers, dealers or municipal securities dealers that does not include the receiving party.

(b) No change.

(c) Transfer Instructions.

        (i) No change.

        (ii) If an account includes any nontransferable assets, the carrying party must request, in writing and prior to or at the time of validation of the transfer instruction, further instructions from the customer with respect to the disposition of such assets. Such request shall provide the customer with the following alternative methods of disposition of nontransferable assets, if applicable:

        (A) No change.

        (B) retention by the carrying party for the customer’s benefit; or

        (C) in the case of a nontransferable asset described in section (a)(iii)(B), transfer to another broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, if any, which the issuer has specified as being permitted to carry such asset.

(d)-(i) No change.

 

Rule G-34. CUSIP Numbers and New Issue Requirements

(a)-(b) No change.

(c) CUSIP Number Eligibility Exemptions. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to an issue of municipal securities (or for the purpose of section (b) any part of an outstanding maturity of an issue) which (i) does not meet the eligibility criteria for CUSIP number assignment or (ii) consists entirely of municipal fund securities.

---

ENDNOTES

1. The Board understands that local government pools are established by state or local governmental entities as trusts that serve as vehicles for the pooled investment of public moneys of participating governmental entities. Participants purchase interests in the trust and trust assets are invested in a manner consistent with the trust's stated investment objectives. Investors generally do not have a right to control investment of trust assets.

2. The Board understands that higher education trusts are established by states under section 529(b) of the Internal Revenue Code as "qualified state tuition programs" through which individuals make investments for the purpose of accumulating savings for qualifying higher education costs of beneficiaries. Individuals purchase interests in the trust and trust assets are invested in a manner consistent with the trust's stated investment objectives. Investors do not have a right to control investment of trust assets.

3. Letter dated February 26, 1999 from Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, SEC, to Diane G. Klinke, General Counsel of the Board, in response to letter dated June 2, 1998 from Diane G. Klinke to Catherine McGuire (the "February 26 SEC Letter").

4. See New York State College Choice Tuition Savings Program, SEC No-Action Letter (Sept. 10, 1998), and incoming letter from Steven B. Boehm, Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, dated August 31, 1998; New Hampshire Higher Education Savings Plan Trust, SEC No-Action Letter (June 30, 1998), and incoming letter from Georgie A. Thomas, Treasurer, State of New Hampshire, and Gregory A. Sandomirsky and Leonard Weiser-Varon, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., dated April 4, 1998.

5. February 26 SEC Letter. See also Teachers Personal Investors Services, Inc. and TIAA-CREF Individual and Institutional Services, Inc., SEC No-Action Letter (Sept. 10, 1998).

6. The definition of underwriter excludes any person whose interest is limited to a commission, concession, or allowance from an underwriter or dealer not in excess of the usual and customary distributors' or sellers' commission, concession, or allowance.

7. If a primary offering of municipal fund securities is exempt from Rule 15c2-12 (other than as a result of being a limited offering as described in section (d)(1)(i) of the Rule) and an official statement has been prepared by the issuer, then the dealer would be expected to send the official statement, together with Form G-36(OS), to the Board under rule G-36(c)(i).

8. Rule G-36(d) provides that a dealer that has previously provided an official statement to the Board is required to send any amendments to the official statement made by the issuer during the underwriting period. In view of the extended underwriting period for municipal fund securities and the possibility that the issuer may change the dealer that participates in the sale of the securities during the life of the program, the Board believes that this provision of the rule should be read to obligate any dealer that is at the time of an amendment then serving as underwriter for the municipal fund securities to send the amendment to the Board, regardless of whether that dealer or another dealer sent the original official statement to the Board.

9. Rule G-32 defines underwriting period for securities purchased by a dealer (i.e., not by a syndicate) as the period commencing with the first submission to the dealer of an order for the purchase of the securities or the purchase of the securities from the issuer, whichever first occurs, and ending at such time as the following two conditions both are met: (1) the issuer delivers the securities to the dealer, and (2) the dealer no longer retains an unsold balance of the securities purchased from the issuer or 21 calendar days elapse after the date of the first submission of an order for the securities, whichever first occurs. However, since the issuer continuously delivers municipal fund securities, the first condition for the termination of the underwriting period remains unmet.

10. This should be distinguished from shares in a mutual fund registered under the Investment Company Act with assets invested in municipal securities, which shares would not constitute municipal fund securities.

11. The actual amount of such assessment is not reflected in the draft amendment since the Board has recently begun a review of all Board fees and expects to consider the level of assessments relating to offerings of municipal fund securities in conjunction with this review.

12. Thus, an associated person who sells both municipal fund securities and other types of municipal securities would continue to be required to qualify as either a municipal securities representative or a general securities representative.

13. A number of factors unique to municipal fund securities have contributed to the Board's determination to exempt such securities from rule G-14 at this time. In particular, municipal fund securities do not trade in the secondary market. Thus, for example, unlike the bulk of data currently received by the Board through the system, any data obtained regarding transactions in municipal fund securities would be limited to one-time sales to customers upon initial issuance and one-time purchases (or redemptions) from customers upon cashing out. Municipal fund securities are sold by dealers on an agency basis generally without payment of commissions by customers; therefore, dealers effecting transactions in municipal fund securities would have little opportunity to alter the pricing on such securities from that set by the issuer. Furthermore, certain critical data elements which the transaction reporting system is currently structured to collect (e.g., dollar price, yield, etc.) would not apply to transactions in such securities. Nonetheless, should the Board in the future receive information that practices have developed in the municipal fund security market that merit reporting of transaction information, the Board would consider whether to revisit the exemption from rule G-14.

14. Disclosure of deferred commissions or other charges would cover, for example, any deferred sales load as is sometimes seen with traditional mutual funds or, in the case of interests in certain higher education trusts, any penalty imposed on a redemption that is not for a qualifying higher education expense.

15. See College Retirement Equities Fund, SEC No-Action Letter (Jan. 31, 1991).

16. The requirements of rule G-34 had been imposed on dealers principally to improve secondary market efficiencies and therefore would provide little or no benefit in connection with municipal fund securities. However, dealers may still elect to acquire CUSIP numbers for municipal fund securities and to make such securities depository eligible, subject to meeting all of the eligibility requirements of the CUSIP Service Bureau and of any securities depository, respectively.

17. Underlining indicates additions; strikethrough indicates deletions.

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

MSRB and NCSHA Announce Test Program for the Electronic Submission of Continuing Disclosure Information to the MSRB

        Today the MSRB and the National Council of State Housing Agencies ("NCSHA") are announcing the implementation of a test program for the electronic submission and dissemination of continuing disclosure information, including quarterly financial information. The NCSHA and a group of state housing financing agencies ("HFAs") have been working to develop an initiative in electronic dissemination of disclosure information. The MSRB has joined with the NCSHA and certain HFAs to test a mechanism through which electronic disclosure can be provided to the market. The test program ("CDINet Web Test") will allow certain HFAs to submit financial reports and material event notices, in Microsoft Word and Excel formats, to the MSRB’s CDINet Web Test through the use of a Web browser with a connection to the Internet. The MSRB will forward the test information electronically to recipients that have agreed to participate as Test Subscribers to CDINet Web Test. The MSRB emphasizes that CDINet Web Test is only a test program and the MSRB cannot be considered by Test Submitters or Test Subscribers to be officially broadcasting information for purposes of SEC Rule 15c2-12.

        The MSRB and NCSHA are pleased to be participating in this test program. Electronic dissemination of disclosure information should result in faster dissemination of such information in a format that is easier to use by market participants. The MSRB intends to have the CDINet Web Test begin on May 24, 1999.

        If you have any questions or are interested in subscribing to the CDINet Web Test, please contact Thomas A. Hutton at the address below:

Thomas A. Hutton
Director of MSIL and Computer Systems
Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
1640 King Street, Suite 300
Alexandria, VA 22314
Voice: (202) 223-9503
Fax: (703) 683-3634
Thutton@msrb.org

May 20, 1999

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

Timely Dissemination of Information on Advance Refunded Securities

Recently, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board discussed the difficulties that market participants are having in obtaining timely information about which CUSIP numbers are being refunded in advance refunded securities transactions. The Board believes that it is important for investors and other market participants to know as early as possible whether the issues they hold are advance refunded, or are subject to a plan of advance refunding. The Board also believes that, in the case of partial refunding of a maturity, investors need to know as soon as possible the portion of their holdings that have been advance refunded. This information is particularly important to bond funds because they must price securities in the portfolio accurately each day. In addition, diversification requirements for a bond fund might prevent the fund from buying an issuer’s securities if the fund cannot readily determine the portion of its existing securities of that issuer that have been advance refunded.

The Board believes that not all market participants recognize the importance to investors of knowing as soon as possible the information described above. This may explain why such information is sometimes delayed in reaching the market. Also, it is possible that parties responsible for ordering lotteries are unaware that investors and other market participants need lotteries to be conducted on partially pre-refunded maturities as soon as possible so that the market has adequate information to price the specific securities held by investors.

