Select regulatory documents by category:
Back to top
Notice 2012-14 - Request for Comment
Publication date: | Comment due:
Rule Number:

Rule G-34


1.  Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated April 10, 2012

2.  Full Life Financial LLC: Letter from Keith Newcomb, Portfolio Manager, dated April 14, 2012

3.  Government Finance Officers Association: Letter from Susan Gaffney, Director, Federal Liaison Center, dated April 6, 2012

4.  Kious and Co.: E-mail from Michael Kious dated March 13, 2012

5.  M. E. Allison & Co., Inc.: Letter from Christopher R. Allison, Chief Financial Officer, dated March 13, 2012

6.  McGuirk, Hugh: E-mail dated March 14, 2012

7.  National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Colette J. Irwin-Knott, President, dated April 9, 2012

8.  Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.: Letter from Allison F. Fleitas II, Managing Director, Municipal Capital Markets Group

9.  UMB Bank, N.A.: E-mail from Kristin Koziol dated March 30, 2012

Notice 2012-13 - Request for Comment
Publication date: | Comment due:

1.  Alamo Capital: E-mail from Bill Mullally dated March 9, 2012

2.  Bond Dealers of America: Letter from Michael Nicholas, Chief Executive Officer, dated April 13, 2012

3.  CFA Institute: Letter from Kurt N. Schacht, Managing Director, Standards and Financial Market Integrity, and James C. Allen, Head, Capital Markets Policy, dated April 13, 2012

4.  Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.: Letter from David E. Fischer-Lodike, Capital Markets and Operations Compliance, dated April 13, 2012

5.  Full Life Financial LLC: Letter from Keith Newcomb, Portfolio Manager, dated April 13, 2012

6.  Government Finance Officers Association: Letter from Susan Gaffney, Director, Federal Liaison Center, dated April 13, 2012

7.  Investment Company Institute: Letter from Dorothy Donohue, Deputy General Counsel-Securities Regulation, dated April 13, 2012

8.  Li, Richard: Letter dated March 7, 2012

9.  Melton, Chris: E-mail dated April 13, 2012

10.  National Association of Independent Public Finance Advisors: Letter from Colette J. Irwin-Knott, President, dated April 13, 2012

11.  Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director, Associate General Counsel, dated April 13, 2012

12.  Thornburg Investment Management: Letter from Josh Gonze, Chris Ryon, and Chris Ihlefeld, Co-Portfolio Managers, dated March 12, 2012

13.  Vanguard: Letter from Christopher Alwine, Head of Municipal Bond Group, dated April 13, 2012

14.  Wells Fargo Advisors: Letter from Ronald C. Long, Director of Regulatory Affairs, dated April 13, 2012

Notice 2012-12 - Informational Notice
Publication date:
Notice 2012-10 - Request for Comment
Publication date: | Comment due:


1.  Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.: Letter from Charles V. Callan, Chief Regulatory Officer, dated April 2, 2012

2.  College Savings Foundation: Letter from Roger Michaud, Chairman, dated April 2, 2012

3.  College Savings Plans Network: Letter from Michael L. Fitzgerald, Chair, College Savings Plans Network, & State Treasurer of Iowa, dated April 2, 2012

4.  Commonwealth Financial Network: Letter from Brendan Daly, Legal and Compliance Counsel, dated March 30, 2012

5.  Consumer Federation of America: Letter from Barbara Roper, Director of Investor Protection, dated May 7, 2012

6.  Investment Company Institute: Letter from Tamara K. Salmon, Senior Associate Counsel, dated April 2, 2012

7.  Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association: Letter from David L. Cohen, Managing Director and Associate General Counsel, dated April 2, 2012

8.  Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP: Letter from Michael Koffler dated April 2, 2012

9.  T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.: Letter from David Oestreicher, Chief Legal Counsel, and Regina M. Watson, Senior Associate Counsel, dated April 2, 2012

10.  Utah Educational Savings Plan: Letter from Lynne N. Ward, Executive Director, dated April 2, 2012

11.  Virginia College Savings Plan: Letter from Mary G. Morris, Chief Executive Officer, dated April 2, 2012

Notice 2012-08 - Informational Notice
Publication date:
Notice 2012-06 - Informational Notice
Publication date:
Notice 2012-05 - Informational Notice
Publication date:
Notice 2012-04 - Request for Comment
Publication date: | Comment due:
Rule Number:

