Select regulatory documents by category:
1. Bartholomew, Patricia E., 2014 Chair, Securities Industry Council on Continuing Education, and Bartol, William E., 2013 Chair, Securities Industry Council on Continuing Education: Letter dated January 13, 2014
2. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated January 13, 2014
3. Diamant Investment Corporation: E-mail from Herbert Diamant dated December 13, 2013
4. Financial Services Institute: Letter from David T. Bellaire, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, dated January 13, 2014
5. Investment Company Institute: Letter from Tamara K. Salmon, Senior Associate Counsel, dated January 13, 2014
6. MetLife Securities, Inc.: Letter from Jennifer Lewis, Corporate Counsel, dated January 13, 2014
7. National Society of Compliance Professionals: Letter from Judy Werner, Executive Director, dated January 14, 2014
8. Romano Wealth Management: E-mail from Joe Romano dated January 13, 2014
9. RW Smith & Associates, Inc.: E-mail from Paige Pierce dated January 13, 2014
10. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated January 13, 2014
11. Wulff, Hansen & Co.: Letter from Chris Charles, President, dated January 9, 2014
MSRB to Implement Protections for Investors Against Unexpected Changes in Bond Authorizing Documents
Bank Dealers, Dealers
Bank Dealers, Dealers
Bank Dealers, Dealers, Municipal Advisors
1. Financial Services Institute: Letter from David T. Bellaire, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, dated September 20, 2013
2. National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Jeanine Rodgers Caruso, President, dated September 20, 2013
3. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated September 20, 2013
4. U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.: E-mail from Herbert Neufeld dated August 19, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers
Bank Dealers, Dealers, Municipal Advisors
1. Financial Services Institute: Letter from David T. Bellaire, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, dated September 20, 2013
2. Investment Company Institute: Letter from Tamara K. Salmon, Senior Associate Counsel, dated September 20, 2013
3. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director, Associate General Counsel, dated September 20, 2013
4. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC: Letter from Robert J. McCarthy, Director of Regulatory Policy, dated September 20, 2013
5. Wells Fargo Securities: Letter from Gerald K. Mayfield, Senior Counsel, dated September 20, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers
1. Ambassador Financial Group: E-mail from Allen Collins dated August 8, 2013
2. Barclays Capital Inc.: Letter from Jennifer Small, Municipal Compliance, dated October 7, 2013
3. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated October 7, 2013
4. Financial Services Institute: Letter from David T. Bellaire, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, dated October 7, 2013
5. Interactive Data Corporation: Letter from Mark Hepsworth, President, Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, dated October 7, 2013
6. Investment Company Institute: Letter from Tamara K. Salmon, Senior Associate Counsel, dated September 20, 2013
7. J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons LLC: Letter from Alex Rorke, Director, Public Finance
8. Melton, Chris: Letter dated September 26, 2013
9. Private Investor: E-mail from Private Investor dated September 2, 2013
10. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated October 7, 2013
11. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC: Letter from Robert J. McCarthy, Director of Regulatory Policy, dated October 7, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers, Municipal Advisors
1. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated November 1, 2013
2. Corporate Treasury Investment Consulting LLC: Letter from Mark O. Conner, Principal, dated August 16, 2013
3. Financial Information Forum: Letter from Manisha Kimmel, Executive Director, dated November 1, 2013
4. Interactive Data Corporation: Letter from Mark Hepsworth, President, Interactive Data Pricing and Reference Data, dated November 1, 2013
5. Leonard, Jack: Letter dated August 1, 2013
6. Long, Cate: E-mail dated November 1, 2013
7. Sayer, Steven: E-mail dated November 3, 2013
8. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated November 1, 2013
9. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC: Letter from Robert J.McCarthy, Director of Regulatory Policy, dated November 1, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers
Bank Dealers, Dealers, Municipal Advisors
Bank Dealers, Dealers
Bank Dealers, Dealers
1. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated June 12, 2013
2. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director, Associate General Counsel, dated June 12, 2013
3. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC: Letter from Robert J. McCarthy, Director of Regulatory Policy, dated June 12, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers
Bank Dealers, Dealers
1. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated May 6, 2013
2. College Savings Foundation: Letter from Roger Michaud, Chairman, dated May 6, 2013
3. College Savings Plans Network: Letter from Michael L. Fitzgerald, Treasurer of Iowa and Chairman, dated May 6, 2013
4. Financial Services Institute: Letter from David T. Bellaire, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, dated May 6, 2013
5. Investment Company Institute: Letter from Tamara K. Salmon, Senior Associate Counsel, dated May 5, 2013
6. Retail Investor: Email from Retail Investor dated August 25, 2013
7. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director, Associate General Counsel, dated May 6, 2013
8. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC: Letter from Robert J. McCarthy, Director of Regulatory Policy, dated May 6, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers, Municipal Advisors
1. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated March 28, 2013
2. Boyle, Nick: Letter
3. City of Milwaukee: E-mail from Richard Li dated March 7, 2013
4. Government Finance Officers Association: Letter from Dustin McDonald, Director, Federal Liaison Center, dated April 30, 2013
5. National Association of Bond Lawyers: Letter from Scott R. Lilienthal, President, dated March 29, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers
1. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated March 12, 2013
2. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.: Letter from Michael P. Moran, Vice President, Compliance, dated March 12, 2013
3. Lumesis, Inc.: Letter from Gregg L. Bienstock, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, dated March 11, 2013