The Board is taking the opportunity to raise industry awareness of these issues by posting this notice on its Web site, publishing the notice in MSRB Reports, and providing similar letters to organizations whose members have a role in the dissemination of information on advance refunded securities. The Board believes that all industry professionals dealing with advance refunding information should be aware that the market value of outstanding securities might be affected by advance refunding activities. Therefore, market professionals in control of information about advance refunding plans should make certain that public information about the identity of issues that are targeted to be advance refunded is communicated to the market through information vendors or other means. Taking such steps will ensure that trading in the secondary market issues will be fair and will occur without unnecessary disparities in information. In particular, the Board believes that information identifying specific CUSIP numbers that are planned to be advance refunded, along with any early call dates and call prices for pre-refunded issues, should be communicated to the market as soon as possible. The Board is not aware of any reason that such information could not be provided by or at least shortly after, the date of sale of the refunding issue. The Board also believes that, if permitted by the bond resolution or trust indenture, lotteries for partially pre-refunded maturities should take place immediately after the closing of the advance refunded issue and the funding of the escrow. The Board urges the drafters of bond resolutions and trust indentures to provide for lotteries to take place on this timetable rather than requiring lotteries to be delayed until near the time of the early redemption date set by the pre-refunding.

* * *

The Board anticipates that through improved education and communication about these issues market participants will have more timely access to information about advance refunded issues. Moreover, widespread dissemination of this information will promote efficient trading in the securities.

April 22, 1999

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

PUBLIC REPORTING OF

INDIVIDUAL TRANSACTIONS IN FREQUENTLY TRADED

MUNICIPAL SECURITIES: RULE G-14

 

Service Approved

        On December 16, 1999, the Commission approved a service to provide a daily public report containing information on individual transactions in frequently traded municipal securities reported to the Board by dealers under Board rule G-14. To obtain a subscription to the new report service, it will be necessary to sign a subscription agreement, but there will be no fee.

        Questions about subscriptions to the service may be directed to Thomas A. Hutton, Director, Municipal Securities Information Library. Questions about rule G-14 and criteria for including trades in the Daily Transaction Report may be directed to Harold L. Johnson, Deputy General Counsel, or Larry M. Lawrence, Policy and Technology Advisor.

 

DAILY TRANSACTION REPORT

        On December 16, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") approved the Board’s plan to produce a daily report containing information on individual transactions in frequently traded municipal securities (the "Daily Transaction Report").¹ The transaction information on the report will come from dealer reports made to the Board under Board rule G-14 on transaction reporting. This rule requires dealers to report essentially all inter-dealer and customer transactions in municipal securities to the Board by midnight of trade date.

        The new report will be the third product offered by the Board to increase the amount of price transparency in the municipal securities market. Like the Board’s current Combined and Inter-Dealer Daily Reports, the Daily Transaction Report will provide information on "frequently traded" issues – issues on which at least four transaction reports were received for a given trade date. Also like the current Daily Reports, the new report will be produced and made available electronically by approximately 7:00 a.m. on the day following trade date. Electronic reports will be produced in the same three formats – printable, comma-delimited, and fixed record length – as the current Daily Reports.² However, unlike the current Daily Reports, the Daily Transaction Report will provide transaction detail on each reported trade in a frequently traded issue, rather than merely providing the daily high, low and average prices.³

Description of Report

        The Daily Transaction Report will display, for each transaction in a frequently traded security: the CUSIP number, a short description of the issue, the par value traded, the time of trade reported by the dealer, and the price of the transaction.⁴ Transactions will be categorized as in one of three transaction "types": (i) sales by dealers to customers; (ii) purchases by dealers from customers; or (iii) inter-dealer trades. Reports will be organized by issue, with the most frequently traded issues listed first. Within an issue, trades will be listed in order of time of trade, from the earliest reported time of trade to the latest.⁵ Although the size of each day's report will depend on market activity, it is expected that the Daily Transaction Report on average will provide information on approximately 9,000 individual transactions in approximately 1,000 frequently traded issues. Sample copies showing the appearance of the Daily Transaction Report can be obtained at the Board’s web site at www.msrb.org.

Subscriptions

        The Daily Transaction Report will be available by subscription. To obtain a subscription, it will be necessary to sign a subscription agreement, but there will be no fee. The subscription agreement outlines the Board’s disclaimer of liability, the proprietary nature of and usage restrictions on the CUSIP numbers and CUSIP descriptions contained in the report, and certain other matters.

       The Board expects to disseminate the Daily Transaction Report to subscribers via the Internet. Information on how to subscribe, a downloadable subscription agreement, instructions for accessing files via the Internet and a set of sample files are available from  www.msrb.org. In addition, recent Daily Transaction Reports will be available for examination, also free of charge, in the Board’s Public Access Facility in Alexandria, Virginia. The Board expects that the new Daily Transaction Report will be made available by mid-January 2000.

 

BOARD TO CONSIDER EXPANDED TRANSPARENCY

        A long-standing goal of the Board is to provide market participants with information about the value of securities.⁶ Over the past five years, with the advent of the Transaction Reporting Program, the Board has been working toward making transaction price information "transparent" in the marketplace and seeking ways to make that transparency information more comprehensive and contemporaneous.⁷ The new Daily Transaction Report represents the next step in this continuing process.

        As part of its ongoing effort, the Board intends to monitor the impact of the new report in the market. After the report has been operational for a period of time, the Board will review its operation and will consider whether to lower the "frequently traded" threshold. Doing so would have the effect of listing more issues and more prices in each day’s report and would make the report even more comprehensive in its representation of market activity.

        The Board also is reviewing various options for collecting and disseminating transaction transparency information on a more contemporaneous basis. As part of this effort, the Board has created a web-based demonstration system that simulates the kind of information that a "real-time" transparency system might provide and how it might be presented to investors. This demonstration system is available at the Board’s web site at www.msrb.org. Comments from market participants on the demonstration system are welcome. The Board will draw upon its experience with the "real-time" demonstration system as it considers further steps toward expanded municipal securities market transparency.

December 29, 1999

---

ENDNOTES

1. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42241 (December 16, 1999).

2. The "printable" format can be printed with little or no change by an end-user. The "comma-delimited" and "fixed record length" files can easily be sorted or converted by an end-user’s spreadsheet or other application program (e.g., Microsoft Excel).

3. The Board also will continue to use all the transaction information reported by dealers to maintain a market surveillance database. The surveillance database is available to the Commission, the National Association of Securities Dealers Regulation (NASDR) and the bank regulatory agencies responsible for enforcement of Board rules.

4. The report displays a dollar price for each transaction. If the dealer submits a yield with the transaction report, the yield is included on the Daily Transaction Report with the dollar price. There are instances, however, when yields are not reported. For example, dealers for secondary market inter-dealer transactions do not submit yields because the automated comparison system used to report inter-dealer trades cannot accept yield information on those transactions. In certain customer transactions, such as those in defaulted or variable rate securities, it also may be impossible for the dealer to submit a yield. Transactions with customers or dealers in new issues for which no settlement date has been set may be effected and reported by dealers either with a dollar price or a yield. It is not possible for the dealer to report both yield and dollar price on these transactions. The MSRB Transaction Reporting System will calculate a dollar price from yields submitted for these transactions, using an assumed settlement date if necessary. There must be, however, sufficient securities data available to make the calculation (e.g., coupon, dated date, maturity date, first interest payment date, etc.). For additional information, see "Public Reporting of Transactions in Municipal Securities: Rule G-14," MSRB Reports, Vol. 18, No. 2 (August 1998) at 25-27.

5. Where trades are submitted by dealers with an invalid time or no time of trade, the report shows the time of trade as "0."

6. See, e.g., "From the Chairman," MSRB Reports, Vol. 8, No. 5 (December 1988) at 2.

7. See, e.g., "Board to Proceed with Pilot Program to Disseminate Inter-Dealer Transaction Information," MSRB Reports, Vol. 14, No. 1 (January 1994) at 13; "Reporting Inter-Dealer Transactions to the Board: Rule G-14," MSRB Reports, Vol. 14, No. 5 (December 1994) at 3-6; and "Transaction Reporting Program for Municipal Securities," MSRB Reports, Vol. 15, No. 1 (April 1995)

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

Revised Test Specifications and Study Outline for the Series 52 Examination

On June 9, 1999, the Board filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a proposed rule change to revise the test specifications and the study outline for the Board’s Municipal Securities Representative Qualification Examination (Test Series 52). The Board requested that the Commission delay the effectiveness of the revised test specifications and study outline until August 1, 1999. The examination will remain a three-hour 100 question examination administered by NASD Regulation, Inc. using the PROCTOR system.

The study outline was revised to delete topics that are no longer relevant and to add or revise topics that reflect additions to or changes in practices, products and Board rules since the outline was last revised. The revised outline also provides for the inclusion of new Board rules as they are promulgated. You may view the revised study outline here.

Test specifications for an examination indicate the number of questions assigned to a specific topic area. The test specifications for the Series 52 examination have been revised to provide for greater emphasis under the topic areas of Economic Activity, Government Policy and the Factors Affecting Interest Rates and Federal Legal Considerations. The revised test specifications are as follows:

 

June 9, 1999

To view the following documents, YOU MUST HAVE THE ADOBE� ACROBAT� READER INSTALLED ON YOUR COMPUTER TO VIEW AND PRINT THE DOCUMENTS.

If you do not have a copy of Acrobat reader, you may obtain one free from Adobe's Web site at, https://www.adobe.com/ or purchase a copy from a software retailer.

 Download: Study Outline Municipal Securities Representative Qualification Examination. August 1999 Edition

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

Technical Amendments Filed

The Board has filed with the SEC a series of technical amendments to rules A-3, A-5, A-7, A-11 through A-15, A-17, D-5, G-1 through G-3, G-5 through G-9, G-11 through G-16, G-18, G-20, G-23, G-27, G-28, G-32, G-34, G-36, G-37 and G-39. The technical amendments become operative on July 1, 1999.

        On May 28, 1999, the Board filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") a series of technical amendments to rules A-3, A-5, A-7, A-11 Through A-15, A-17, D-5, G-1 Through G-3, G-5 Through G-9, G-11 Through G-16, G-18, G-20, G-23, G-27, G-28, G-32, G-34, G-36, G-37 and G-39¹. The technical amendments become operative on July 1, 1999.