Rule G-17

1.  BondView: Letter from Robert Kane, CEO, dated March 5, 2012

2.  Government Finance Officers Association: Letter from Susan Gaffney, Director, Federal Liaison Center, dated March 9, 2012

3.  Haynsworth Sinkler Boyd, P.A.: Letter from Kathleen Crum McKinney and Theodore B. DuBose, dated March 5, 2012

4.  Ice Miller LLP: Letter from Philip C. Genetos dated March 6, 2012

5.  Indiana Housing & Community Development Authority: Letter from Blake A. Blanch, Chief Financial Officer

6.  Indianapolis Airport Authority: Letter from Joseph R. Heerens, Chief Legal Officer, dated March 6, 2012

7.  Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority: Letter from Michael J. Smith, Assistant Treasurer

8.  National Association of Bond Lawyers: Letter from Kristin H.R. Franceschi, President, dated March 8, 2012

9.  National Federation of Municipal Analysts: Letter from Lisa Good, Executive Director, dated March 26, 2012

10.  Squire Sanders LLP: Letter dated March 6, 2012

Notice 2012-02 - Informational Notice
Publication date:
Notice 2012-01 - Informational Notice
Publication date:
Interpretive Guidance - Interpretive Notices
Publication date:
Transactions in Municipal Collateralized Mortgage Obligations: Rule G-15
Rule Number:

Rule G-15

The Board has become aware that some municipal issuers recently have issued securities that are structured as collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). Like the CMOs issued by non-municipal issuers, these securities represent interest in pools of mortgages and are partitioned into several classes (or tranches), which are serialized as to priority for redemption and payment of principal.

Since these "municipal CMOs" are being issued directly by political subdivisions, agencies or instrumentalities of state or local governments, it appears that they may be "municipal securities," as that term is defined under section 3(a)(29) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.[1] Although the interest paid on these instruments may be subject to federal taxation, the Board reminds dealers that transactions in municipal securities are subject to Board rules whether those securities are taxable or tax-exempt. Accordingly, dealers executing transactions in municipal CMOs should ensure that they are in compliance with all applicable Board rules. For example, dealers should ensure that all Board requirements regarding professional qualifications and recordkeeping are observed.[2]

Because the interest and principal payment features of municipal CMOs are very different from those of traditional municipal bonds, dealers should take care to ensure that all Board rules designed for the protection of customers are observed. This includes ensuring that: (i) all material facts about each transaction are disclosed to the customer, in compliance with rule G-17; (ii) each transaction recommended to a customer is suitable for the customer, in compliance with rule G-19; and (iii) the price of each customer transaction is fair and reasonable, in compliance with rule G-30. With respect to the material facts that should be disclosed to customers, dealers should ensure that customers are adequately informed of the likelihood of "prepayment" of principal on the securities and the likelihood of the securities being redeemed substantially prior to the stated maturity date. If the amount of principal that will be delivered to the customer differs from the "face" amount to be delivered, the customer also should be informed of this fact, along with the amount of the principal that will be delivered.

The Board also has reviewed the requirements of rule G-15(a)(i)(l)[*] with respect to confirmation disclosure of "yield to maturity" or "yield to call" on customer confirmations in these securities. Because CMOs typically pay principal to holders prior to maturity and because the actual duration of the securities often varies significantly from the stated maturity, the Board has interpreted rule G-15(a) not to require a statement of yield for transactions in municipal CMOs. A dealer that decides to voluntarily include a statement of "yield" on a confirmation for these securities must also disclose on the confirmation the method by which yield was computed. This will help to avoid the possibility of the customer misunderstanding the yield figure if he should use it to compare the merits of alternative investments.

The Board will be monitoring municipal CMOs and will adopt specific rules for the instruments in the future if this appears to be necessary.


[1] Of course, whether any instrument is a municipal security is a matter to be determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

[2] In addition, as noted above, the interest paid on these instruments may be subject to federal taxation. If the securities are identified by the issuer or sold by the underwriter as subject to federal taxation, rules G-12(c) and G-15(a) require confirmations to contain a designation to that effect.

[*] [Currently codified at rule G-15(a)(i)(A)(5)]