4. Lumesis, Inc.: Letter from Gregg L. Bienstock, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, dated July 17, 2013
5. R.W. Smith & Associates, Inc.: E-mail from Paige Pierce dated March 20, 2013
6. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated March 12, 2013
7. TMC Bonds, L.L.C.: Letter from Thomas S. Vales, Chief Executive Officer, dated March 11, 2013
8. Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC: Letter from Robert J. McCarthy, Director of Regulatory Policy, dated March 12, 2013
Bank Dealers, Dealers
Bank Dealers, Dealers
1. Barclays Capital Inc.: Letter from Scott Coya, Director, Municipal Compliance, dated March 15, 2013
2. Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated March 15, 2013
3. Charles Schwab & Co. Inc.: Letter from Michael P. Moran, Vice President, Fixed Income Compliance, dated March 15, 2013
4. Eastern Bank: E-mail from James N. Fox, SVP and Managing Director, dated March 15, 2013
5. Financial Information Forum: Letter from Arsalan Shahid, Program Director, dated March 15, 2013
6. Financial Services Institute: Letter from David T. Bellaire, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, dated March 15, 2013
7. Frost Bank: Letter from Robert N. Jacobs, Assistant Vice President/Compliance Officer, dated March 11, 2013
8. Investment Company Institute: Letter from Dorothy Donohue, Deputy General Counsel-Securities Regulation, dated March 15, 2013
9. J.W. Korth & Company LP: E-mail from James Korth dated March 14, 2013
10. R.W. Smith & Associates, Inc.: E-mail from Paige Pierce, dated March 20, 2013
11. Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from Leslie M. Norwood, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated March 15, 2013
12. Seidel & Shaw, LLC: Letter from Thomas W. Shaw, President, dated March 15, 2013
13. Standish: E-mail from Daniel Rabasco dated March 15, 2013
14. TMC Bonds, L.L.C.: Letter from Thomas S. Vales, Chief Executive Officer, dated March 15, 2013
15. Tradition Asiel Securities, Inc.: Letter from Eric M. Earnhardt, Chief Compliance Officer, dated March 19, 2013
CUSIP Numbers for Callable Multi-Series GOs: Rule G-34
Rule G-34 requires underwriters and dealers participating in the placement of a new issue of municipal securities to ensure that an application is made for CUSIP numbers for the new issue.[1] The CUSIP Service Bureau assigns CUSIP numbers to reflect the differences in securities that are relevant to trading and investment decisions.[2] In addition, Board rules G-12 and G-15 require that CUSIP numbers appear on confirmations of transactions and that the securities delivered on those transactions match the CUSIP numbers appearing on the confirmations.[3]
Recently, certain questions have arisen about the proper method for assignment of CUSIP numbers to certain general obligation securities that have been issued in multiple series. In these issues, the issuer uses the proceeds from each series to fund a separate project, but the project itself offers bondholders no additional security for payment beyond that provided by the full faith and credit of the issuer. Securities within multiple series may be identical with respect to dated date, maturity, security and source of payment. However, an individual series may be called, in whole or part, at the option of the issuer, based on the series designation. In addition, the securities are subject to certain mandatory redemption features, which are exercisable by series and which are dependent upon the status of the project funded by the series.
Underwriters have encountered confusion as to whether each series within these issues should be assigned separate CUSIP numbers or whether the CUSIP number assignment for the issues should ignore the series designation. The Board wishes to clarify that, because of the possibility that the securities will be subject to early redemption by series designation, separate CUSIP numbers for each series are required.
The Board previously has indicated that a designation of multiple "purposes" for general obligation debt does not require separate CUSIP numbers for each purpose if the securities otherwise are identical.[4] Accordingly, there are a number of outstanding multi-series general obligation issues which are assigned one CUSIP number for each maturity and which are traded, cleared, and settled without regard to series designation. While the Board does not wish to change this general rule, it believes that separate CUSIP number assignment is required for those multi-series issues which can be called by series. The Board notes that the probability of a partial or "in-whole" redemption of a series has the potential to become a significant factor to investors and that it therefore is necessary to preserve distinctions among the various series when trading, clearing and settling these securities.
The Board has consulted with the CUSIP Service Bureau in this matter and the Service Bureau has agreed to assign separate CUSIP numbers to multi-series general obligation issues which can be called by series. Dealers serving as underwriters for these issues therefore should not request the Service Bureau to ignore the series designation when assigning numbers to these issues.
[1]The rule applies to all issues eligible for CUSIP number assignment. This includes nearly all new issue securities over three months in maturity.
[2] CUSIP numbers are assigned to municipal issues by their issuer title, dated date, interest rate, and maturity date. Municipal securities which are identical as to these four elements are assigned different numbers if there is a further distinction between the securities involving any of the following:
(1) the call features (i.e., whether or not securities are callable, date or terms of call feature, etc.);
(2) any limitation of the pledge on a general obligation bond (e.g., limited tax versus full faith and credit);
(3) any distinction in the secondary security or the source of payment of a revenue bond;
(4) the identity of any entity, besides the issuer, obligated on the debt service of the securities (e.g., two pollution control revenue bonds secured by different corporate obligors); and
(5) any distinction in the secondary security or the source of payment of a general obligation bond.
[3] Certain exceptions to these rules exist for securities which have not been assigned CUSIP numbers and instances in which the CUSIP number on a confirmation and the CUSIP number assigned to securities differ only because of a transposition or transcription error.
[4] See MSRB Reports Vol. 2, No. 1, (January 1982), p. 3. Of course, if specific portions of a general obligation issue are additionally backed by the revenues from various issuer activity or proceeds from various projects (so-called "double-barrelled" issues), separate CUSIP numbers are required to reflect these distinctions.