        The Board adopted the technical amendments for the purpose of making certain non-substantive changes to the affected rules. These changes are designed to:

• ensure uniform usage of the term "brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers" throughout all Board rules;

• eliminate the usage of the term "municipal securities business" in rules other than rules G-37 and G-38;

• make certain grammatical corrections;

• make all rule language gender neutral;

• correct certain cross-references to other Board rules, SEC rules or federal statutes, including updating the cross-reference in rule G-8(a)(xi) to Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to take into account the reallocation of regulatory oversight of investment advisers between the SEC and the states effected by the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996 and the rules promulgated thereunder;

• ensure uniform references to sections and paragraphs within Board rules; and

• eliminate duplicative, superfluous or obsolete rule language, including elimination of the cross-reference and related language in rule G-12(e)(xvi) regarding subparagraph (b)(i)(D) of rule G-33, which subparagraph was previously deleted by the Board.

May 28, 1999

 

Text of Technical Amendments²

Rule A-3 – Membership on the Board

(a) Number and Representation. The Board shall consist of 15 members, at all times equally divided among the following groups:

        (i) Public Representatives. Individuals who are not associated with any broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer (other than by reason of being under common control with, or indirectly controlling, any broker or dealer which is not a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer), at least one of whom shall be representative of investors in municipal securities, and at least one of whom shall be representative of issuers of municipal securities;

        (ii) Broker-Dealer Representatives. Individuals who are associated with and representative of municipal securities brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers which are not banks or subsidiaries or departments or divisions of banks;

        (iii) No change.

(b) Increase or Decrease in Number. The total number of members of the Board may be increased or decreased from time to time by rule of the Board, but in no event shall the total number of members of the Board be less than 15. Any such increase or decrease shall be in multiples of six so that the total number of members of the Board shall always be an odd number, equally divided among the three groups of representatives enumerated in paragraph section (a) of this rule.

(c) Nomination and Election of Members.

        (i) Members shall be nominated and elected in accordance with the procedures specified by this rule. All members of the Board shall be elected for terms of three years, so that the terms of office of one-third of the whole Board shall expire each year. The terms of office of all members of the Board shall commence on October 1 of the year in which elected and shall terminate on September 30 of the year in which their terms expire. No member of the Board may succeed himself or herself in office and no broker-dealer representative or bank representative may be succeeded in office by any person associated with the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with which such member was associated at the expiration of his such member’s term.

        (ii) The Board will appoint a Nominating Committee composed of nine members. The membership of the Nominating Committee shall consist of six Board members and three persons who are not members of the Board. Of the six Board members, two shall be associated with and representative of bank dealers bank representatives, two shall be associated with and representative of brokers, dealers, and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers broker-dealer representatives, and two shall not be associated with any broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer (other than by reason of being under common control with, or indirectly controlling any broker or dealer which is not a municipal securities broker or municipal securities dealer) public representatives. Of the three non-Board members, one shall be associated with and representative of bank dealers, one shall be associated with and representative of brokers, dealers, and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers, and one shall not be associated with any broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer (other than by reason of being under common control with, or indirectly controlling any broker or dealer which is not a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer). In appointing persons to serve on the Nominating Committee, factors to be considered include the need to achieve broad geographic representation on such Committee, as well as diversity in the size and type of brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers represented on such Committee.

        (iii)-(v) No change.

        (vi) The public representatives on the Board will, prior to their assumption of office, be subject to approval by the Commission to assure that no one of them is associated with any broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer (other than by reason of being under common control with, or indirectly controlling, any broker or dealer which is not a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer) and that at least one of the public representatives of the Board is representative of investors in municipal securities and at least one is representative of issuers of municipal securities.

        (vii) No change.

(d) Resignation and Removal of Members. A member may resign from the Board by submitting a written notice of resignation to the Chairman of the Board which shall specify the effective date of such member’s resignation. In no event shall such date be more than 30 days from the date of delivery of such notice to the Chairman. If no date is specified, the resignation shall become effective immediately upon its delivery to the Chairman. In the event the Board shall find that any member has willfully violated any provision of the Act, any rule or regulation of the Commission thereunder, or any rule of the Board or has abused his or her authority or has otherwise acted, or failed to act, so as to affect adversely the public interest or the best interests of the Board, the Board may, upon the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the whole Board (which shall include the affirmative vote of at least one public representative, one broker-dealer representative and one bank representative), remove such member from office.

(e) Vacancies. Vacancies on the Board shall be filled by vote of the members of the Board, subject to the Commission’s power of approval referred to in paragraph section (c) of this rule with respect to public representatives. Any person so elected to fill a vacancy shall serve for the term, or any unexpired portion of the term, for which such person’s predecessor was elected. For purposes of this rule, the term "vacancies on the Board" shall include any vacancy resulting from the resignation of any person duly elected to the Board prior to the commencement of his or her term.

(f) Compensation and Expenses. Members shall be entitled to an allowance for transportation expenses, to the extent provided by resolution of the Board, from their home to the site of a meeting of the Board and from the site of such meeting to their home, together with a per diem to be set by the Board for those days or fraction thereof on which they attend Board meetings or participate in other designated activities. Members of the Board shall also be entitled to reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred by them in connection with any other official business of the Board. Except as provided in paragraph section (c) of rule A-6, no member of the Board shall be entitled to receive any other compensation from the Board.

 

Rule A-5 – Officers and Employees of the Board

(a) No change.

(b) Election of Officers of the Board. Officers of the Board shall be elected annually from among the members, by secret, written ballot of the members, at a meeting of the Board held prior to October 1 of each year according to procedures adopted by the Board. Officers shall serve for a term commencing on the October 1 next following their election and ending with the succeeding September 30; provided, however, that any officer may resign his or her office prior to the expiration of his or her term by filing a written notice of resignation with the Secretary to the Board which shall specify the effective date of such resignation. In no event shall such date be less than 10 days or more than 30 days from the date of filing of such notice. If no date is specified, the resignation shall become effective 10 days from the date of filing. The Board may remove any officer at any time by two-thirds vote of the whole Board. Vacancies in office shall be filled as soon as practicable by vote of the members and any person elected to fill a vacancy shall serve only for the remainder of his or her predecessor’s term.

(c)-(d) No change.

 

Rule A-7 – Assessments

The Board shall, by rule, provide for the costs and expenses of its operation and administration by levying such fees and charges on municipal securities brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers as may be determined necessary or appropriate by the Board.

 

Rule A-11 – Indemnification of Members, Employees and Arbitrators

Each member and employee of the Board and each arbitrator selected by the Board under Rule G-35 shall be indemnified and held harmless against all liabilities and related expenses incurred in connection with the performance of his or her official duties, provided that such member, employee or arbitrator has acted, or omitted to act, in good faith and within the scope of his or her authority.

 

 

Rule A-12 – Initial Fee

Prior to effecting any transaction in or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of any municipal security, a broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer shall pay to the Board an initial fee of $100, accompanied by a written statement setting forth the name, address and Securities and Exchange Commission registration number of the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer on whose behalf such fee is paid. The Commission registration number shall also be set forth on the face of the remittance. Such fee shall be payable at the offices of the Board. in Washington, D.C. In the event any person subject to this rule shall fail to pay the required fee, the Board may recommend to the Commission that the registration of such person with the Commission be suspended or revoked.

 

Rule A-13 – Underwriting and Transaction Assessments for Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) Underwriting Assessments-Scope. Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall pay to the Board an underwriting fee as set forth in paragraph section (b) for all municipal securities purchased from an issuer by or through such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, whether acting as principal or agent, as part of a primary offering, provided that this rule shall not apply to a primary offering of securities if all such securities in the primary offering:

        (i)-(iv) No change.

If a syndicate or similar account has been formed for the purchase of the securities, the underwriting fee shall be paid by the managing underwriter on behalf of each participant in the syndicate or similar account.

(b)-(e) No change.

 (f) Definitions. (i) For purposes of this rule, the term "primary offering" shall mean an offering of municipal securities directly or indirectly by or on behalf of the issuer of such securities, including any remarketing of such securities directly by or on behalf of the issuer of such securities.

 

Rule A-14 – Annual Fee

In addition to any other fees prescribed by the rules of the Board, each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall pay an annual fee to the Board of $200, with respect to each fiscal year of the Board in which the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer conducts a municipal securities business activities. Such fee must be received at the office of the Board in Alexandria, Virginia no later than October 31 of the fiscal year for which the fee is paid, accompanied by the invoice sent to the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer by the Board, or a written statement setting forth the name, address and Commission registration number of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer on whose behalf the fee is paid.

 

Rule A-15 – Notification to Board of Termination of Municipal Securities Business Activities and Change of Name or Address

(a) Procedure for Notifying Board of Termination. A broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer that ceases to be engaged in a municipal securities business activities must promptly notify the Board of such broker’s, dealer’s or municipal securities dealer’s change of status by filing with the Board at its office in Washington, D.C. a written statement setting forth such broker’s, dealer’s or municipal securities dealer’s name, address and Commission registration number and the fact that such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is no longer engaging in a municipal securities business activities.

(b) Obligation to Pay Fees. A broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer that files notification with the Board pursuant to paragraph section (a) of this rule shall be obligated to pay the fees owed to the Board at the time of filing of such notification.

 

Rule A-17 – Confidentiality of Examination Reports

Any report of an examination or of information extracted from a report of an examination ("examination report") of a municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer furnished to the Board by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to section 15(B)(c)(7)(B) of the Act and rule 15Bc7-1 thereunder shall be maintained and utilized in accordance with the following terms and conditions, in order to ensure the confidentiality of any information contained in such reports:

        (1) Any such examination report shall be reviewed only by authorized members of the Board’s staff; no member of the Board shall have access, directly or indirectly, to an examination report. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the staff of the Board may furnish to the Board or any appropriate committee thereof summaries or other communications relating to the examination reports, provided that such summaries or other communications shall not contain information which might make it possible to identify the municipal securities brokers, dealers or municipal securities dealers or associated persons which are the subject of the examination reports to which any such summary or other communication relates.

        (2)-(4) No change.

 

 

Rule D-5 – "Member and Initial Member"

 

The term "member" shall mean a member of the Board. The term "initial member" shall mean a member appointed by the Commission pursuant to the provisions of section 15B(b)(1) of the Act or to fill a vacancy on the Board resulting from the death, resignation or removal of an initial member prior to the expiration of his term of office.

 

Rule G-1 – Separately Identifiable Department or Division of a Bank

(a)-(c) No change.

(d) The fact that the bank’s municipal securities dealer activities are conducted in more than one geographic organizational or operational unit of the bank shall not preclude a finding that the bank has a separately identifiable department or division for purposes of this rule, provided, however, that all such units are identifiable and that the requirements of subparagraphs (1) and (2) of paragraph section (a) of this rule are met with respect to each such unit. All such geographic, organizational or operational units of the bank shall be considered in the aggregate as the separately identifiable department or division of the bank for purposes of this rule.

 

Rule G-2 – Standards of Professional Qualification

No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall effect any transaction in, or induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any municipal security unless such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and every natural person associated with such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is qualified in accordance with the rules of the Board.

 

 

Rule G-3 – Classification of Principals and Representatives; Numerical Requirements; Testing; Continuing Education Requirements

No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or person who is a municipal securities representative, municipal securities principal, municipal securities sales principal or financial and operations principal (as hereafter defined) shall be qualified for purposes of rule G-2 unless such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or person meets the requirements of this rule.

(a)-(c) No change.

(d) Financial and Operations Principal.

        (i) Definition. The term "financial and operations principal" means a natural person associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer (other than a bank dealer or a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(2) or (3) subparagraph (a)(2)(iv), (v) or (vi) of rule 15c3-1 under the Act or exempted from the requirements of rule 15c3-1 in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) thereof), whose duties include:

(A)-(G) No change.

        (ii) No change.

        (iii) Numerical Requirements. Every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer (other than a bank dealer and a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(2) or (3) subparagraph (a)(2)(iv), (v) or (vi) of rule 15c3-1 under the Act or exempted from the requirements of rule 15c3-1 in accordance with paragraph (b)(3) thereof) shall have at least one financial and operations principal, including its chief financial officer, qualified in accordance with paragraph (d)(ii) of this rule.

(e)-(f) No change.

(g) Waiver of Qualification Requirements.

        (i) The requirements of paragraphs (a)(ii), (a)(iii), b(ii) (b)(ii) and (c)(ii) may be waived in extraordinary cases for any associated person of a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who demonstrates extensive experience in a field closely related to the municipal securities business activities of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer. Such waiver may be granted by

(A)-(B) No change.

        (ii) No change.

(h) No change.

 

 

Rule G-5 – Disciplinary Actions by Appropriate Regulatory Agencies; Remedial Notices by Registered Securities Associations

(a) No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall effect any transaction in, or induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any municipal security in contravention of any effective restrictions imposed upon such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer by the Commission pursuant to sections 15(b)(4) or (5) or 15B(c)(2) or (3) of the Act or by an appropriate regulatory agency pursuant to section 15B(c)(5) of the Act or by a registered securities association pursuant to rules adopted under section 15A(b)(7) of the Act, and no natural person shall be associated with a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in contravention of any effective restrictions imposed upon such person by the Commission pursuant to sections 15(b)(6) or 15B(c)(4) of the Act or by an appropriate regulatory agency pursuant to section 15B(c)(5) of the Act or by a registered securities association pursuant to rules adopted under section 15A(b)(7) of the Act.

(b) No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer that is a member of a registered securities association shall effect any transaction in, or induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any municipal security, or otherwise act in contravention of or fail to act in accordance with rules adopted by the association as of April 3, 1984, pertaining to remedial activities of members experiencing financial or operational difficulties, as if such rules were applicable to such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer.

 

Rule G-6 – Fidelity Bonding Requirements

No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer that is a member of a registered securities association shall be qualified for purposes of rule G-2 unless such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer has met the fidelity bonding requirements set forth in the rules of such association, to the same extent as if such rules were applicable to such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer.

 

Rule G-7 – Information Concerning Associated Persons

(a) No associated person (as hereinafter defined) of a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall be qualified for purposes of rule G-2 of the Board unless such associated person meets the requirements of this rule. The term "associated person" as used in this rule means (i) a municipal securities principal, (ii) a municipal securities sales principal, (iii) a financial and operations principal, and (iv) a municipal securities representative.

(b) Every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall obtain from each of its associated persons (as defined in paragraph section (a) of this rule), and each associated person shall furnish to the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with which such person is or seeks to be associated, a questionnaire, which shall be signed by a municipal securities principal or general securities principal, containing at least the following information:

        (i) such person’s name, residence address, social security number, and the starting date or anticipated starting date of such person’s employment or other association with such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer;

        (ii)-(vii) No change.

        (viii) a record of any convictions of such person within the past ten years involving the purchase or sale of any security, the taking of a false oath, the making of a false report, bribery, perjury, burglary, or conspiracy to commit any such offense; or arising out of the conduct of the business of a broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, investment advisor, bank, insurance company or fiduciary; or involving the larceny, theft, robbery, extortion, forgery, counterfeiting, fraudulent concealment, embezzlement, fraudulent conversion, or misappropriation of funds or securities; or involving the violation of section 152, 1341, 1342, or 1343 or chapter 25 or 47 of title 18, United States Code; and

        (ix)-(x) No change.

A completed Form U-4 or similar form prescribed by the Commission or a registered securities association for municipal securities brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers or, in the case of a bank dealer a completed Form MSD-4 or similar form prescribed by the appropriate regulatory agency for such bank dealer, containing the foregoing information, shall satisfy the requirements of this paragraph section.

(c) To the extent any information furnished by an associated person pursuant to paragraph section (b) of this rule is or becomes materially inaccurate or incomplete, such associated person shall furnish in writing to the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with which such person is or seeks to be associated a statement correcting such information.

(d) For the purpose of verifying the information furnished by an associated person pursuant to paragraph section (b) of this rule, every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall make inquiry of all employers of such associated person during the three years immediately preceding such person’s association with such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer concerning the accuracy and completeness of such information as well as such person’s record and reputation as related to the person’s ability to perform his or her duties and each such prior employer which is a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall make such information available within ten business days following a request made pursuant to the requirements of this paragraph section (d).

(e) Every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall maintain and preserve a copy of the questionnaire furnished pursuant to paragraph section (b) of this rule, and of any additional statements furnished pursuant to paragraph section (c) of this rule, until at least three years after the associated person’s employment or other association with such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer has terminated.

(f) Every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall maintain and preserve a record of the name and residence address of each associated person, designated by the category of function performed (whether municipal securities principal, municipal securities sales principal, municipal securities representative or financial and operations principal) and indicating whether such person has taken and passed the qualification examination for municipal securities principals, municipal securities sales principals, or municipal securities representatives or financial and operations principals prescribed by the Board or was exempt from the requirement to take and pass such examination, indicating the basis for such exemption, until at least three years after the associated person’s employment or other association with such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer has terminated.

(g) Every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer which is a member of a registered securities association shall file with such association, every bank dealer shall file with the appropriate regulatory agency for such bank dealer, and every municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer other than a bank dealer which is not a member of a registered securities association shall file with the Commission, such of the information prescribed by this rule as such association, agency, or the Commission, respectively, shall by rule or regulation require.

(h) Any records required to be maintained and preserved pursuant to this rule shall be preserved in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs sections (d), (e) and (f) of rule G-9 of the Board.

 

Rule G-8 – Books and Records to be Made by Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers

(a) Description of Books and Records Required to be Made. Except as otherwise specifically indicated in this rule, every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall make and keep current the following books and records, to the extent applicable to the business of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer:

        (i) Records of Original Entry. "Blotters" or other records of original entry containing an itemized daily record of all purchases and sales of municipal securities, all receipts and deliveries of municipal securities (including certificate numbers and, if the securities are in registered form, an indication to such effect), all receipts and disbursement of cash with respect to transactions in municipal securities, all other debits and credits pertaining to transactions in municipal securities, and in the case of municipal securities brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers, all other cash receipts and disbursements if not contained in the records required by any other provision of this rule. The records of original entry shall show the name or other designation of the account for which each such transaction was effected (whether effected for the account of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, the account of a customer, or otherwise), the description of the securities, the aggregate par value of the securities, the dollar price or yield and aggregate purchase or sale price of the securities, accrued interest, the trade date, and the name or other designation of the person from whom purchased or received or to whom sold or delivered. With respect to accrued interest and information relating to "when issued" transactions which may not be available at the time a transaction is effected, entries setting forth such information shall be made promptly as such information becomes available.

        (ii) Account Records. Account records for each customer account and account of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer. Such records shall reflect all purchases and sales of municipal securities, all receipts and deliveries of municipal securities, all receipts and disbursements of cash, and all other debits and credits relating to such account. A bank dealer shall not be required to maintain a record of a customer’s bank credit or bank debit balances for purposes of this subparagraph.

        (iii) Securities Records. Records showing separately for each municipal security all positions (including, in the case of a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer other than a bank dealer, securities in safekeeping) carried by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer for its account or for the account of a customer (with all "short" trading positions so designated), the location of all such securities long and the offsetting position to all such securities short, and the name or other designation of the account in which each position is carried. Such records shall also show all long security count differences and short count differences classified by the date of physical count and verification on which they were discovered. Such records shall consist of a single record system. With respect to purchases or sales, such records may be posted on either a settlement date basis or a trade date basis, consistent with the manner of posting the records of original entry of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer. For purposes of this subparagraph, multiple maturities of the same issue of municipal securities, as well as multiple coupons of the same maturity, may be shown on the same record, provided that adequate secondary records exist to identify separately such maturities and coupons. With respect to securities which are received in and delivered out by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer the same day on or before the settlement date, no posting to such records shall be required. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, a non-clearing municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer which effects transactions for the account of customers on a delivery against payment basis may keep the records of location required by this subparagraph in the form of an alphabetical list or lists of securities showing the location of such securities rather than a record of location separately for each security. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, a bank dealer shall maintain records of the location of securities in its own trading account.

        (iv) Subsidiary Records. Ledgers or other records reflecting the following:

(A) municipal securities in transfer;

(B) municipal securities to be validated;

(C) municipal securities borrowed or loaned; and

(D) municipal securities transactions not completed on settlement date.

Such records shall contain the following information:

(A)-(D) No change.

Such records shall be maintained as subsidiary records to the general ledger maintained by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer. Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the requirements of this subparagraph will be satisfied if the information described is readily obtainable from other records maintained by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer.

        (v) Put Options and Repurchase Agreements. Records of all options (whether written or oral) to sell municipal securities (i.e., put options) and of all repurchase agreements (whether written or oral) with respect to municipal securities, in which such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer has any direct or indirect interest or which such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer has granted or guaranteed, showing the description and aggregate par value of the securities, and the terms and conditions of the option, agreement or guarantee.

        (vi) Records for Agency Transactions. A memorandum of each agency order and any instructions given or received for the purchase or sale of municipal securities pursuant to such order, showing the terms and conditions of the order and instructions, and any modification thereof, the account for which entered, the date and time of receipt of the order by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, the price at which executed, the date of execution and, to the extent feasible, the time of execution and, if such order is entered pursuant to a power of attorney or on behalf of a joint account, corporation or partnership, the name and address (if other than that of the account) of the person who entered the order. If an agency order is canceled by a customer, such records shall also show the terms, conditions and date of cancellation, and, to the extent feasible, the time of cancellation. Orders entered pursuant to the exercise of discretionary power by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall be designated as such. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "agency order" shall mean an order given to a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to buy a specific security from another person or to sell a specific security to another person, in either case without such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer acquiring ownership of the security. Customer inquiries of a general nature concerning the availability of securities for purchase or opportunities for sale shall not be considered to be orders. For purposes of this subparagraph and subparagraph (vii) below, the term "memorandum" shall mean a trading ticket or other similar record. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "instructions" shall mean instructions transmitted within an office with respect to the execution of an agency order, including, but not limited to, instructions transmitted from a sales desk to a trading desk.

        (vii) Records for Transactions as Principal. A memorandum of each transaction in municipal securities (whether purchase or sale) for the account of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, showing the price and date of execution and, to the extent feasible, the time of execution; and in the event such purchase or sale is with a customer, a record of the customer’s order, showing the date and time of receipt, the terms and conditions of the order, and the name or other designation of the account in which it was entered and, if such order is entered pursuant to a power of attorney or on behalf of a joint account, corporation, or partnership, the name and address (if other than that of the account) of the person who entered the order.

        (viii) No change.

        (ix) Copies of Confirmations and Certain Other Notices to Customers. A copy of all confirmations of purchase or sale of municipal securities and, in the case of a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer other than a bank dealer, of all other notices sent to customers concerning debits and credits to customer accounts or, in the case of a bank dealer, notices of debits and credits for municipal securities, cash and other items with respect to transactions in municipal securities.

        (x) Financial Records. Every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer subject to the provisions of rule 15c3-1 under the Act shall make and keep current the books and records described in subparagraphs (a)(2), (a)(4)(iv) and (vi), and (a)(11) of rule 17a-3 under the Act.

        (xi) Customer Account Information. A record for each customer, other than an institutional account, setting forth the following information to the extent applicable to such customer:

(A)-(K) No change.

For purposes of this subparagraph, the terms "general securities representative" and "general securities principal" shall mean such persons as so defined by the rules of a national securities exchange or registered securities association. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term "institutional account" shall mean the account of (i) a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or registered investment company; (ii) an investment adviser registered either with the Commission under Section 203 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 or with a state securities commission (or any agency or office performing like functions); or (iii) any other entity (whether a natural person, corporation, partnership, trust, or otherwise) with total assets of at least $50 million. Anything in this subparagraph to the contrary notwithstanding, every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall maintain a record of the information required by items (A), (C), (F), (H), (I) and (K) of this subparagraph with respect to each customer which is an institutional account.

        (xii) Customer Complaints. A record of all written complaints of customers, and persons acting on behalf of customers, and what action, if any, has been taken by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in connection with each such complaint. The term "complaint" shall mean any written statement alleging a grievance involving the activities of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or any associated persons of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with respect to any matter involving a customer’s account.

        (xiii) Records Concerning Deliveries of Official Statements. A record of all deliveries, to purchasers of new issue municipal securities, of official statements or other disclosures concerning the underwriting arrangements required under rule G-32.

        (xiv)-(xv) No change.

        (xvi) Records Concerning Political Contributions and Prohibitions on Municipal Securities Business Pursuant to Rule G-37. Records reflecting:

(A)-(G) No change.

(H) Dealers Brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers shall maintain copies of the Forms G-37/G-38 and G-37x sent to the Board along with the certified or registered mail receipt or other record of sending such forms to the Board.

(I)-(K) No change.

        (xvii)-(xix) No change.

(b) Manner in which Books and Records are to be Maintained. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to require a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to maintain the books and records required by this rule in any given manner, provided that the information required to be shown is clearly and accurately reflected thereon and provides an adequate basis for the audit of such information, nor to require a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to maintain its books and records relating to transactions in municipal securities separate and apart from books and records relating to transactions in other types of securities; provided, however, that in the case of a bank dealer, all records relating to transactions in municipal securities effected by such bank dealer must be separately extractable from all other records maintained by the bank.

(c) Non-Clearing Municipal Securities Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers. A municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer which executes transactions in municipal securities but clears such transactions through a clearing broker, dealer, or bank, or through a clearing agency, shall not be required to make and keep such books and records prescribed in this rule as are customarily made and kept by a clearing broker, dealer, bank or clearing agency; provided that, in the case of a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer other than a bank dealer, the arrangements with such clearing broker, dealer or bank meet all applicable requirements prescribed in subparagraph (b) of rule 17a-3 under the Act, or the arrangements with such clearing agency have been approved by the Commission or, in the case of a bank dealer, such arrangements have been approved by the appropriate regulatory agency for such bank dealer; and further provided that such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall remain responsible for the accurate maintenance and preservation of such books and records if they are maintained by a clearing agent other than a clearing broker or dealer.

(d) Introducing Municipal Securities Brokers, Dealers and Municipal Securities Dealers. A municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer which, as an introducing municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, clears all transactions with and for customers on a fully disclosed basis with a clearing broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, and which promptly transmits all customer funds and securities to the clearing broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer which carries all of the accounts of such customers, shall not be required to make and keep such books and records prescribed in this rule as are customarily made and kept by a clearing broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and which are so made and kept; and such clearing broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall be responsible for the accurate maintenance and preservation of such books and records.

(e)-(f) No change.

Rule G-9 – Preservation of Records

(a) Records to be Preserved for Six Years. Every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall preserve the following records for a period of not less than six years:

        (i)-(iv) No change.

        (v) the customer complaint records described in rule G-8(a)(xii); and

        (vi) if such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is subject to rule 15c3-1 under the Act, the general ledgers described in paragraph (a)(2) of rule 17a-3 under the Act.;

        (vii) the record, described in rule G-27(b)(ii), of each person designated as responsible for supervision of the municipal securities activities of the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer and the designated principal’s supervisory responsibilities, provided that such record shall be preserved for the period of designation of each person designated and for at least six years following any change in such designation.;

        (viii) the records to be maintained pursuant to rule G-8(a)(xvi); provided, however, that copies of Forms G-37x shall be preserved for the period during which such Forms G-37x are effective and for at least six years following the end of such effectiveness.;

        (ix) the records regarding information on gifts and gratuities and employment agreements required to be maintained pursuant to rule G-8(a)(xvii).; and

        (x) the records required to be maintained pursuant to rule G-8(a)(xviii).

(b) Records to be Preserved for Three Years. Every broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall preserve the following records for a period of not less than three years:

        (i)-(vi) No change.

        (vii) if such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is subject to rule 15c3-1 under the Act, the records described in subparagraphs (a)(4)(iv) and (vi) and (a)(11) of rule 17a-3 and subparagraphs (b)(5) and (b)(8) of rule 17a-4 under the Act;

        (viii) the following records, to the extent made or received by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer in connection with its business as such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and not otherwise described in this rule:

(A)-(B) No change.

(C) all written communications received and sent, including inter-office memoranda, relating to the conduct of the activities of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with respect to municipal securities;

(D) all written agreements entered into by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, including agreements with respect to any account; and

(E) No change.

        (ix)-(xiii) No change.

(c) Records to be Preserved for Life of Enterprise. Every municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer other than a bank dealer shall preserve during the life of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and of any successor municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer all partnership articles or, in the case of a corporation, all articles of incorporation or charter, minute books and stock certificate books.

(d) No change.

(e) Method of Record Retention. Whenever a record is required to be preserved by this rule, such record may be retained either as an original or as a copy or other reproduction thereof, or on microfilm, electronic or magnetic tape, or by the other similar medium of record retention, provided that such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall have available adequate facilities for ready retrieval and inspection of any such record and for production of easily readable facsimile copies thereof and, in the case of records retained on microfilm, electronic or magnetic tape, or other similar medium of record retention, duplicates of such records shall be stored separately from each other for the periods of time required by this rule.

(f) Effect of Lapse of Registration. The requirements of this rule shall continue to apply, for the periods of time specified, to any municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer which ceases to be registered with the Commission, except in the event a successor registrant shall undertake to maintain and preserve the books and records described herein for the required periods of time.

(g) Compliance with Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4. Municipal securities brokers Brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers other than bank dealers which are in compliance with rules 17a-3 and 17a-4 under the Act will be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of this rule, provided that the records enumerated in paragraph section (f) of rule G-8 of the Board shall in any event be preserved for the applicable time periods specified in this rule.

 

Rule G-11 – Sales of New Issue Municipal Securities During the Underwriting Period

(a) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms have the following meanings:

        (i)-(vi) No change.

        (vii) The term "related portfolio," when used with respect to a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, means a municipal securities investment portfolio of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or of any person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by or under common control with such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer.

        (viii)-(x) No change.

(b) Disclosure of Capacity. Every broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer which is a member of a syndicate that submits an order to a syndicate or to a member of a syndicate for the purchase of municipal securities held by the syndicate shall disclose at the time of submission of such order if the securities are being purchased for its dealer account, for the account of a related portfolio of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, for a municipal securities investment trust sponsored by such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, or for an accumulation account established in connection with such a municipal securities investment trust.

(c) Confirmations of Sale. Sales of securities held by a syndicate to a related portfolio, municipal securities investment trust or accumulation account referred to in section (b) above shall be confirmed by the syndicate manager directly to such related portfolio, municipal securities investment trust or accumulation account or for the account of such related portfolio, municipal securities investment trust or accumulation account to the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer submitting the order. Nothing herein contained shall be construed to require that sales of municipal securities to a related portfolio, municipal securities investment trust or accumulation account be made for the benefit of the syndicate.

(d) Disclosure of Group Orders. Every broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer that submits a group order to a syndicate or to a member of a syndicate shall disclose at the time of submission of such order the identity of the person for whom the order is submitted. This section shall not apply to a qualified note syndicate as defined in paragraph (a)(x) above.

        (e)-(h) No change.

 

Rule G-12 – Uniform Practice

(a)-(d) No change.

(e) Delivery of Securities. The following provisions shall, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, govern the delivery of securities:

        (i)-(xiii) No change.

        (xiv) Delivery of Registered Securities

(A)-(D) No change.

(E) Form of Registration. Delivery of a certificate accompanied by the documentation required in this paragraph (xiv) shall constitute good delivery if the certificate is registered in the name of:

(1)-(2) No change.

(3) a member of a national securities exchange whose specimen signature is on file with the transfer agent or any other municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who has filed specimen signatures with the transfer agent and places a statement to this effect on the assignment; or

(4) No change.

        (xv) No change.

        (xvi) Money Differences. The following money differences shall not be sufficient to cause rejection of delivery:

 

 

The calculations of the seller shall be utilized in determining the maximum permissible differences and amount of payment to be made upon delivery. However, if the money difference is due to the computation by one party of the formula required under rule G-33 directly to the settlement date of the transaction, and the use by the other party of another computation method (including the dollar price interpolation method permitted under subparagraph (b)(i)(D) of rule G-33), the calculations of the party computing directly to the settlement date shall be deemed accurate, and payment made in accordance with such calculations. The parties shall seek to reconcile any such money differences within ten business days following settlement.

(f) Use of Automated Comparison, Clearance, and Settlement Systems.

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) For purposes of paragraph (i) of this section (f) a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who clears a transaction through an agent who is a member of a registered clearing agency shall be deemed to be a member of such registered clearing agency with respect to such transaction.

(g) Rejections and Reclamations.

        (i)-(ii) No change.

        (iii) Basis for Reclamation and Time Limits. A reclamation may be made by the receiving party or a demand for reclamation may be made by the delivering party if, subsequent to delivery, information is discovered which, if known at the time of the delivery, would have caused the delivery not to constitute good delivery, provided such reclamation or demand for reclamation is made within the following time limits:

(A) Reclamation or demand for reclamation by reason of the following shall be made within one business day following the date of delivery:

(1)-(2) No change.

(3) not good delivery because a legal opinion or other documents referred to in paragraph (e)(xi) hereof were missing.; or

(B)-(D) No change.

(h) Close-Out. Transactions which have been confirmed or otherwise agreed upon by both parties but which have not been completed may be closed out in accordance with this section, or as otherwise agreed by the parties.

        (i) Close-Out by Purchaser. With respect to a transaction which has not been completed by the seller according to its terms and the requirements of this rule, the purchaser may close out the transaction in accordance with the following procedures:

(A)-(B) No change.

(C) Contents of Notices. Written notices sent in accordance with the requirements of subparagraphs (A) or (B) above shall contain the following information:

(1) The notice of close-out required under subparagraph (A) above shall set forth:

(a) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer originating the notice;

(b) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to whom the notice is being sent;

(c)-(j) No change.

(2) The notice of retransmittal required under subparagraph (B) above shall set forth:

(a) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer retransmitting the notice;

(b) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to whom the notice is being retransmitted;

(c) the name of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer originating the notice;

(d)-(k) No change.

(3) The notice of extension of dates required under subparagraph (B) above shall set forth:

(a) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer originating the notice of close-out;

(b) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer retransmitting the notice;

(c) the name of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to whom the notice is being retransmitted;

(d)-(j) No change.

(D)-(G) No change.

        (ii) Close-Out by Seller. If a seller makes good delivery according to the terms of the transaction and the requirements of this rule and the purchaser rejects delivery, the seller may close out the transaction in accordance with the following procedures:

(A) No change.

(B) Content of Notice. The written notice sent in accordance with the requirements of subparagraph (A) above shall set forth:

(1) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer originating the notice;

(2) the name and address of the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer to whom the notice is being sent;

(3)-(10) No change.

(C)-(D) No change.

        (iii)-(iv) No change.

        (i)-(l) No change.

 

Rule G-13 – Quotations Relating to Municipal Securities

 

(a) General. The provisions of this rule shall apply to all quotations relating to municipal securities which are distributed or published, or caused to be distributed or published, by any municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or any person associated with and acting on behalf of a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer. For purposes of this rule, the term "quotation" shall mean any bid for, or offer of, municipal securities, or any request for bids for or offers of municipal securities, including indications of "bid wanted" or "offer wanted." The terms "distributed" or "published" shall mean the dissemination of quotations by any means of communication. Reference in this rule to a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall be deemed to include reference to any person associated with a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer.

(b) Bona Fide Quotations.

        (i) Except as provided below, no municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall distribute or publish, or cause to be distributed or published, any quotation relating to municipal securities, unless the quotation represents a bona fide bid for, or offer of, municipal securities by such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, provided, however, that all quotations, unless otherwise indicated at the time made, shall be subject to prior purchase or sale and to subsequent change in price. If such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is distributing or publishing the quotation on behalf of another broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer, such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall have no reason to believe that such quotation does not represent a bona fide bid for, or offer of, municipal securities. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit requests for bids or offers, including indications of "bid wanted" or "offer wanted," or shall be construed to prohibit nominal quotations, if such quotations are, at the time made, clearly stated or indicated to be such. For purposes of this paragraph, a "nominal quotation" shall mean an indication of the price given solely for informational purposes.

        (ii) No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall distribute or publish, or cause to be distributed or published, any quotation relating to municipal securities, unless the price stated in the quotation is based on the best judgment of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer of the fair market value of the securities which are the subject of the quotation at the time the quotation is made. If a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is distributing or publishing a quotation on behalf of another broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer, such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall have no reason to believe that the price stated in the quotation is not based on the best judgment of the fair market value of the securities of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer on whose behalf such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer is distributing or publishing the quotation.

        (iii) For purposes of subparagraph (i), a quotation shall be deemed to represent a "bona fide bid for, or offer of, municipal securities" if the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer making the quotation is prepared to purchase or sell the security which is the subject of the quotation at the price stated in the quotation and under such conditions, if any, as are specified at the time the quotation is made.

        (iv) No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall knowingly misrepresent a quotation relating to municipal securities made by any other broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer.

(c) Multiple Markets in the Same Securities. No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer participating in a joint account shall, together with one or more other participants in such account, distribute or publish, or cause to be distributed or published, quotations relating to the municipal securities which are the subject of such account if such quotations indicate more than one market for the same securities.

 

Rule G-14 – Reports of Sales or Purchases

 

(a)-(b) No change.

 

Rule G-14 Transaction Reporting Procedures

(a) No change.

(b) Customer Transactions

        (i) No change.

        (ii) The information submitted in accordance with this procedure shall include: the CUSIP number of the security; the trade date; the time of trade execution; the executing broker symbol identifying the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer that effected the transaction; a symbol indicating the dealer’s capacity of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer as buyer or seller in the transaction; the par value traded; the dollar price of the transaction, exclusive of any commission; the yield of the transaction; a symbol indicating the dealer’s capacity of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer as agent for the customer or principal in the transaction; the commission, if any; the settlement date, if known to the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer; a control number, determined by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, identifying the transaction; and a symbol indicating whether the trade has previously been reported to the Board, and, if so, the dealer’s control number used by the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer for the previous report.

        (iii)-(iv) No change.

 

Rule G-15 – Confirmation, Clearance and Settlement of Transactions with Customers

(a) Customer Confirmation.

        (i)-(v) No change.

        (vi) Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

(A)-(D) No change.

(E) Stripped coupon securities. The term "stripped coupon securities" shall have the same meaning as in SEC staff letter (stripped coupon municipal securities) dated January 19, 1989 (Stripped Coupon Municipal Securities, SEC No-Action Letter, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) � 78,949 (Jan. 19, 1989), reprinted in MSRB Reports, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March 1989) at 6-7. the MSRB Manual at � 3571.

(F) No change.

(b) No change.

(c) Deliveries to Customers. Except as provided in section (d) below, a delivery of securities by a broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer to a customer or to another person acting as agent for the customer shall, unless otherwise agreed by the parties or otherwise specified by the customer, be made in accordance with the following provisions:

    (i) Securities Delivered.

(A) All securities delivered on a transaction shall be identical as to the applicable information set forth in paragraph section (a) of this rule. All securities delivered shall also be identical as to the call provisions and the dated date of such securities.

(B) CUSIP Numbers.

(1) The securities delivered on a transaction shall have the same CUSIP number as that set forth on the confirmation of such transaction pursuant to the requirements of paragraph section (a) of this rule; provided, however, that for purposes of this item (1), a security shall be deemed to have the same CUSIP number as that specified on the confirmation (a) if the number assigned to the security and the number specified on the confirmation differ only as a result of a transposition or other transcription error, or (b) if the number specified on the confirmation has been assigned as a substitute or alternative number for the number reflected on the security.

(2) No change.

        (ii) Delivery Ticket. A delivery ticket shall accompany the delivery of securities. Such ticket shall contain the information set forth in paragraph section (a) of this rule.

        (iii) Units of Delivery. Delivery of bonds shall be made in the following denominations:

(A)-(B) No change.

Delivery of other municipal securities shall be made in the denominations specified on the confirmation as required pursuant to paragraph section (a) of this rule.

        (iv)-(xi) No change.

        (xii) Delivery of Registered Securities.

(A) No change.

(B) Delivery to an Agent of the Customer. Registered securities delivered to an agent of a customer may be registered in the customer’s name or as otherwise directed by the customer. If such securities are not so registered, such securities shall be delivered in accordance with the following provisions:

(1)-(4) No change.

(5) Form of Registration. Delivery of a certificate accompanied by the documentation required in this subparagraph (B) shall constitute good delivery if the certificate is registered in the name of:

(a)-(b) No change.

(c) a member of a national securities exchange whose specimen signature is on file with the transfer agent or any other municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who has filed specimen signatures with the transfer agent and places a statement to this effect on the assignment; or

(d) No change.

(6) No change.

(C)-(D) No change.

(d)-(e) No change.

 

Rule G-16 – Periodic Compliance Examination

At least once each twenty-four months, each municipal securities broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer shall be examined in accordance with Section 15B(c)(7) of the Act to determine, at a minimum, whether such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and its associated persons are in compliance with all applicable rules of the Board and all applicable provisions of the Act and rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.

 

Rule G-18 – Execution of Transactions

Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer, when executing a transaction in municipal securities for or on behalf of a customer as agent, shall make a reasonable effort to obtain a price for the customer that is fair and reasonable in relation to prevailing market conditions. A municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer acting as a "broker’s broker" shall be under the same obligation with respect to the execution of a transaction in municipal securities for or on behalf of a broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer. For purposes of this rule, a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer acting as a "broker’s broker" shall mean a municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who effects transactions for the account of other brokers, dealers and municipal securities dealers on a regular basis.

 

Rule G-20 – Gifts and Gratuities

(a) Limitation on Value. No municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall, directly or indirectly, give or permit to be given any thing or service of value, including gratuities, in excess of $100 per year to a person other than an employee or partner of such municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, if such payments or services are in relation to the municipal securities activities of the employer of the recipient of the payment or service. For purposes of this rule the term "employer" shall include a principal for whom the recipient of a payment or service is acting as agent or representative.

(b) No change.

(c) Compensation for Services. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions of section (a) of this rule shall not apply to contracts of employment with or to compensation for services rendered by another person; provided, that there is in existence prior to the time of employment or before the services are rendered a written agreement between the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer subject to this rule and the person who is to perform such services; and provided, further, that such agreement shall include the nature of the proposed services, the amount of the proposed compensation, and the written consent of such person’s employer.

 

Rule G-23 – Activities of Financial Advisors

(a) No change.

(b) Financial Advisory Relationship. For purposes of this rule, a financial advisory relationship shall be deemed to exist when a broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer renders or enters into an agreement to render financial advisory or consultant services to or on behalf of an issuer with respect to a new issue or issues of municipal securities, including advice with respect to the structure, timing, terms and other similar matters concerning such issue or issues, for a fee or other compensation or in expectation of such compensation for the rendering of such services. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a financial advisory relationship shall not be deemed to exist when, in the course of acting as an underwriter, a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer renders advice to an issuer, including advice with respect to the structure, timing, terms and other similar matters concerning a new issue of municipal securities.

(c)-(i) No change.

 

Rule G-27 – Supervision

(a) Obligation to supervise. Each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer ("dealer") shall supervise the conduct of its municipal securities business and the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its associated persons to ensure compliance with Board rules and the applicable provisions of the Act and rules thereunder ("applicable rules").

 

(b) Designation of principals.

        (i) General. Each dealer shall specifically designate one or more associated persons qualified as municipal securities principals, municipal securities sales principals, financial and operations principals in accordance with Board rules, or as general securities principals to be responsible for the supervision of its municipal securities business and the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its associated persons as required by this rule.

        (ii) No change.

        (iii) Appropriate principal. Each dealer shall designate a municipal securities principal as responsible for its supervision under sections (a) and (c) of this rule, except as provided in this section. A non-bank dealer shall, and a non-bank dealer meeting the requirements of Securities Exchange Act rule 15c3-1(a)(2) or (3) or the exemption under rule 15c3-1(b)(3) may, designate a financial and operations principal as responsible for the financial reporting duties specified in rule G-3(d)(i)(A-E) and with primary responsibility for books and records under section (c)(v) below; provided, however, that a non-bank dealer meeting the requirements of Securities Exchange Act rule 15c3-1(a)(2)(iv), (v) or (vi) or the exemption under rule 15c3-1(b)(3) may, but is not required to, designate a financial and operations principal as responsible for such financial reporting duties and with primary responsibility for such books and records. In addition, a municipal securities sales principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under sections (c)(ii), (iii) and (vii) of this rule, to the extent the activities pertain to sales to or purchases from a customer; a general securities principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under sections (c)(v) and (vii)(A) of this rule and under rules G-7(b) and G-21(e); and a financial and operations principal may be designated as responsible for supervision under section (c)(vi) of this rule.

(c) Written supervisory procedures. Each dealer shall adopt, maintain and enforce written supervisory procedures reasonably designed to ensure that the conduct of its municipal securities business and the municipal securities activities of the dealer and its associated persons are in compliance as required in section (a) of this rule. Such procedures shall codify the dealer’s supervisory system for ensuring compliance and, at a minimum, shall establish procedures

        (i)-(vii) No change.

(d) No change.

 

Rule G-28 – Transactions with Employees and Partners of Other Municipal Securities Professionals

(a) Account Instructions. No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall open or maintain an account in which transactions in municipal securities may be effected for a customer who such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer knows is employed by, or the partner of, another municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, or for or on behalf of the spouse or minor child of such person unless such broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer first gives written notice with respect to the opening and maintenance of such account to the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer by whom such person is employed or of whom such person is a partner.

(b) Account Transactions. No broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer shall effect a transaction in municipal securities with or for an account subject to section (a) of this rule unless such broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer

        (i) sends simultaneously to the employing municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer a duplicate copy of each confirmation sent to the customer, and

        (ii) acts in accordance with any written instructions which may be provided to the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer by an employing municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer with respect to transactions effected with or for such account.

 

Rule G-32 – Disclosures in Connection with New Issues

(a) No change.

(b) Responsibility of Managing Underwriters, and Sole Underwriters and Financial Advisors.

        (i)-(ii) No change.

(c) No change.

 

Rule G-34 – CUSIP Numbers and New Issue Requirements

(a) New Issue Securities.

        (i) Assignment of CUSIP Numbers.

(A) Except as otherwise provided in this section (a), each municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who acquires, whether as principal or agent, a new issue of municipal securities from the issuer of such securities for the purpose of distributing such new issue shall apply in writing to the Board or its designee for assignment of a CUSIP number or numbers to such new issue. The municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall make such application as promptly as possible, but in no event later than, in the case of negotiated sales, a time sufficient to ensure assignment of a CUSIP number or numbers on or prior to the business day on which the contract to purchase the securities from the issuer is executed; or, in the case of competitive sales, the date of award. A municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer acting as a financial advisor to an issuer in connection with a competitive sale of an issue shall ensure that application for a CUSIP number or numbers is made in sufficient time to permit assignment of CUSIP numbers prior to the date of award. The municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall provide to the Board or its designee the following information:

(1)-(8) No change.

(B) The information required by subparagraph (i)(A) of this section (a) shall be provided in accordance with the provisions of this subparagraph. At the time application is made the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer making such application shall provide to the Board or its designee a copy of a notice of sale, official statement, legal opinion, or other similar documentation prepared by or on behalf of the issuer, or portions of such documentation, reflecting the information required by subparagraph (i)(A) of this section (a). Such documentation may be submitted in preliminary form if no final documentation is available at the time of application. In such event the final documentation, or the relevant portions of such documentation, reflecting any changes in the information required by subparagraph (i)(A) of this section (a) shall be submitted when such documentation becomes available. If no such documentation, whether in preliminary or final form, is available at the time application for CUSIP number assignment is made, such copy shall be provided promptly after the documentation becomes available.

(C) The provisions of paragraph (i) of this section (a) shall not apply with respect to any new issue of municipal securities on which the issuer or a person acting on behalf of the issuer has submitted an application for assignment of a CUSIP number or numbers to such issue to the Board or its designee.

(D) In the event that the proceeds of the new issue will be used, in whole or in part, to refund an outstanding issue or issues of municipal securities in such a way that part but not all of the outstanding issue or issues previously assigned a single CUSIP number is to be refunded to one or more redemption date(s) and price(s) (or all of an outstanding issue is to be refunded to more than one redemption date and price), the municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall apply in writing to the Board or its designee for a reassignment of a CUSIP number to each part of the outstanding issue refunded to a particular redemption date and price and shall provide to the Board or its designee the following information on the issue or issues to be refunded:

(1)-(3) No change.

The municipal securities broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer also shall provide documentation supporting the information provided pursuant to the requirements of this subparagraph (D).

        (ii) Application for Depository Eligibility, CUSIP Number Affixture and Initial Communications. Each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who acquires, whether as principal or agent, a new issue of municipal securities from the issuer of such securities for the purpose of distributing such new issue ("underwriter") shall carry out the following functions:

(A) Except as otherwise provided in this subparagraph (ii)(A), the underwriter shall apply to a securities depository registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in accordance with the rules and procedures of such depository, to make such new issue depository-eligible. The application required by this subparagraph (ii)(A) shall be made as promptly as possible, but in no event later than one business day after award from the issuer (in the case of a competitive sale) or one business day after the execution of the contract to purchase the securities from the issuer (in the case of a negotiated sale). In the event that the full documentation and information required to establish depository eligibility is not available at the time the initial application is submitted to the depository, the underwriter shall forward such documentation as soon as it is available; provided, however, this subparagraph (ii)(A) of this rule shall not apply to:

(1) an issue of municipal securities that fails to meet the criteria for depository eligibility at all depositories that accept municipal securities for deposit; or

(2) any new issue maturing in 60 days or less.;

(3) any new issue that is less than $1 million in par value; provided, however, that this exemption shall expire July 1, 1996.

        (iii) No change.

(b)-(c) No change.

 

Rule G-36 – Delivery of Official Statements, Advance Refunding Documents and Forms G-36(OS) and G-36(ARD) to Board or its Designee

(a) No change.

(b) Delivery Requirements for Issues Subject to Securities Exchange Act Rule 15c2-12.

        (i) Each broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer that acts as an underwriter in a primary offering of municipal securities subject to Securities Exchange Act rule 15c2-12 shall send to the Board or its designee by certified or registered mail, or some other equally prompt means that provides a record of sending, within one business day after receipt of the official statement from the issuer or its designated agent, but no later than 10 business days after any final agreement to purchase, offer, or sell the municipal securities, the following documents and written information: two copies of the final official statement; and two copies of completed Form G-36 G-36(OS) prescribed by the Board, including the CUSIP number or numbers for the issue.

        (ii) No change.

(c)-(f) No change.

 

(g)(i) Delivery of Official Statements and Form G-36(OS) for Issues Prior to the Effective Date of Rule G-36. By August 29, 1990, each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer that acts as an underwriter in a primary offering of municipal securities shall send to the Board or its designee by certified or registered mail, or some other equally prompt means that provides for a record of sending, the following documents and written information: official statements and Form G-36(OS) referred to in sections (b), (c) or (d), above, for each primary offering of municipal securities sold on or after January 1, 1990 to July 1, 1990.

        (ii) Delivery of Advance Refunding Documents for Issues Prior to the Effective Date of Rule G-36(b)(ii) and (c)(ii). By September 13, 1991, each broker, dealer and municipal securities dealer that acts as an underwriter in a primary offering of municipal securities shall send to the Board or its designee by certified or registered mail, or some other equally prompt means that provides for a record of sending, the following documents and written information: advance refunding documents and Form G-36(ARD) referred to in sections (b) and (c), above, for each primary offering of municipal securities sold on or after January 1, 1990, to July 13, 1991.

 

Rule G-37 – Political Contributions and Prohibitions on Municipal Securities Business

(a)-(f) No change.

(g) Definitions.

        (i)-(vi) No change.

        (vii) The term "municipal securities business" means:

(A) the purchase of a primary offering (as defined in rule A-13(d) A-13(f)) of municipal securities from the issuer on other than a competitive bid basis (i.e., e.g., negotiated underwriting); or

(B) the offer or sale of a primary offering of municipal securities on behalf of any issuer (i.e., e.g., private placement); or

(C)-(D) No change.

        (viii) No change.

(h) No change.

(i) A registered securities association with respect to a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who is a member of such association, or the appropriate regulatory agency as defined in Section 3(a)(34) of the Act with respect to any other broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, upon application, may exempt, conditionally or unconditionally, a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer who is prohibited from engaging in municipal securities business with an issuer pursuant to paragraph section (b) of this rule from such prohibition. In determining whether to grant such exemption, the registered securities association or appropriate regulatory agency shall consider, among other factors, whether:

        (i)-(ii) No change.

 

Rule G-39 – Telemarketing

(a) No broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer or person associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer shall:

 

        (a) (i) make outbound telephone calls to the residence of any person for the purpose of soliciting the purchase of municipal securities or related services at any time other than between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time at the called person’s location, without the prior consent of the person; or

        (b) (ii) make an outbound telephone call to any person for the purpose of soliciting the purchase of municipal securities or related services without disclosing promptly and in a clear and conspicuous manner to the called person the following information:

(i) (A) the identity of the caller and the firm;

(ii) (B) the telephone number or address at which the caller may be contacted; and

(iii) (C) that the purpose of the call is to solicit the purchase of municipal securities or related services.

 

(c) (b) The prohibitions of paragraphs section (a) and (b) shall not apply to telephone calls by any person associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, or another associated person acting at the direction of such person for the purpose of maintaining and servicing the accounts of existing customers of the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer under the control of or assigned to such associated person:

        (i)-(iii) No change.

For the purpose of paragraph (c) section (b), the term "existing customer" means a customer for whom the broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, or a clearing broker or dealer on behalf of such broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer, carries an account. The scope of this rule is limited to the telemarketing calls described herein; the terms of this rule shall not otherwise expressly or by implication impose on brokers, dealers or municipal securities dealers any additional requirements with respect to the relationship between a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and a customer or between a person associated with a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer and a customer.

---

ENDNOTES

1.  File No. SR-MSRB-99-4. Comments submitted to the SEC should refer to this file number.

2.  Underlining indicates additions; strikethrough indicates deletions.

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.

   

Customer Transaction Reporting Reminder on Transactions with Issuers and New Error Codes

Questions about this notice should be directed to John Baughman, Senior Data Analyst and Supervisor, at (202) 223-9347.

Reminder – New Issue Transactions with Issuers

MSRB rule G-14 requires that all transactions effected with customers must be reported to the MSRB by midnight on the day of the trade. The Board reminds submitters of transaction information to the Transaction Reporting System that MSRB rule D-9 defines "customer" as "...any person other than a broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer acting in its capacity as such or an issuer in transactions involving the sale by the issuer of a new issue of its securities."¹ The Board has discovered that, in at least one instance, sales by an issuer of a new issue to the underwriter may have been reported as a customer trade. A sale by the issuer to the underwriter of a new issue underwriting should not be reported to the MSRB Transaction Reporting System. Of course, sales of the new issue by the underwriter to customers or to other dealers must be reported either as customer trades or inter-dealer trades, as appropriate.

Additional Error Codes

The Transaction Reporting System has added two additional error codes. Beginning Monday, April 26, 1999, two new error messages will become part of the Transaction Reporting System data edit routine. These error messages are:

Error 402 RCD IGNORED: Cannot amend CUSIP number

Error 403 RCD IGNORED: Cannot amend trade date

If an attempt is made to amend either the trade date or CUSIP number, the submitter will receive one of these error messages and the existing trade record that previously was submitted to the Transaction Reporting System will remain unchanged.

The Transaction Reporting System allows for some data elements to be amended. This might be necessary, for example, when the settlement date for a new issue changes, causing new prices to be computed. However, some data elements are so integral to a trade that they cannot be amended in the Transaction Reporting System. The Board previously noted in the User's Manual for Customer Transaction Reporting to the MSRB ² that the CUSIP number could not be amended for transactions submitted to the Transaction Reporting System. Similarly, the Board did not anticipate that there would be any general need to revise the trade date after the initial submission of a trade. Dealers wishing to amend a transaction CUSIP number or trade date should cancel the transaction record and send a new record with the correct information.

April 15, 1999

---

ENDNOTES

1. MSRB Manual (CCH), � 3241 (emphasis added).

2. The User’s Manual for Customer Transaction Reporting to the MSRB is posted on the Board’s web site at www.msrb.org.

 

Copyright 2000 Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions of Use.